Expectations Change That Led Revolution
Compare Contrast Expectations Change Led Revolution 1917/Civil War Realities
How the ideological changes that accompanied the revolution shaped the arts/culture of Russia/USSR
The social and economic systems experienced tremendous transitions occasioning to stress among the populations of Russia. The great reforms formed a cautious path to modernization and reform. Through emancipation, peasants were allowed to own pieces of land and had the personal freedom to share their pieces of land. However, these peasants were not happy with the settlement programs based on emancipation because they held the belief that they were legal owners of the land. This claim became a major source of discontent leading to the 1917 peasant revolution (Sampson & Marienhoff, 2008).
Russia experienced a turning point at the onset of 1917; the nation was prepared for revolution and indeed, they saw the first revolution, which brought rapid changes and increased social opportunities. Huge traffics of peasants migrated from agrarian to industrialized working environments while many other relocated, thus creating more space for increasing urban workforce. There was an increase in the number of white-collar middle class employees, professionals and businesspersons. They comprised of engineers, journalists, teachers, lawyers, and doctors. The economy was increasingly changing even forcing the noble people to develop new mechanisms of subsisting. On the other hand, contemporaries were submerged in discussions about new emerging classes (capitalists and proletarians) although the classes were also divided based on belief, gender, ethnicity, age and social status (University of Pittsburgh & American Political Science Association, 2005).
It became evident that speaking about boundaries and social groups was becoming harder. Groups were fractured in a variety of ways, the boundaries, which defined them became invisible as peasants, gentry professionals, and employee intellectuals were increasingly migrating. Everyone felt the transforming life texture; the spread of commercial culture resurfaced the materials of life including machines, clocks, fashion, advertisements, and buildings nurturing the desire for new objects. These changes evidence the fact that the revolution was a profound social revolution (Rossman, 2010). The state and the peasants did not benefit in any way from emancipation. Rapid population increase, which doubled and productivity decreased thus leading to increased hardships. The rural peasants lived in varied economic conditions with no economic gains. In addition, at the turn of the century, 80% of the population comprised of peasants living at the...
Families perished because of illness, poor local conditions and large regimes were swept away by periodic
disasters such as famine. Persisting land disparities,
poverty among peasants, differences in privileges and
wealth between landowners and peasants prompted the peasants to become violent in the 1917 revolution (Sampson & Marienhoff, 2008).
At the beginning of 1880s,
leaders in Russia realized that it was unnecessary for the republic of Russia to remain in the agrarian century. It was essential for the country to embrace
industrialization if they desired to sustain a great economic status in the world. Through steps taken by the
government, industrialization was spurred introducing new measures such as direct investment, fiscal policies, and tariffs for private entrepreneurs. A phenomenal industrial development was witnessed in the nation of Russia (Rossman, 2010). Industrial revolution took
place in Russia during the decades of
imperialism in Russia with no future economic hopes. Industrialization came along with massive social constraints on the people. Despite the fact that people were already poor, they were pushed down the poverty line by higher taxes, prices, and tariffs. These stresses become evident while the country was headed towards developing enormous
industries, which had the possibility of reinventing the future economy of Russia.
The country paid heavily for the services of industrialization, and such excess costs were destructive to the Russian
society, precisely in
agriculture. Industrialization led to enormous social transformations and political implications. The traditional forms of estates hierarchy of peasant, merchant, clergy and noble became redundant after they were replaced with new forms of social structured founded on economic and profession functions of the new age of industrialization. Courtesy of this new structure, new aspirations and identities emerged, which played a key role in the
success of the revolution as well as the outcome (University of Pittsburgh & American Political Science Association, 2005).
The new form of
social structure…
