Analysis of Lincolns 2nd Inaugural
Lincolns 2nd Inaugural came at a time when the nation needed to heal after the deep and violent division of the Civil War. Lincoln understood that there were going to be lingering hard feelings once the war was finally over, and he sensed that a new spirit needed to be breathed into the nation. This document analysis looks at Lincoln as the author of the speech, his purpose, audience, its credibility, and its message and significance to show why the 2nd Inaugural remains so meaningful and powerful even today.
1 Author and Purpose
The author of the speech is Abraham Lincoln, the 16th President of the United States. Lincolns background can help to explain some of the power of this speech: he himself was not born into riches and wealth but rather into a social class of humble origins. Yet, he rose to prominence and power through education, hard work, tenacity, and dedication to a legal and political pursuit. His work in the law and in politics connected him to ordinary, everyday people whom he implicitly understood since he was from among them.
His purpose in writing this address was to address the awful situation into which the nation had fallen during the war between the North and the South. He wanted to take this opportunity to reflect on the causes and meaning of the Civil War, which was nearing its end, and to set...
He wanted to draw out the moral and divine dimensions of the war, particularly regarding slavery, and to prepare the nation for the challenges of post-war reconstruction. He wanted, most of all, for everyone on both sides of the conflict to help in burying the hatchet: It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces but let us judge not that we be not judged, Lincoln stated in the 2nd Inaugural. He wanted to unify both sides in a spirit of charity.Date, Location, and Audience
The document was...
…but healing and mercy. At the same time, it is important for its recognition of slavery as the war's central issue and its call for national reconciliation. Lincoln asks whether God may be using the war to punish the US for its sin of slavery for so many years. It is a moral question that resounds with the conclusion of the speech, to forgive and work to support one another in charity. The strengths of the speech are in its eloquence, its full moral clarity, its vision for a unified future, and its assessment of the cause of the war. However, a potential weakness could be seen in its reliance on a single cause, slaverywhich is bound to make some in the South upset, since in their view the war was not caused by slavery but by the desire for states rights. In effect, it was a continuation of the federalist vs. anti-federalist debatesjust this time on the battlefield. But perhaps Lincoln did well to avoid this topic, since it could be like dredging up old…
References
Lincoln, A. (1865). 2nd Inaugural Speech.
Civil War How did it happen that the North won the Civil War, notwithstanding the fact that the South had its own powerful advantages? This paper explores that question using chapters 11, 12, 13 and 14 for reference sources. Background on the Southern economy and politics The South greatly expanded its agricultural industry (the plantation system) between 1800 and 1860, and in doing so became "increasingly unlike the North," the author explains in
Civil War of Northern Aggression Is the Term Accurate? The Civil war has been one of the most controversial topics in the history of United States. Where it has been given many names like War Between the States, the War of the Rebellion and the War for Southern Independence, one of its most controversial names is the War of Northern Aggression. There is an enormous amount of literature written on the subject
Civil War represents a decisive period in American history, but also one of violence, during which more than 620,000 Americans died. (Gary B. Nash, Carter Smith, page 144) The American Civil War was fought between North and the South, and started as a result of their differences regarding slavery, state's rights and federal authority. The decisive moment was when Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln won the election, and become the president
Scene Four: Parker Adderson, Philospher This scene will take place exactly as it does in the story. The stage will be divided into two parts. In center stage will be the tent with the Parker Adderson and the general. Adderson will be sitting across from the general at the table and will be questioned. The monologue will unfold with only this part of the stage being lit. After the fight, Adderson will
Civil War Would the union still have won the civil war if the Border States separated? The union would have still won if the Border States separated. During the Civil War the Border States, Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri, were not critical to the unions victory over the confederates. Unfortunately, our modern society has been marred with war and strife over its eventful lifespan. A civil disagreement, when accompanied by mass offenses, often
Civil Death Death and the American Civil War: Disruptions of Decency and a New Awareness of Reality Victorian notions of the body and its functions were complex given the combination of the rise in biological and medical knowledge that occurred during the nineteenth century and the prudery that gained such traction during the same era. These two trajectories were likely not in simple conflict as they might appear, but rather the increasing
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now