Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Correctional System:
Three different approaches and philosophies to the problem of crime
The three philosophical cornerstones of the corrections system are retribution, rehabilitation, and restoration. However, while most modern theorists of criminal justice believe that there must be some proportion of these elements in all forms of punishment, not all believe that they must be present to the same degree. This paper will advance the idea that ultimately the concepts of rehabilitation and restoration must be more present within the judicial system today while retribution should be deemphasized.
The concept of retribution in the justice system dates back to the classical theory of crime, which stressed that the punishment for a crime must exceed its likely rewards. "For a rational system of criminal justice to work, punishment must be certain, swift, and proportional. The ultimate goal was to insure that the benefits of crime never outweighed the potential pain from punishments the offender would receive. As rational, calculating human beings, most would avoid crime under such a system" (Greek, "The Classical School"). This concept of punishment as deterrence is still present within the justice system, as seen in advocates of the death penalty, 'three strikes and you are out' legislation,...
The presumption is that people will rationally decide that crime does not pay when faced with such punishments. Unfortunately, criminals do not always act out of rational self-interest when pursuing a life of crime.
Other theorists of crime which emphasize the irrational social and psychological dimensions of crime stress the need for rehabilitating the offender. "Although rehabilitation is often considered a type of punishment for criminal offenders, its objectives are therapeutic rather than punitive…the rehabilitative ideal views criminal behavior more like a disease that should be treated with scientific methods available to cure the offender" (Smith 1). The idea is to make the criminal a productive member of society through therapy and education. The stress in this model is upon how conditions such as poverty and untreated mental illness motivate crime: by addressing these factors, the criminal can be reincorporated back into the social fold.
A third theory of how to address the problem of crime and punishment is that of restorative justice. Of course, justice is always concerned with protecting the public from potential criminals but restorative justice is unique in the way…
Works Cited
Greek, C. "The Classical School." FSU. 2005. 21 Apr 2014.
http://criminology.fsu.edu/crimtheory/week3.htm
"Our broken justice system." Fair Sentencing of Youth. 21 Apr 2014.
http://fairsentencingofyouth.org/the-issue/crime-and-safety/
http://pubpages.unh.edu/~nicks/pdf/Rehabilitation.pdf
http://www.restorativejustice.org/university-classroom/01introduction
Restorative Justice Individual restorative justice paper: Case study Traditionally, the debate about the purpose of the justice system has revolved around the question of whether punishment should be retributive or rehabilitative in nature. Those who favor a retributive model stress the need for criminals to pay their debts to society and view the purpose of the justice system as primarily to punish convicts through confinement and forcing them to work. Those who
Restorative Justice Approaches Reduce Youth Offending Restorative justice is a new paradigm within the criminal justice, particularly in the context of youth offenders. The philosophy behind restorative justice is to consider the juvenile's interests to develop them into beneficial citizens, and it augments the principle behind juvenile justice and corrections. Restorative justice approaches provide the juvenile justice system with leniency when approaching youth offenders while at the same time holding
Restorative Justice: How Just is the Philosophy? The principle of restorative justice was first created as an alternative to the two dominant philosophies of corrections: retribution and rehabilitation. The retributive view of corrections suggests that the purpose of corrections is to punish the offender. The rehabilitative view suggests that the purpose of corrections is to change the character of the offender for the better and prevent future crimes from taking place.
Supermax PrisonsOne of the justifications for supermax prisons is that retributive justice calls for it (Mears & Resig, 2006). However, another is that �they promote higher levels of prison order throughout the systems in which they are used� (Mears & Resig, 2006, p. 33). In other words, they are said to reduce prison misconduct. The problem with the latter justification is that there is not enough empirical evidence to support
When an offender is paroled, special conditions may be placed by the parole board upon the individual, to ensure that the rehabilitative process began in prison continues. "In addition to establishing the standard rules which include paying restitution, maintaining contact with their parole agent, submitting to searches and not leaving the state without permission" ("Division of Juvenile Justice: FAQs, 2008, CDCR). These special stipulations may include counseling for substance abuse
Court Management Policy Proposal The retributive and rehabilitative approaches of justice are dominant, and research suggests that they have disappointed the juvenile legal system. The rise in youth crime and critiques of the juvenile legal approaches has led to demands for reforms in the way of charging youth offenders. The retributive approach of justice suggests that juvenile offenses are violations against the state and holds the state accountable for sentencing youth