Juvenile Death Penalty Sentencing Is Term Paper

PAGES
6
WORDS
1651
Cite

" (Potter, 1999) Supreme Court finally strikes down juvenile executions

On Mar. 1, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down once and for all juvenile executions in the United States, abandoning nations such as Nigeria, Congo, China, Pakistan and others whose records of human rights abuse are staggering.

The 5-4 decision reverses the death sentences of about 70 juvenile murderers and bars states from seeking to execute minors for future crimes.

The executions, the court said, violate the Eighth Amendment's strict ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

The ruling continues the court's practice of narrowing the scope of the death penalty, which justices reinstated in 1976. The court in 1988 outlawed executions for those 15 and younger when they committed their crimes. Three years ago, the Supreme Court justices banned executions of the mentally retarded.

Tuesday's ruling prevents states from making 16- and 17-year-olds eligible for execution.

The age of 18 is the point where society draws the line for many purposes between childhood and adulthood. It is, we conclude,...

...

(Roper, 2005)
Juvenile offenders have been executed in recent years in only a few other countries, including Iran, Pakistan, China and Saudi Arabia. Kennedy cited international opposition to the practice.

It is proper that we acknowledge the overwhelming weight of international opinion against the juvenile death penalty, resting in large part on the understanding that the instability and emotional imbalance of young people may often be a factor in the crime," he wrote. (Roper, 2005)

So, in this case, the thought that executing minorities is cruel was vindicated finally.

Bibliography

Amnesty International. 1998. Juveniles and the Death Penalty: Execution Worldwide Since 1990. November.

Berk, R.; R. Weiss; and J. Boger. 1993. Chance and the Death Penalty. Law and Society Review 27: 89-110.

Bureau of Justice Statistics.1997. Capital Punishment 1996. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Capital Punishment Research Group. 1998.. Report. Headland: AL: Capital Punishment Research Group (January 12).

Gross, S. And R. Mauro. 1989. Death and Discrimination: Racial Disparities in Capital Sentencing. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press,

Paternoster, R. 1991. Capital Punishment in America.…

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Amnesty International. 1998. Juveniles and the Death Penalty: Execution Worldwide Since 1990. November.

Berk, R.; R. Weiss; and J. Boger. 1993. Chance and the Death Penalty. Law and Society Review 27: 89-110.

Bureau of Justice Statistics.1997. Capital Punishment 1996. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Capital Punishment Research Group. 1998.. Report. Headland: AL: Capital Punishment Research Group (January 12).


Cite this Document:

"Juvenile Death Penalty Sentencing Is" (2005, March 01) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/juvenile-death-penalty-sentencing-is-62932

"Juvenile Death Penalty Sentencing Is" 01 March 2005. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/juvenile-death-penalty-sentencing-is-62932>

"Juvenile Death Penalty Sentencing Is", 01 March 2005, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/juvenile-death-penalty-sentencing-is-62932

Related Documents

An interesting and similar development in juvenile justice is the issue of life imprisonment as a cruel and unusual sentence for juvenile offenders. This issue is addressed by Mark Sherman (2009). Sherman states that Joe Sullivan was 13 years old when he attacked and raped an elderly woman. The court judged him as incorrigible and therefore sentenced him to life without parole. Another example is that of Terrance Graham, who

The debate over the death penalty remains and the Supreme Court will most likely be asked decide such cases for years to come. Summary and Conclusion The purpose of this discussion was to examine several landmark Supreme Court cases and explain the evolution of capital punishment jurisprudence from 1972 to the present. The research focused on the cases of Furman v Georgia, Woodson v. North Carolina, Gregg v Georgia, McCleskey v

However, on the contradicting side, the question is "Can death penalty really deter criminals?." Several studies show it does not. An online source indicates the following evidences. From 1976 to 1996, the number of executions per year in the United States has increased from 0 to just under 60. The homicide rate per 100,000 population has remained constant at just under 10. Criminologists who belong to the American Society of Criminology,

Death Penalty for Juvenile Offenders Supreme Court by a majority decision on March 1, 2005 in Roper v. Simmons held that death penalty for juveniles was "cruel and unusual" and as such the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution forbid the execution of offenders who were under the age of 18 when their crimes were committed. The action reversed the death sentences of 72 convicted murderers in the U.S.

Statistics show that black murderers are far more likely than white murderers to get the death penalty, especially if the victim was white. Blacks make up 12% of the population but 40% of the population on death row, as noted. Georgia can serve as a case in point. Statistics show that a black man accused of killing a white person in Georgia is substantially more likely to receive the

death penalty and minors - recent Supreme Court finding Death Penalty was extensively applied in the olden times across the world. The modern crusade for banning of capital punishment started in the 18th century with the writings of Montesquieu and also Voltaire. Some of the nations which took a lead in abolishing capital punishment are Venezuela in 1863, San Marino in 1865 and Costa Rica in 1877. Presently, more than