Review: Cesare Beccarias , An Essay on Crimes and Punishments
Today, the U.S. incarcerates more of its citizens than any other industrialized nation, and their confinement is determined by their respective offenses. Although they may not realize it, these individuals owe a significant debt to Cesare Beccarias early work in penology since they are no longer subject to torture and fewer criminals are being executed for capital offenses. To learn more, the purpose of this paper is to provide a review of Cesare Beccaria (1764). An Essay on Crimes and Punishments. This essay is credited with revolutionizing modern penology by advocating for rational, humane, and proportionate punishments. His work emphasized deterrence over retribution, condemned the use of torture and the death penalty, and laid the foundation for criminal justice reforms centered on fairness, legality, and the protection of individual rights, influencing legal systems worldwide. Following the review of the relevant peer-reviewed literature and a critical analysis, a summary of the essays main points and key findings are provided in the conclusion.
Review and Discussion
Today, many prisons in the United States are struggling to cope with overcrowded facilities, razor-thin budgets and staffing shortages that preclude most rehabilitative programs in favor of security. Nevertheless, inmates in modern prisons are treated far better than their counterparts in the not-too-distant past, and they can credit Cesare Beccarias 1764, An Essay on Crimes and Punishments for multiple reforms that changed prisons from the torture chambers that brutalized prisoners and freely applied the death penalty during the 18th century and early 19th centuries (Haney, 2016).
According to Rahe et al. (2024), Beccarias book was one of the more influential texts on penology at the time, especially with respect to the unacceptability of torture as punishment, with long-lasting implications for modern criminal punishments. In this regard, Rahe and his associates at the U.S. National Constitution Center emphasize that, The impact of his little book on the post-revolutionary revisal of the laws in the various nascent American states was considerable (para. 3).
In reality, it is reasonable to suggest that many people at the time were unaware or unconcerned about the horrific conditions in the nations prisons unless they or family members or friends had personal experience at the tender hands of the criminal justice system until Beccarias essay became widely known. This means that like Upton Sinclairs bombshell accounts of the unsanitary and downright disgusting practices of the Chicago meatpacking industry during the early 20th century in The Jungle that resulted in the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act and the Meat Inspection Act in 1906, Beccarias book was the catalyst the fueled fundamental reforms in the prison system and practices that endure to the present. In this regard, Panov...
226).Besides other critical reforms, Beccarias book also generated significant attention concerning the appropriateness of the death penalty in the Age of Enlightenment. Prior to the Enlightenment era, execution was generally accepted as an appropriate method of punishment for a wide array of offenses, most of which are not capital crimes today; the publication of Cesare Beccarias influential work in 1764, though, significantly altered the discourse surrounding capital punishment and the effectiveness of incarceration in both America and internationally (Bessler, 2018).
In fact, two of the most important points made by Beccaria that still influence the criminal justice system today are his calls for the elimination of both torture and the death penalty, addressing these two issues...
…tyrannical. It is upon this, then, that the sovereigns right to punish crimes is founded; that is, upon the necessity of defending the public liberty, intrusted to his care, from the usurpation of individuals. (1764, chap. XV).Taken together, it is clear that humanity is confronted with an authentic dilemma when it comes to criminal justice. The lock em up and throw away the key mindset of the latter half of the 20th century and mandatory sentencing laws which disproportionately affected minorities are proof positive that people want, expect and demand justie, even when they are unable to adjudicate the matters themselves. As Beccaria emphasizes throughout his essay, however, this mindset quickly changes when people become involved with the criminal justice system personally or otherwise. In other words, justice is and always has been a subjective construct that depends on the prevailing Overton window for guidance concerning the most appropriate approach to criminal justice. This means that Beccarias arguments in favor of alternatives to torture and imprisonment warrant ongoing considerations by lawmakers and the legal community alike to make an imperfect system as perfect as possible.
Conclusion
The research showed that Beccaria's An Essay on Crimes and Punishments remains an influential work in the field of criminal justice, challenging long-held beliefs about the purpose of punishment and calling for a more humane, rational approach to criminal law. The research also showed that his emphasis on deterrence over retribution, proportionality in sentencing, and the abolition of torture and capital punishment has left a lasting mark on modern legal systems worldwide. In sum, Beccarias ideas not only influenced the Founding Fathers of the United States but continue to shape debates on criminal justice reform today. While some of his arguments remain controversial, particularly regarding capital punishment, his core principles of fairness, legality, and the protection of…
References
Beccaria, C. (1764). An Essay on Crimes and Punishments. Online Library of Liberty. Retrieved from https://oll.libertyfund.org/.
Bessler, J. D. (2019). Torture and Trauma: Why the Death Penalty Is Wrong and Should Be Strictly Prohibited by American and International Law. Washburn Law Journal, 58(1), 1–101.
Haney, C. (2016). Exoneration and Wrongful Condemnations: Expanding the Zone of Perceived Injustice in Death Penalty Cases. Golden Gate University Law Review, 37(1), 131–173.
Panov, M. (2014). Cesare Beccaria and His the Most Famous and Influential Essay “On Crimes and Punishments” (On the Occasion of 250th Anniversary of the Publication). Law of Ukraine, 9, 226–244.
Rahe, P. et al. (2024). On Crimes and Punishments (1764). The U.S. National Constitution Center. Retrieved from https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/cesare-bonesana-di-beccariaon-crimes-and-punishments-1764.
Sitze, A. (2008). No Mercy. South Atlantic Quarterly, 107(3), 597–608.
Jurisprudence As a theory in law, Jurisprudence involves varying philosophical perceptions about the purposes of law, the legal system and the institutions developed to regulate law. In an effort to understand the basic, fundamental reasoning for law and of legal systems, legal scholars have developed theoretical frameworks within the umbra of jurisprudence. For the purposes of this paper, jurisprudential philosophies will include natural law, legal positivism and constructivist theories of law. Aristotle,
but, according to all other fuqah?', it should be transferred to the public treasury, because it belongs to the Muslims. According to Sh-fi ), the Muslims inherit it on the grounds of their being members of the same group (alta s-b); Ab? Han-fa agrees, on the basis of one of the two traditions reported by him (which includes Sh-fi's opinion), although the other tradition grounds it on friendship (muw-l-t), not
Johnson v Transportation Agency (1986) The two above cases both resulted in a broadening of the scopes and protections of the Civil Rights Act via jurisprudence. In Johnson v Transportation Agency (1986), a very different result was reached that shows the changing nature and understanding of discrimination and how it work in society. The difference in this case is also directly and explicitly related to the differences in the original plaintiffs
Upon becoming a paralegal, I may then begin to make use of the administrative and organizational skills I already possess to enhance my knowledge of the law. Further, other than my many years of experience in administrative positions, I have the advantage of many years in the military in general. Essentially, the law is a vast set of rules to be applied evenly and fairly across varying cultures. The military
Dworkin Jurisprudence The rule of law entails the practical manifestation of our social and philosophical ideals: the rule of law is ideals in action. The rule of law allows public standards to be applied to personal behaviors. The rule of law also requires the proper exercise of power by a governing body. The government enforces the law, but no individual is above the law. The principles of law include the following. The
One criticism is that the corporate and business world is more concerned with self-interest rather then ethics and human rights. "Corporate America, upon which much of the burden of economic growth depends, does what is good for itself. Such self-interest has had the effect of barring women from most executive suites and maintaining status quo gender roles...." (Gibelman, 2003. p 22) This is an aspect which, in combination with
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now