William Apess' Bible-Based Arguments Against Racism Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
988
Cite
Related Topics:

Biblical Argument William Apess and the Biblical argument against racism

As a Native American who lived through the end of the 18th century and first 39 years of the 19th century, William Apess was subjected to extreme levels of racial prejudice. Indeed, the years during which Apess was most prolific as an author corresponded with the Presidential term of Andrew Jackson, a figure whose political platform included the mistreatment (and eradication) of Native Americans. As the son of a former slave and a member of the Pequot Native American tribe, Apess was exposed to significant racial injustice. However, he was also an Evangelical Christian, and used his extensive knowledge of the Bible as a platform through which to argue against racism. He also advocated for Native Americans to receive a formal education, and his own writing testifies to the power that education can have in influencing popular belief. Drawing from Apess's 1833 essay "An Indian's Looking-Glass for the White Man" and 1831 memoir "A Son of the Forest," this essay delineates Apess's Biblical arguments against racism.

In "A Son of the Forest," Apess provides a comprehensive description of the injustice that was inflicted upon him by the white race. Additionally, he describes the immoral conduct exhibited by members...

...

Writing about the violent, alcoholic behavior of his own grandmother (who broke his arm in a drunken rage when the author was four years old), Apess states that "this cruel and unnatural conduct was the effect of some cause. I attribute it in great measure to the whites" (7). It should be noted that Apess does not exonerate his grandmother from blame. However, by stating that the violence "was the effect of some cause," Apess's statement implies that people (including Native Americans) are inherently virtuous and therefore should not be targeted as objects of discrimination. By arguing that the Native Americans are not inherently immoral, Apess implicitly suggests that Native Americans descended from Adam and Eve, a claim that he earlier makes explicit through stating that "We are in fact but one family; we are all the descendents of one great progenitor -- Adam" (4).
In "An Indian's Looking Glass for the White Man," Apess invokes more explicit references to the Bible in arguing against the racism that was rampant against Native Americans. Apess's foremost argument against racism lies in the fact that God repeatedly emphasizes the importance of loving one's neighbors, and that racism fundamentally contradicts this Biblical dictum. Apess proves that Native Americans are justifiably the neighbors of white men because they, not the whites, are in fact the indigenous peoples of North America. This fact is significant in that it denotes how a neighbor should not be determined through the superficiality of race. Apess argues, after all, that it is illogical for the white race to not consider other races as neighbors since the vast majority…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Apess, William. "An Indians Looking-Glass for the White Man." Faculty. Texas A&M University-Commerce. 14 Nov. 2012.

Apess, William. "A Son of the Forest." On Our Own Ground: The Complete Writings of William Apess, a Pequot. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1992. 1-99.


Cite this Document:

"William Apess' Bible-Based Arguments Against Racism" (2012, November 16) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/william-apess-bible-based-arguments-against-76484

"William Apess' Bible-Based Arguments Against Racism" 16 November 2012. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/william-apess-bible-based-arguments-against-76484>

"William Apess' Bible-Based Arguments Against Racism", 16 November 2012, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/william-apess-bible-based-arguments-against-76484

Related Documents
Argumentative
PAGES 2 WORDS 619

Introduction The best argumentative essay titles reveal the nature of the argument and suggest the position that you will be taking as the author of the argument.  Since every argument has at least two sides to it, your essay title should point out these two sides.  Then it should identify the side you think makes the most sense, i.e., the correct position to take.  One of the easiest ways to do

Cohabitation Epidemic Argument Analysis" "The Cohabitation Epidemic" In "The Cohabitation Epidemic," Neil Clark Warren argues that cohabitation between unmarried couples is an unhealthy situation that is decreasing the livelihood and well being of people in the contemporary context. Warren's argument is based on the idea that [state here the most important premises or assumption of the argument, or the basic strategy of his argument]. More specifically, in a part of his argument

Privacy, Security, Whistleblowing [Surveillance is a necessary evil to prevent terrorist attacks from happening.]A [For example, the secret "PRISM" effort saved New York City's subways from a 2009 terrorist plot led by a young Afghan-American, Najibullah Zazi.] A = Main Argument Surveillance is a necessary evil to prevent terrorist attacks B = Level The secret PRISM effort saved New York City's subways in 2009 from a terrorist plot. Claim B. is Level 1 and supports Argument

Immigration between the Obama Administration and Congress: United States immigration policy has been an issue of major political debates and controversies for several decades. The controversy surrounding the nation's immigration policy is partly because policymakers are increasingly considering the need to maintain global competitiveness through attracting top overseas talent against the need to curtail illegal immigration and secure the country's borders (Lee par, 1). In the past few years, the

This choice gives them the ample time to balance their social life with the economic endeavors hence not remaining economically disadvantaged and dependent on men due to childbearing. The social independence and economic stability will also lead to better health for the mothers and the population at large. Hence, it is significant to note that the birth control aspect is a thing that starts from personal level but affects

Homosexuality and Marriage Argumentative Response Controversial debates have been on the rise on whether gay marriages should be allowed in the society. Marriage is a key institution in the society. There are many reasons for marriage that may not apply to homosexuals. Gay marriages should not be allowed because marriage is traditional and morally for heterosexuals. This will cause a lot of chaos in the society, which will destroy the institution of