Cognitive Dissonance And Confirmation Bias Research Paper

Confirmation Bias and How it Can Affect People across Age Groups

Introduction

Confirmation bias is a cognitive bias where people tend to search for, interpret, and recall information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs or values, while ignoring or discounting contradictory evidence (Lee et al., 2022). This bias can lead to flawed decision-making, polarization, and overconfidence. Despite being a well-known phenomenon, confirmation bias remains an active area of research, especially regarding its underlying mechanisms, moderators, and consequences.

Confirmation bias can affect people of all ages, from young children to older adults, and can manifest in various domains, such as politics, religion, health, and education (Dickinson & Kakoschke, 2021). Understanding how confirmation bias operates and its impact on different age groups can provide insights into how to reduce its negative effects and promote critical thinking and open-mindedness.

Theory

Confirmation bias is rooted in several cognitive processes, such as selective attention, memory, and reasoning. According to cognitive dissonance theory, people experience discomfort or dissonance when their beliefs or actions are inconsistent with each other or with new information (Dilakshini & Kumar, 2020). To reduce this dissonance, people tend to seek out and accept information that supports their beliefs while rejecting or rationalizing away information that challenges them. This process can create a self-reinforcing cycle that reinforces and amplifies initial beliefs, leading to biased judgments and attitudes.

Research has shown that confirmation bias can be influenced by individual factors, such as personality traits (e.g., openness, need for cognition), cognitive abilities (e.g., intelligence, numeracy), and emotional states (e.g., anxiety, mood) (Lee et al., 2022). Social factors, such as group identity, social norms, and media exposure, can also shape confirmation bias by creating echo chambers and reinforcing shared beliefs (Dickinson & Kakoschke, 2021).

Rationale

Confirmation bias is a pervasive and consequential bias that can lead to various negative outcomes, such as misperceptions, stereotyping, prejudice, and polarization (Williams et al., 2020). Understanding how confirmation bias operates across different age groups can shed light on how to mitigate its negative effects and promote more objective and accurate judgments.

For example, research has shown that confirmation bias can be especially strong in children and adolescents, who are still developing their cognitive and metacognitive skills (Remmerswaal et al., 2014). Children may have less prior knowledge and experience to guide their information processing, and they may have more fearful feelings, making them more susceptible to biased information (Remmerswaal et al., 2014). Additionally, children may rely more on social cues and authority figures, such as parents and teachers, for guidance and validation, which can reinforce their biases.

On the other hand, older adults may have more fixed beliefs and schemas, making them less open to novel or challenging information (Dickinson & Kakoschke, 2021). Older adults may also have less working memory and cognitive flexibility, making it harder to update their beliefs and integrate new information. However, older adults may also have more life experience and expertise in certain domains, which can enhance their ability to detect and correct their biases.

Hypothesis

Based on the above rationale, we hypothesize that confirmation bias will vary across different age groups, with children showing stronger biases towards information that confirms their beliefs, and older adults showing...…and more likely to use strategies to reduce its impact, such as seeking out diverse perspectives and considering alternative explanations.

The study also shows that cognitive factors, such as memory recall and attentional biases, and social factors, such as group polarization and conformity, influenced the expression of confirmation bias across different age groups (Lee et al., 2022; Williams, 2020). For instance, younger adults are more likely to exhibit group polarization effects, while older adults were more likely to exhibit conformity effects.

Overall, the findings suggest that confirmation bias is a complex phenomenon that is influenced by various cognitive and social factors and can affect individuals across different age groups. However, the findings also highlight the potential for interventions that target cognitive and social factors to reduce the impact of confirmation bias and enhance critical thinking and decision-making abilities across all age groups.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study provides valuable insights into how confirmation bias affects individuals across different age groups. The findings suggest that while confirmation bias is prevalent across all age groups, its intensity and expression may vary due to cognitive and social factors. The study highlights the importance of developing effective interventions that target these factors to reduce the impact of confirmation bias and enhance critical thinking and decision-making abilities across all age groups.

The practical implications of the study are significant, as they have the potential to inform interventions in various domains such as education, healthcare, and policymaking. By understanding how confirmation bias affects individuals across different age groups, educators, healthcare professionals, and policymakers can develop evidence-based interventions that address the diverse…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Dickinson, D. L., & Kakoschke, N. (2021). Seeking confirmation? Biased information searchand deliberation in the food domain. Food Quality and Preference, 91, 104189.

Dilakshini, V. L., & Kumar, S. M. (2020). Cognitive dissonance: A psychologicalunrest. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 39(30), 54-60.

Lee, C. C., Lee, H. Y., Yeh, W. C., & Yu, Z. (2022). The impacts of task complexity,overconfidence, confirmation bias, customer influence, and anchoring on variations in real estate valuations. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 26(2), 141-155.

Remmerswaal, D., Huijding, J., Bouwmeester, S., Brouwer, M., & Muris, P. (2014). Cognitivebias in action: Evidence for a reciprocal relation between confirmation bias and fear in children. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45(1), 26-32.

Williams, J. C., Korn, R. M., & Mihaylo, S. (2020). Beyond implicit bias: Litigating race andgender employment discrimination using data from the workplace experiences survey. Hastings LJ, 72, 337.


Cite this Document:

"Cognitive Dissonance And Confirmation Bias" (2023, April 02) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/cognitive-dissonance-confirmation-bias-research-paper-2178249

"Cognitive Dissonance And Confirmation Bias" 02 April 2023. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/cognitive-dissonance-confirmation-bias-research-paper-2178249>

"Cognitive Dissonance And Confirmation Bias", 02 April 2023, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/cognitive-dissonance-confirmation-bias-research-paper-2178249

Related Documents

Cognitive Dissonance Theory and Minimal Justification It was in the 1950's that researchers first postulated the theory known as "minimal justification," a theory that involves "offering the least amount of incentive necessary to obtain compliance." ("SPC 3210, Chapter 7") When one is asked to behave in a certain way that creates cognitive dissonance, the person will develop an aversion for the dissonance and automatically seek ways to reduce it. One way

Cognitive dissonance is disharmony manifested within the human mind, and is quite annoying. Eliot and Devine (1994) sought out to prove that this dissonance that brings us to a disagreeable state of mind is essentially motivation processes at work. More importantly however their work suggested, and to some degree proved, that this mental stress can be effectively reduced by some sort of reduction strategy. For myself self-affirmations, as suggested by

They believe Norwegians have a reputation for being open-minded, respectful, and appreciative of multicultural existence and influence. Breivik's actions made other Norwegians experience cognitive dissonance by behaving outside of the conceptions of Norwegian personalities, behavior, and culture. Again, Breivik does not experience social comparison theory. His self-esteem has not been negatively affected or diminished by being apprehended by Norwegian authorities. He is not altering any behaviors or attitudes. Again, other

Barbie Lost Her Groove Mattel- why managers changed their decision-making over time, and the kinds of cognitive errors therein A formidable business intelligence gathering program identifies threats in good time. However, according to George Day, intelligence is only one aspect of the whole. Day has studied numerous business giants that failed to pick cues from the market and paid dearly for such flips. Day is a marketing professor at the University

With the appropriate controls of variables, the research showed that the recidivism rate of those offenders who got deterrent sentences like 30 months and above, recorded a 29% recidivism rate as compared to those who had relatively shorter terms who had 26% recidivism rates. Proposed herein is the consistency in the punishment handed and not the use of deterrent theory to hand down long sentences or even worse death