Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Moreover, evidence gathered in criminal case can now be more easily shared - without a court order - for "intelligence" purposes with intelligence agencies such as the CIA even if the information is about an American citizen ("Threats to Civil Liberties").
The exercise of rights generates costs, and it is these costs that are often in conflict. Davis and Silver agree that a proper balance must be found between freedom and control and that civil liberties cannot simply be trodden upon.
Lewis cites research documenting that the general public's fears had diminished within a month's time, to the point where less than one-third of Americans were highly concerned about terrorism or safety in their communities, after September 11th.
This lack of fear equates to a lesser desire for increased security, and therefore a reluctance to give up such fundamental civic liberties like privacy. The cost, at this point, far outweighs the results.
Conclusion:
In the end, the world has changed since the terrorist attacks on September 11th, especially for Americans. No longer is there the feeling of utter security within the invisible borders. And, steps do need to be taken to ensure that attacks like that cannot happen again. "The fundamental purposes of the federal government, as enumerated in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution, are to 'establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty....' (Lewis). However, these duties often come into conflict with one another, when events of "national import, urgent peril, and...
Since the events of September 11th, providing common defense and securing the blessings of liberty have been at war, with the loss of liberty being at the mercy of common defense.
As Davis and Silver quote Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, following the attacks on September 11th, "We're likely to experience more restrictions on our personal freedom than has ever been the case in our country.... It will cause us to re-examine some of our laws pertaining to criminal surveillance, wiretapping, immigration, and so on." Justice O'Connor had clear insight into what a post-September 11th society would be like. Personal freedoms have been restricted and laws allowing law enforcement and government agencies to conduct covert surveillance have been loosened, all in the name of the War Against Terror. However, millions of people having their civil liberties encroached upon, to better facilitate the capture of a scant few, is not the answer.
Since September 11th, increased governmental secrecy, erosion of fundamental checks and balances, and a loss of privacy have seriously undermined the principles this great nation was founded upon.
References
Davis, D. & Sliver, B. "Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America." American Journal of Political Science 48(1) Jan 2005: 28-46. JSTOR. JSTOR. University of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ. November 29, 2006 http://www.jstor.org.
Lewis, C. "The Clash Between Security and Liberty in the U.S. Response to Terror." Public Administration Review. Jan/Feb 2005: 18-30. ProQuest database. ProQuest. University of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ. November 29, 2006 http://proquest.umi.com.
Stephens, T. "Civil Liberties after September 11: Background of a Crisis." Guild Practitioner 61(1) Winter 2004: 4. ProQuest database. ProQuest. University of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ. November 29, 2006 http://proquest.umi.com.
Threats to Civil Liberties Post September 11th: Secrecy, Erosion of Privacy, Danger of Unchecked Government. No date. ACLU. November 29, 2006 http://www.aclu.org/natsec/gen/14346prs20011214.html.
While most see these and other similar reforms as necessary, serving merely as a legal upgrade for law enforcement, one provision of the act's section regarding wireless communication has created much controversy. This section allows foreign intelligence agencies to wiretap citizen's phones and computers without a court order. Bringing the country back to the short-lived standard of 1928, when a fraction of the technology that is used on a
It is the harsh reality of life in post-9/11 America that the global terror continues to exact a high toll on American lives and interests at home and abroad, and the terrorist agenda continues to include attacks in the future that may involve weapons of mass destruction. Furthermore, these types of diminutions of basic constitutional rights are not unique in American history, and President Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas
DOJ Policy Changes The plethora of commentary regarding the terrorist attacks that occurred on 9/11 has created much confusion. The overwhelming quality of the circumstances altered the collective psyche of America in deep and profound ways. In many cases these changes have provided solutions, problems and more questions. The purpose of this essay is to discuss how 9/11 changed criminal justice policies in the United States. The essay will argue that although
The milestone that the Civil Rights Movement made as concerns the property ownership is encapsulated in the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which is also more commonly referred to as the Fair Housing Act, or as CRA '68. This was as a follow-up or reaffirmation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, discussed above. It is apparent that the Civil Rights Act of 1866 outlawed discrimination in property and housing there
783). Gore sees a parallel between the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II, after the attack upon Pearl Harbor and the treatment of Arab-Americans in the wake of the Bush Administration's fear-mongering and validation of public prejudices against Muslims. (This attitude conveyed from the top also fostered prejudice amongst ordinary citizens: A commonly-cited complaint of some airplane passengers is that too many 'non obvious' suspects are subject to routine
September 11th shocked and enraged many people, in the United States and around the world. With that shock came a cry for change, a tightening of the open and free society in which we live. September 11th was an unprecedented occurrence, leaving many people personally affected and still others traumatized by the severity of the events and the seemingly senseless act against civilians. "What happened on September 11 is