United States Supreme Court Decision Term Paper

Length: 6 pages Sources: 3 Subject: Business - Law Type: Term Paper Paper: #23442236 Related Topics: United States Constitution, Supreme Court, United States History, History Of The United States
Excerpt from Term Paper :



However, this Court also recognizes that mental illness oftentimes differs from other immutable characteristics, such as mental retardation and age, in that a defendant oftentimes has the ability to control mental illness through medical interventions. While there is tremendous evidence of Panetti's deteriorated mental state, there is very little evidence to support Panetti's assertions that he was insane at the time of the murders. Though there are serious questions regarding Panetti's competency to stand trial, much less his competency to represent himself in that trial, there simply does not appear to be any evidence that he was insane at the time of the murders. Panetti engaged in preparations that were rationally aimed at accomplishing the murder of his in-laws, but was able to refrain from killing his wife and child. In addition, he engaged in a stand-off with police that resulted in him escaping the stand-off without being killed and without the deaths of additional people. This behavior certainly demonstrates a greater level of competency than Panetti's post-conviction behavior and suggests that Panetti was not insane at the time of the commission of the crimes. The problem is that, because Panetti is not currently competent and may not have been competent at the time of the trial, it is impossible to determine whether or not Panetti should have been found not guilty by reason of insanity or incompetent to stand trial. It is simply impossible to know who is correct: the experts who believe that Panetti is malingering or the ones who believe he is suffering from a severe psychiatric disorder which prevents him from understanding the reason behind his execution.

Fortunately, the Court is...

...

The experts agree that Panetti exhibits rational thought when being treated by anti-psychotic medication. Therefore, the Court orders a stay of Panetti's execution and remands this case to the trial court, with instructions for that court to direct Panetti to an appropriate criminal mental-health facility for treatment, including but not limited to, involuntary medication. If and when treating psychiatrists are able to make a determination that Panetti is competent, then Panetti is to be returned to death row, ordered to continue all psychiatric treatment, included force medications, and given the opportunity for a final appeal of his death sentence, in which he must raise any and all possible appellate issues.

The problem is that this Court, like the courts below, is not in the position to determine whether or not Panetti is competent. Several experts and his mental health history suggest that he is unable to rationally understand why he is being executed, and a rational understanding of that reason, though not required under Ford, is necessary to satisfy the Eighth Amendment and its attendant prohibitions against the execution of the insane. Because the Court lacks the means to determine whether Panetti has this understanding, the Court cannot make a final determination regarding Panetti's death sentence. However, the American ideal of justice, which has not always been followed by preceding courts, requires that the Court err on the side of the defendant's rights and issue a stay of execution until Panetti can be declared competent enough to have a rational understanding of why he is being executed.

Petitioner's brief, 1.

Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, 322 (1976).

Woodson…

Sources Used in Documents:

Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, 322 (1976).

Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, 299 (1976).

Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409-10 (1986).


Cite this Document:

"United States Supreme Court Decision" (2007, May 06) Retrieved April 11, 2021, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/united-states-supreme-court-decision-37913

"United States Supreme Court Decision" 06 May 2007. Web.11 April. 2021. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/united-states-supreme-court-decision-37913>

"United States Supreme Court Decision", 06 May 2007, Accessed.11 April. 2021,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/united-states-supreme-court-decision-37913

Related Documents
US Supreme Court Cases Howes,
Words: 596 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Business - Law Paper #: 19248486

Is the EEOC's understanding of its rule entitled to respect under Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke, 127 S. Ct. 2339 (2007) -- a case decided twelve days after the Eighth Circuit delivered its decision in this case? Martel v. Clair - Docket No., 10-1265 In this case after ten years of capital federal habeas corpus proceedings in the district court, respondent abruptly complained about and sought substitution of his

US Supreme Court
Words: 358 Length: 1 Pages Topic: Business - Law Paper #: 78344139

Supreme Court In the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, the United States Supreme Court overturned the "separate but equal" standard adopted by the 1892 Plessy v. Ferguson. Until Brown v. Board of Education passed, American public schools were segregated. Brown v. Board of Education transformed American society by outlawing racial segregation. Now that American schools are integrated, the Brown v. Board of Education decision seems immutable. However,

Criminal Justice Supreme Court Decisions
Words: 685 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Business - Law Paper #: 15715238

The plaintiffs were disabled Tennesseans who could not access the upper floors in state courthouses. They sued in Federal Court, arguing that since Tennessee was disallowing them public services for the reason that their disabilities, it was infringing Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Tennessee argued that the Eleventh Amendment banned the suit, and filed a motion to dismiss the case. It relied chiefly on Board

Supreme Courts Decisions Regargding the
Words: 653 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Healthcare Paper #: 3617035

Components of this act that have been targeted towards advanced nursing practitioners include a lifting of the limits for how much money can be spent on doctoral programs for nurses (No author, 2011). Most advanced practice nurses have a master's degree; the removal of the cap for funding for doctoral programs will almost certainly allow these professionals to complete more doctoral degrees, increase their breadth of knowledge, and provide

US Supreme Court and the Rights of Inmates
Words: 534 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Criminal Justice Paper #: 73047895

U.S. Supreme Court and the Rights of Inmates The objective of this study is to identify the constitutional amendments that deal directly with the rights of correctional inmates. For each amendment, this work will describe the rights of inmates and correctional procedures that evolved to protect those rights. Lastly, this work will explain the role of the U.S. Supreme Court in interpreting correctional law, inmates' rights and correctional procedures. Four Amendments That

Supreme Court Decisions the Nature
Words: 2427 Length: 7 Pages Topic: Criminal Justice Paper #: 84941893

For example, he voted to require that schools utilize resources to support religions activities if they designate resources to non-religious activities (Board of Education. v. Mergens, 1990). Further, Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002) called for vouchers to be given to families of low socioeconomic standing for both religious and secular educational institutions. This being said, Rehnquist was not able to completely disrupt the social change that Warren had started in