How Moses Used Various Leadership Styles To Lead The Israelites To The Promised Land Research Paper

Effective Leadership and the Case of Moses

It is well documented that effective leadership is a critical component of organizational success. A growing body of scholarship confirms that leaders who exhibit effective leadership skills have the potential to transform their followers in ways that help them grow as well as helping achieve their organization's goals. Not surprisingly, organizational theorists are always searching for good examples of effective leaders to support their views and theories. For this purpose, the biblical account of Moses provides a valuable case study of effective leadership. Moses exhibited visionary, authoritative, transformational and servant leadership style that motivated and inspired his followers to achieve their full potential. In addition, Moses also adapted his leadership style to different situations in ways that are reflective of situational leadership. However, Moses' shortcomings, such as his lack of confidence and communication problems, serve as important reminders of the challenges leaders face in achieving their personal and professional goals. To learn more about this major biblical leader, the purpose of this paper is to describe the specialized approaches of Moses as well as his failings as a leader that modern Christians can learn from. Finally, a discussion concerning the limitations that Christians have on bringing their faith into the workplace is followed by a summary of the research in the conclusion.

Review and Discussion

By most measures, Moses was a great leader in multiple ways that reflect the key tenets of mainstream leadership theories today. For instance, in many cases, the leadership style used by Moses was transformational in nature. For example, Moses had a clear vision of the Promised Land and he was committed to leading the Israelites there using whatever means were necessary. These attributes are some of the main characteristics of transformational leadership. For instance, conceptualized as a large corporation, Moses kept his eye on the prize for the Jewish People, Inc. by consistently transforming the organization by articulating a better vision for the future as well as taking concrete steps to further its achievement. These actions helped forge a sense of trust between him and his followers that was critical given their dire circumstances (Capps, 2009). In this regard Alavi et al. (2022) point out that, Transformational leadership creates organizational trust which then positively impacts organizational performance in times of crisis (p. 324).

In addition, Moses also used a visionary leadership style to inspire his followers to persevere by setting high expectations for them as a people to the Promised Land and challenging them to achieve their full potential as the Chosen People as promised by God (Arnow, 2006). The biblical accounts of Moses, though, also make it clear that the Jewish peoples faith was sorely tested time and again, and the seeds of doubt were planted despite the daily miracles that God provided the Jews in the form of manna, the unstoppable power of the Ark of the Covenant, parting the Red Sea, as well as working numerous other miracles through Moses. This eventuality has some interesting modern parallels, and personal experience and a growing body of scholarship confirm that persuading large numbers of people to achieve a common goal even one in which they have a vested interest -- is a challenging enterprise for the most effective leaders. In other words, organizational leaders are only as good as their last miracle.

Despite these challenges, Moses also developed an environment wherein his followers felt sufficiently comfortable to frankly share their ideas and concerns with him. Given that the stakes could not be higher for the Jewish people with their religion and lives on the line, it was obviously necessary to hear from his followers, even if this honest airing of differing opinions did not always sway him from his original thinking. This leadership approach is also consistent with transformational leadership since it empowered his followers to take ownership of their work and become active contributors to their eventual success (Ben-Hur & Jonsen, 2012). This is what great transformational leaders do -- they listen to their advisors and then make the best decision they can and commit the resources that are needed to achieve it.

Beyond the transformational aspects, Moses also exhibited a servant leadership style that was highly effective. Indeed, Moses is a prime example of a servant leader who was also a spiritual leader. Servant leadership theory is based on the idea that leaders should prioritize serving and empowering their followers. Like transformational leadership, servant leaders also encourage their subordinates to share their opinions and make independent decisions, but there is also an emphasis on identifying mutually agreed upon innovative ways of working and solving problems (Khan et al, 2023).

Like Moses, modern servant leaders also establish and maintain close relationships with their followers, providing timely feedback and taking care of their personal and professional needs when necessary (Khan et al., 2023). In contrast to most other ledership theories, servant leadership is a unique self-sacrificing type of leadership behavior that fosters trust and enables followers to grow and develop. In sum, servant leadership begins with the natural feeling of wanting to serve first (Khan, 2023).

In addition, effective servant leaders should also incorporate spiritual leadership qualities that...…are leaders who involve their followers in decision-making and seek input and feedback from them

Moses appointed leaders from each tribe to assist him in leading and making decisions, and also sought counsel from his father-in-law, Jethro.

Finally, bringing one's faith into the workplace can present a number of challenges for Christians. One major challenge is finding a balance between expressing one's beliefs and respecting the beliefs of others. It can be difficult to know how to navigate conversations about religion in a professional setting without coming across as pushy or judgmental. Another challenge is dealing with potentially hostile or unsupportive work environments (Enderle, 1997).

Some workplaces may not be receptive to discussions about religion, or may even actively discourage it. This can create a sense of isolation or alienation for Christians who wish to integrate their faith into their work lives. Finally, Christians may struggle with the tension between their values and the values of the company they work for. In some cases, this may require difficult decisions about whether to speak out against practices or policies that conflict with their beliefs. In the final analysis, Christians can and should bring their religious beliefs and values into their workplaces, but they must do so with prudence and seek to contribute positively to a worldwide ethic without imposing their views on others.

Religious diversity in the workplace is beneficial and can be managed through human resource policies reflecting organizational values and guiding principles to influence positive social change (Jolliffe & Foster, 2022). Workplace policies and relevant state and federal laws may limit the extent to which Christians and members of other faiths can share their religious views with others. Therefore, it is important for organizations of all sizes and types to have clear policies and guidelines in place to ensure fairness and inclusivity for employees of all faiths (Jolliffe & Foster, 2022).

Conclusion

The research showed that the biblical account of Moses provides a valuable case study of effective leadership. For example, Moses exhibited a transformational and servant leadership style that motivated and inspired his followers to achieve their full potential. Likewise, he also adapted his approach to different situations. It is important to note, however, that modern scholars tend to focus only on the positive attributes of effective leaders, but even though he was an esteemed man of God, Moses was also just a human being. His shortcomings provide a valuable reminder that leadership is a complex and challenging endeavor that requires constant self-reflection and growth. By studying leaders like Moses, it is possible to learn from their successes and failures and to…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Alavi, S., Ehlig, P. A., & Habel, J. (2022). Transformational and transactional sales leadership during a global pandemic. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 42(4), 324–338.

Arnow, D. (2006). The Passover Haggadah: Moses and the Human Role in Redemption. Judaism, 55(3/4), 4–28.

Barro, J. H. (2015). Moses: Leader and Liberator. Revista Batista Pioneira, 4(1), 137–159.

Ben-Hur, S., & Jonsen, K. (2012). Ethical leadership: lessons from Moses. Journal of Management Development, 31(9), 962–973.

Capps, D. (2009). Forty Years with Moses. Pastoral Psychology, 58(5/6), 451–462.

Enderle, G. (1997). In Search of a Common Ethical Ground: Corporate Environmental Responsibility from the Perspective of Christian Environmental Stewardship. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 173–181.

Friedman, H. H., Fischer, D., & Schochet, S. (2017). Humility and Tone at the Top. International Leadership Journal, 9(2), 54–79.

Gorringe, T. (2007). Three Texts about Moses: Numbers 12, 16 and 20. Expository Times, 118(4), 177–179.

Jolliffe, P., & Foster, S. (2022). Different Reality? Generations’ and Religious Groups’ Views of Spirituality Policies in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(2), 451–470.

Khan, N. U., Zada, M., & Estay, C. (2023). Servant leadership and employee prosocial rule-breaking: The underlying effects of psychological safety and compassion at work. PLoS ONE, 17(4), 1–17.

Lynch, J. A., & Friedman, H. H. (2013). Servant Leader, Spiritual Leader: The Case for Convergence. Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics, 10(2), 87–95.

Shaevel, A. (2021). Amalek, the Land of Israel and Palestine, the People who Live Here, and the Occupation. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics & Culture, 26(1/2), 134–141.

Štrba, B. (2021). Sight or Skin? Revisiting Deuteronomy 34:7c. Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 83(1), 1–17.

Wilson, S. M. (2020). Fear, Love, and Leadership: Posing a Machiavellian Question to the Hebrew Bible. Journal of Biblical Literature, 139(2), 233–253.

Zivotofsky, A. Z. (1994). The leadership qualities of Moses. Judaism, 43(3), 258.


Cite this Document:

"How Moses Used Various Leadership Styles To Lead The Israelites To The Promised Land" (2023, May 06) Retrieved April 28, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/moses-various-leadership-styles-lead-israelites-promised-land-research-paper-2178512

"How Moses Used Various Leadership Styles To Lead The Israelites To The Promised Land" 06 May 2023. Web.28 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/moses-various-leadership-styles-lead-israelites-promised-land-research-paper-2178512>

"How Moses Used Various Leadership Styles To Lead The Israelites To The Promised Land", 06 May 2023, Accessed.28 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/moses-various-leadership-styles-lead-israelites-promised-land-research-paper-2178512

Related Documents

However this philosophy has been proved to be wrong. Besides a few traits like intuition and sensing, all the leadership traits involve our conscious decisions and behaviors. A person can adopt any leadership and decision making style to be effective and productive based on the work environment and the people he is working with. Here are some recommendations for the self-improvement with respect to leadership and decision making: The leader

Leadership Style Inventory Leadership crises have been brewing since the past century. Evidently, the latest global economic lapses of financial markets raised a higher need for an effective leadership than it had been before. These crises led to a call for contemporary organizations to scrutinize or assess the leadership potential among their employees and new recruitments. Following the current changes in organizational rules and business games, as well as randomly emerging

Leadership style of the CEO of Google Inc. using situational leadershi Larry Page and Sergey Brin met at the Stanford University in 1995 and by 1996, they built first search initially called BackRub, which used links to establish the importance of the individual web pages. They continued working on the search engine, and in 1998, they founded the now worldwide-established Google Inc. Company (Larson, 2010). The company packs a lot considering

Leadership Styles Relationship- and Task-Based Leadership Styles In leading groups and organizations, managers and leaders alike adopt different kinds of styles or approaches to be able to achieve specific objectives. These objectives could include establishing rapport and cohesion within a group, be it from a team or organizational level. Another objective that a leader could aspire to achieve is to focus on accomplishing the task or work at hand, regardless of the

Leadership Style and Traits
PAGES 13 WORDS 3665

Leadership Style and Traits Leadership Styles and Traits Captain D. Michael Abrashoff was one of the graduates from U.S. Naval Academy and he was also an assistant of military as a former secretary of defense. Though in 2001 he left his profession of navy and turned to a founder of grassroots leadership. (Barr, Frumi, 2002) After leaving that, he wrote a book on his management styles that he followed up throughout in his

Leadership Style: What Do People Do When they are Leading? Hewlett Packard (HP) remains one of the most successful computer and related services company in the Diversified Computer Systems industry. In this text, I concern myself with the leadership style of Meg Whitman -- the CEO of HP. In so doing, I will amongst other things analyze how her leadership style aligns with the company's culture. I will also examine Whitman's