Corporate Confirming on Water Risk (Feb 2010) indicates that the Global Confirming Initiative (GRI) G3 Guidelines' five water-related indications (total withdrawal volume by source, ponds considerably impacted by distributions, percentage and total amount of water recycled and used again, total water discharge by quality and destination, and identification water physiques and related habitats impacted by discharges) make the perfect beginning point for assessing and confirming water risks. Within this section, we'll briefly discuss the relevance of all these standards (Power, 2010).
Total water withdrawal by source
Confirming the entire amount of water withdrawn by source adds for knowledge of the general scale of possible influences and threats connected using the company's water use. The entire volume withdrawn offers an indication from the organization's proper size and significance as a user of water and offers to set up a baseline figure for other information relevant to efficiency and employ (Power, 2010).
The systematic effort to watch and enhance the efficient utilization of water within the company is directly associated with water consumption costs. Total water use may also point towards the degree of risk resulting from interruptions to water supplies or elevates the price of water. Clean and freshwater has become progressively scarce, and may influence production procedures that depend on the expanse of water. In regions where ponds are highly restricted, the company's water consumption designs may further impact relations with the suppliers and stakeholders (Power, 2010).
Ponds considerably impacted by withdrawal water
Distributions from the water system can impact the atmosphere by decreasing the water table, reducing amount of water readily available for use, or else changing the ecosystem and its ability to perform its functions in a proper manner (GRI, 2006). Alterations of this nature strongly influence the standard of existence and lifestyles that can sustain in the region, including economic and social effects (Power, 2010).
Percentage and total amount of water recycled and used again
The speed of water reuse and recycling could be a way of measuring efficiency and may demonstrate the prosperity of the business in lessening total water distributions and discharges. Elevated reuse and recycling can lead to a discount and decrease in water consumption, treatment, and clearance expenses (GRI, 2006). The decrease in water consumption through reuse and recycling may also lead to local, national, or regional aims for controlling water supplies (Power, 2010).
Total water discharge by quality and destination
The total amount and excellence of water released through the company is directly associated with environmental influence and operational expenses. By consistently enhancing the standard of released water and/or decreasing volumes, the company can reduce its effect on the nearby atmosphere (GRI, 2006). Unmanaged relieve effluents having a high chemical or nutrient load (primarily nitrogen, phosphorous, or potassium) may have a significant effect on receiving waters. This, consequently, can impact the standard from the water supply open to the business and its relationship with towns along with other water customers (Power, 2010).
Discharging effluents or process water to some facility for treatment not just reduces pollution percentages, but could also lower the company's financial expenses and the chance of regulating activity for non-compliance with environment regulation. All this improves the company's social license to function (Power, 2010).
Total weight of waste by type and disposal method
Recent reports on waste generation figures over many years can also indicate the amount of progress the business makes toward waste reduction efforts. Additionally, it may indicate potential enhancements in process productivity and efficiency. From the financial perspective, the decrease in waste adds straight to decreased expenses for materials, functions, procedures and disposal. Details about the disposal destination disclose the extent that a company has handled the total amount between disposal choices and irregular environment impacts. For instance, land filling and recycling create various kinds of environment and residual impacts. Most waste minimization methods stress on giving priority to choices for reuse, recycling, after which recovery can be completed for additional disposal choices (Power, 2010).
Task 2: GRI of three companies
Australian Co-operative Meals Limited (Dairy Farmers- National Foods Limited took over the Dairy Farmers back in 2008)
The National Foods Limited (Antal et al., 2004; Egan and Frost, 2012) website revealed numerous claims about recent water savings. It reported that each of the Sydney-oriented plants played their roles at the Sydney Water Corporation's 'Every Drop Counts' business structure and accomplished 'outstanding results'. Putting special focus particularly towards the company's Penrith assembly site, the organization reported that even though water usage had elevated from the records in the year 2006, the overall output percentage of water usage as put against each unit puts forward the "best practice" water efficiency of .82 L/L' (recommending production had also elevated for the reason that period). The web site added that in general, 'since June 2000, Penrith has reduced water use by 35 per cent' and numerous initiatives describing this decline were outlined (for instance, setting up a water recycling system). Additionally, it had been reported that related opportunities had led to 'one off' expenses of $84,000 which, consequently, had led to the Penrith currently saving up to $139,000 and 30,800 KL yearly (Egan and Frost, 2012).
National Foods Limited also reported via the website that water government bodies in Queensland had specifically pointed out the company's two production sites for the reason that the city was in need of decreasing the overall water consumption by at least 25%. Elaborating, the company reported that one of the two mentioned sites recorded decreases in water usage by 14% by the end of 2006 and provided good examples of methods to accomplish that. No detail was provided from the progress or efforts to offer the target in the other site (Brown and Fraser, 2006).
The National Foods Limited website was built with a page on their own 'Environment Program', recording the organisation's environment policy. It highlighted the company's concentrating efforts on saving water and enhancing waste water management, showing that the corporate groups had recognized and designed structures and key performance indications to attain mentioned goals. As the company needs 'substantial volumes water to keep high values of food safety and hygiene', they reported that their focus was simultaneously on ensuring that the stay committed to positively reducing their overall water usage as well and continue to strive to attain the best practices for water usage. These aims were attained by getting 'water reduction targets and action plans' (Egan and Frost, 2012).
A Dairy Farmers website was also available in March 2009 (CBSR, 2001; Egan and Frost, 2012) and revealed that the company was engaged in a program for water usage and saving and had already implemented similar programs at the Lidcombe, Booval and Wetherill Park industrial facilities. The website further asserted that in the duration of 12 months, the Co-operative had joined hands and worked on a number of water usage cases with the Sydney Water and also the NSW Environmental Protection Agency in an effort to enhance waste treatment procedures and sites at Wetherill Park (Egan and Frost, 2012).
Goodman Fielder Limited
There is limited information confirming the extent of water usage, administrative activities and usage impacts for Goodman Fielder Limited. The 2008 annual report mentioned that: 'the Company's manufacturing sites are participating in water efficiency management programs conducted by various State Governments. The Company intends to utilise the knowledge obtained during participation in these programs to drive water efficiency improvement across the business' (Egan and Frost, 2012).
There have been similar claims produced in the 2007 and 2006 annual reviews. These reviews did not focus primarily on the water administrative procedures, however, the 2007 annual report did assert that the Goodman Fielder company had been nominated for being a global warming leader within the Food Industry in New Zealand and Australia based on its reaction to the Carbon Disclosure Project. The report also revealed a potential '2008 environment policy' that made claims in line with the use of individual capital i.e. energy, water, re-cycleables and consumables will be utilized effectively and the quantity of waste produced is going to be reduced as much as practically possible. An internet page dedicated to 'Goodman Fielder's Environment Management System' reported the group's method of environment training programs and related data collection and confirming processes by stating that the objective of Goodman Fielder's environment training programs would be to increase awareness [for instance, in the plant level] about environment issues and help produce the enthusiasm needed for the environment programs to be implemented effectively (Egan and Frost, 2012).
Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited
Inghams, an independently possessed Australian company, had limited disclosure on water management with no reports about its water related impacts. An internet page titled 'our philosophy - our environment' incorporated a duplicate stance as that of the company's 'environmental policy'. It mentioned the organisation's resolve for safeguarding the atmosphere extended to the development of the environment management system that's integral to overall management, protection against pollution, concepts of 'reduce, re-use, recycle, recover' (acquisition of recycled items),…