College Athletes And Athletes Research Paper

PAGES
5
WORDS
1683
Cite
Related Topics:

¶ … College Athletes Be Paid? Athletics at college level comprise of an array of competitive sports and games that are largely non-professional. These sporting pursuits demand a lot of physical skill and involvement. There should also be requisite systems necessary to prepare the athletes for higher-level competition and excellent performance. In the U.S., for example, there are over 400,000 students who participate in college sports competitions every year. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) organizes the largest participation programs. Others that undertake such programs are the national Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA) and NJCAA, which is the common reference for National Junior College Athletics Association.

College basketball and American football draw the highest number of fans and viewership. College athletics in the U.S. is regarded as amateur sport and is limited to a specified number of available scholarships that are based on Title IX in the U.S. (NCAA). Taking part in college sports is fun and enjoyable for many students. It is also attractive because it offers chances for scholarships (NCAA). Yet, a close examination of the life of a college athlete reveals that they are not having as much fun as the world thinks. There are challenges and, indeed, hard truths that confront a student. It is debatable whether college athletes need to be paid.

Schrager points out that the cartel linked to college sports generates a whopping $1 billion each year as revenue. Most of the income comes from sale of television rights and March Madness. A case in point is the match between Kentucky vs. Wisconsin basketball match. It was viewed by the highest number of people locally and was even televised by international channels. At least 27 million people viewed the match on CBS alone. International broadcast through ESPN was done to over 170 countries. CBS and Turner Broadcasting paid NCCA a huge sum of $10.8 billion. That was back in 2010 and the payment was meant for 14 years of television rights to broadcast college athletics competitions. The payment was not excessive since CBS is reported to have sold over 1.13billion dollars worth of ads in the 2015 tournament. It is also reported that head coaches Bo Ryan of Wisconsin and Krzyzewski of Duke accrued combined earnings of $12,628,032 in the 2015 tournament alone. It is clear that all the revenue generated is shared among all other stakeholders except the athletes.

The idea of the need to pay...

...

The immense revenue generated from sale of television rights in the NCAA football competitions and basketball's Match Madness, cause an ever-increasing clamor to have college basketball and football participants paid much more than just scholarships. However, some still think that there is need to pay the players. This paper is an argumentation that seeks to explore the advantages and disadvantages of paying or not paying college athletes (Johnson & Acquaviva).
According to Peebles, college athletics is big business. He further points out that the only people who are not paid, or have limited gains are athletes who participate in the games. It is evident that only college athletes who are restricted financially in college life. Therefore, the claim that it is based on educational considerations is a big lie. Other students are never told what they can or cannot make.

It should not be overlooked that college athletes put their lives and health on the line in participating in the rigorous competitions. Indeed, many athletes sustain serious injuries while playing in the competitions. A few are only lucky to recover and compete again. There have been cases of athletes paralyzed because of tackles or hits they get in the field of play. Many have seen their careers come to an abrupt stop. Such sacrifice calls for compensation at the very least (Patterson).

Johnson and Acquaviva point out those using scholarships as an excuse to not pay athletes are being unfair and misplaced. The claim that scholarships provide free education is false. NCAA added more provisions to the initial scholarship that only included tuition. Now athletes with scholarships are provided with room, boarding, and books. The scholarships range in value from $30,000 to $200 000; although it is better to peg the figure at between $ 20,000 to $100,000 over a four-year span. It is important that the figures still do not equate to the full cost of attending college.

According to estimates done by Collegiate Athletes Coalition (CAC), the scholarships provided by NCAA fall short of the required cost of attending a university by about $ 200,000. This computation is modest because it does not even factor expenses such as travel and sundries in the estimates. Thus, the scholarships are more…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Johnson, Dennis and Acquaviva, John. "Point/Counterpoint: Paying College Athletes." The Sport Journal, 15 June 2012, http://thesportjournal.org/article/pointcounterpoint-paying-college-athletes. Accessed 25 November 2016.

NCAA. "NCAA." 2016. http://www.ncaa.org. Accessed 25 November 2016.

Patterson, Tiffany. "Should College Athletes Be Paid?" Smart Asset, 26 September 2016, https://smartasset.com/insights/should-student-athletes-be-paid. Accessed 25 November 2016.

Peebles, Maurice. "7 Common Sense Reasons Why College Athletes Should Be Paid (According to Jay Bilas)." Complex Sports, 3 December 2015, http://www.complex.com/sports/2015/12/jay-bilas-interview. Accessed 3 November 2016.
Sanderson, Allen and Siegfried, John. "Commentary: Enough madness: Just pay college athletes." Chicago Tribune, 2 February 2016, http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-ncaa-athletes-pay-sports-college-perspec-0203-20160202-story.html. Accessed 25 November 2016.
Schrager, Allison. "Paying college athletes won't solve the big problem with U.S. college sports." QUARTZ, 21 March 2016, http://qz.com/625014/paying-college-athletes-wont-solve-the-big-problem-with-us-college-sports. Accessed 25 November 2016.


Cite this Document:

"College Athletes And Athletes" (2016, November 30) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/college-athletes-and-athletes-2162906

"College Athletes And Athletes" 30 November 2016. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/college-athletes-and-athletes-2162906>

"College Athletes And Athletes", 30 November 2016, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/college-athletes-and-athletes-2162906

Related Documents

College athletes' payment issue drags the development of the game within the association (NCAA). The debate of whether college athletes should obtain payment for their services needs to rest by extensive solution. The perfect way to solve the issue at hand involves additional payment for the services of the college athletes. This would supplement the scholarships and accommodation fees university and college athletes enjoy currently. There are several reasons why

College Athletes and Alcohol Abuse The purpose of this work in writing is to conduct a comprehensive literature review of the research in regards to the quantity and frequency of alcohol consumed by college athletes compared to non-athletes and to investigate the causes of alcohol abuse and its effects on athletic performance and the general health of college athletes. Prevalence of Alcohol Consumption by College Athletes Compared to Non-Athletes Summary of the culture

However, the United States is not a socialist society. Individuals get paid for the work they do and some jobs simply pay more than others. A lawyer is always going to make more than a manager at McDonalds even though both likely work equally as hard for their families. Working hard does not always equal increased pay. College football and basketball are simply the most revenue-generating sports sponsored by the

Paying them to play sports in college would devalue their education and encourage them to continue on a path that will never be profitable in the long-term (Hill, 2007). Conclusion As can be seen, there are two sides to the story. There are good reasons to avoid paying athletes, but there are also good reasons why paying them could be helpful and beneficial. Whichever is decided, it is clear that there

College Athlete Pay The question of payment for college athletes may seem trivial at first glance, when one considers the variety of other, seemingly more pressing issues facing universities today, but upon closer examination it becomes clear that the question of whether or not college athletes should be payed for playing actually cuts to the heart of budget crises plaguing so many American universities. For example, according to Forbes magazine, in

Proper Compensation for College Athletes Introduction College athletes with poorer socioeconomic status typically have issues with position educational outcomes. If college athletes were paid, they would have the ability to provide financial assistance to their struggling families, which would provide them with a higher probability to excel both academically and athletically. There is strong rationale that college athletes should be paid, as colleges earn billions of dollars each year from their athletic