The factors affecting cost are numerous and not always easily identifiable; in addition to the purchasing of bilingual textbooks and other instructional supplies, there is often a perception that bilingual instruction leads to a greatly increased workload and number of class hours, and therefore a greater overall strain on the often-tight budgets of public education institutions and districts (Mora 2006). It is primarily the transitional costs, however, that many communities view as a barrier to implementing bilingual education; the reallocation of funds for such a purpose is highly unpopular in areas where students are not receiving basic educational needs already (Hu 2008; Mora 2006; NABE 2009).
The study conducted of Guatemalan bilingual education programs speaks to this issue to some degree, though its ramifications in that country are quite different tan what is seen in the United States. Patrinos and Velez (2009) found that educational costs in Guatemala were actually lowered in areas and communities that provided bilingual education programs simply due to the lower rates of students repeating courses or entire grades. That is, students receiving bilingual instruction performed so much better than those in Spanish-only settings -- and arguably those receiving Spanish-only instruction were so under-served -- that the costs of providing bilingual education were more than offset by the efficiency and success of the instruction (Patrinos & Velez 2009). In the United States, however, non-native English speakers not receiving bilingual education are more likely to drop out than repeat grades (Krashen 1997).
It must be admitted that, at least on the surface, considering bilingual education in the United States from a purely financial perspective leaves little doubt as to its inadvisability. Education, however, has never been solely or even primarily a financial concern, nor should it be viewed from such a perspective. The overall academic success that bilingual education programs have been shown to enhance makes the additional costs and/or the reallocation of financial and other resources to the development and implementation of such programs very worthwhile in the long-term (Krashen 1997; Tucker 1999; Patrinos & Velez 2009). Public education, especially in a democracy, is the very foundation of civil liberties and progression, and cost cannot be allowed to limit it.
Furthermore, it could also be argued that bilingual education programs actually provide an economic benefit to communities in the long-term. Though short-term savings like those described by Patrinos and Velez (2009) from the more efficient and effective education provided by bilingual instruction do not directly apply to the United States, the long-term benefits of having a more diversifiable workforce is sure to reap certain fiscal rewards (Mora 2006; NABE 2009). When more people are able to conduct business with other nationalities, cultures, and speakers of foreign languages, the better off the overall economy will be. Individual communities an also see their economic situation improve both by facilitating such business and encouraging...
Financial and other practical considerations can be regarded as a necessary evil; the real world cannot change on a whim and where resources simply do not exist they cannot be easily conjured up, but if a change is necessary than the resources must be found or created somehow, regardless of the time or effort necessary to complete the task. Likewise, ideological concerns cannot be allowed to get in the way of a solid, complete, and beneficial education. Politics, whether individually or socially based, have no place in the education system, and bilingual instruction should not be stopped simply because some individuals feel that it will force a loss of their culture -- a successful culture needs to accept the realities of its situation.
The facts of the situation regarding bilingual education is that students emerge from classrooms and programs where bilingual instruction takes place better prepared to engage in a diverse world, and better prepared academically in general (CABE 2009; Krashen 1997; Patrinos & Velez 2009; Tucker 1999). There is some evidence that bilingual education actually makes students more receptive to new ways of thinking and new types of pattern perception, making learning and the analysis of data simpler tasks (Krashen 1997; Tucker 1999). With such obvious academic benefits, it is more than a little disconcerting that bilingual education programs are not more widespread. Though there are certainly legitimate concerns regarding the development and implementation of bilingual education programs, both practical and otherwise, such concerns are far outweighed by the benefits such education provides.
Bilingual education enhances both the individual students who receive bilingual instruction and the communities in which these students live. The rewards for the development and implementation of bilingual education programs are both esoteric in the form of increased academic ability and preparedness, as well as practical in the form of monetary gain over the long-term. Concerns regarding the loss or degradation of culture and heritage due to bilingual education are largely unfounded, and evidence shows that bilingual instruction actually enhances ties to cultural and linguistic heritage. Bilingual education will help to bring the world together, and to make it run smoother.
CABE. (2009). California association for bilingual education official website. Accessed 11 September 2009. http://www.bilingualeducation.org/
EPE. (2004). "English language learners." Editorial projects in education research center. Accessed 11 September 2009. http://www.edweek.org/rc/issues/english-language-learners/
Hu, G. (2008). "The misleading academic discourse on Chinese-English bilingual education in China." Review of educational reearch 78(20, pp. 195-231.
Krashen, S. (1997). "Why bilingual education?" ERIC digest. Accessed 11 September 2009. http://www.ericdigests.org/1997-3/bilingual.html
Mora, J. (2006). "Identifying fallacious arguments in the bilingual education debate." San Diego state university. Accessed 11 September 2009. http://edweb.sdsu.edu/people/jmora/Prop227/BEFallacies.htm
NABE. (2009). National association for bilingual education official website. Accessed 11 September 2009. http://www.nabe.org/
Patrinos, H. & Velez, e. (2009). "Costs and benefits of bilingual education in Guatemala: A partial analysis." International journal of educational development, 29(6),…
Ianco-Worrell (1972), for example, found that children who are exposed to a bilingual environment from an early age are more skilled at learning new words and their meanings in their first language. Of course, there are other ways to help children increase their vocabulary in their first language. However, those other methods do not also bestow the many other benefits of bilingualism. And while there are additional costs to bilingual
In terms of efficacy, Krashen addresses the position that bilingual education is not as effective as suggested by its proponents. The evidence presented by this position is however not sufficiently convincing to make a substantial case for immersion programs as being superior to bilingual curricula. Krashen admits that there are still a number of problems associated with bilingual education that need to be addressed. The largest of these is the accessibility
Bilingual Education Predicting the effect of bilingual education on student outcomes with the work done by Huddy and Sears, "Opposition to Bilingual Education: Prejudice or the Defense of Realistic Interests?" is problematical. The authors investigated the bases for parental prejudice against bilingual education; they did not investigate in any detail what the educational outcomes might be for the children involved. They made only incidental reference to the possibility that Latino, African-American
While students in two-way immersion programs and other bilingual education programs may have the occasion to feel bored when they are not be instructed in their language, teachers can create an environment in which they are stimulated. The National Association for Bilingual Education (2004) notes that the involvement of parents, materials provided by the school, and the support that the program gets are all important factors in the success
Bilingual Education The first federal Bilingual Education Act (BEA) was signed into law in 1968. This study sought to determine what effects the BEA had on local and state school districts in California, some who had previously initiated programs to address the Limited English Speaking (LES) students who were becoming an integrated part of the educational system in California. The study is important to the proposed paper in that it shows
Bilingual Education Methods: Pros and Cons Once upon a time, perhaps, the art of teaching was relatively strait-forward. Each teacher used their own style, or that which had been handed down to them by those they learned from. While certainly a certain degree of theory has always been involved in teaching (after all, the so-called Socratic method of teaching was debated centuries before the birth of Christ, and is still cropping