The UAE and Israel: Stabilizing Factor for the Future of the Middle East

Introduction

The UAE is now looking to stabilize the future for the Middle East, as it pivots towards a formal relationship with Israel due to the Abraham Accords. The hope is that this new relationship will support growth through tourism, technology sharing, economic integration, and security operations. Stability in the Middle East has long been a pernicious problem, with some states and regional actors opposed to peace at all costs. These groups have been growing in power and influence for years, but the UAE has also been growing steadily and its wealth through oil exports has made it into an equally powerful and influential state. However, the rising risk of war, terror, attack, and subversion remains. Therefore, the UAE has viewed now as a prime opportunity to forge an alternative path that deviates from the historical norm. Even though Israel has worked closely with some Gulf States on security matters for years, no relationships have been formalized. There has always been hesitancy for any Gulf State to appear too close to Israel for fear of upsetting some Arab populations. But the UAE has now declared in a straight-forward manner that it is tired of Arab leaders leading their populations around by the nose, taking money from other Arab states while doing nothing for the people they are supposed to be helping. This has been the UAEs major criticism of Palestinian leaders. Its hope now, with the Accords in place, is that it will serve to bring other communities out of the cold, dark misery of in-fighting and terror to the warm table of peace and win-win solutions that benefit everyone.

Stability

Although some view the Abraham Accords as idealistic in nature, the formalization of ties with Israel does have some pragmatic benefits that will ensure the vitalization of UAE and Israel both for years to come. New investments will be made, trade will flow in both directions, tourism will be supported benefiting local communities of both states, and cultural understanding will begin to be achieved. All of this is possible thanks to an open-minded, open relationship between the leaders of the two states. It is this kind of trust and willingness to collaborate that can serve as the foundation for stability, even in a region as full of problems as the Middle East. The fact is that states have to start somewhere in putting the past behind them and building a new future. That start, while criticized by some, can at least to be said in theory to be found in the Abraham Accords.

Not all states view it is a good move, however. Iran, the enemy of both UAE and Israel, sees it as an affront. Hamas and Hezbollah have denounced it. Some Arab communities believe the UAE is abandoning them by joining forces with Israelbut the UAE argues that these communities are looking at the matter through the wrong lens. Stability does not come by holding onto grudges and never forgiving or forgetting. It comes by assessing the needs of the here and now and working with partners who also stand to benefit from setting aside grievances and seeing how they might win from new friendships.

Abdulla (2021) notes that the two pillars of the Accords are pragmatism on one hand and idealism on the other. On the pragmatic side, there are deep national interests that both UAE and Israel can support by working openly together. On the idealistic side, is the notion that the example of the UAE and Israel will inspire other nations to join their friendship and help bring peace and stability to the region. Abdulla (2012) states plainly that Israel may be hesitant to pursue peace with Palestine. For instance, Israels new fragile coalition government favors building new settlements on Palestinian land. The majority in Israel oppose the two-state solution. More than 80% are adamantly against the Palestinians having an independent state of their own. Israel is yet to accept the very generous 2002 Arab Peace Initiative adopted by 22 Arab states at the Beirut Summit (Abdulla, 2021). Thus, there is something to be said for the criticisms that the idealistic nature of the Accords will not produce great fruits in terms of peace and stability. Yet, such a criticism is to miss out on the power of pragmatic ideas to produce good fruits on their own. When other states and communities see how prosperous for the UAE the friendship with Israel has become, they may be more willing to see what the UAE has seen for years: that collaboration is better for stability and enduring prosperity than a commitment to war and aggression. Whether petty grievances can be overcome is another matter. The UAE and Israel both remain hostile to Iran and its desire to obtain nuclear power. Palestinians still seek an independent state for themselves. Hezbollah still sees Israel as the greatest threat to peace. These conflicts are unlikely to be resolved soonbut by setting the pragmatic wheel in motion, there is at least some chance that new ground will be made towards peace and stability in the Middle East.

More Arab States Normalizing with Israel

The UAE is not alone in this...…Arabia, the reality of the new alliances will outweigh the objections of the other states: they will have no choice but to accept the new regional stability that has been adopted, even if it clashes with their own worldviews and natinalistic desires. Stability can be obtained even thenbut objecting states will have to accept and pursue a policy of tolerance and moderation. Such a policy can serve them in the long run, for they will also be able to reap the benefits of collaboration and peaceful cooperation. A win-win situation should not be denied any state willing to cooperate in the overall development of a more stable Middle East.

Former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has stated that he expects other Arab States to face up to the reality of the situation as well. The Middle East needs a stronger framework to ensure peace and stability. The Arab Peace Initiative has not proven workable. Pompeo believes the Gulf States will eventually recognize Israels right to exist: Theyll do it because its the right thing to do for their nation, because of increased prosperity and security for their country (Arab News, 2020). At the end of the day, the only impediment to peace is that some states hold onto a view that is antagonistic in nature. As Pompeo suggests, the path forward to stability runs through Israel. The extent to which Arab states want to collaborate with Israel and the extent to which Israel is willing to collaborate with other states will determine the outcome.

Conclusion

The UAE has chosen to formalize ties with Israel for the sake of social, economic, and political stability. It has recognized that it is better to make peace with Israel than to remain rooted to an antagonistic position that will do nothing to effect regional stability. The Palestinian problem is not going to be solved overnight, but through a policy of tolerance and moderation the foundation for solution may be put in place. Collaboration among the states will help bring about a stable future for all. The UAE is already seeing the economic benefits of collaboration with Israel: tourism, exports, GDP, and investments are all set to increase. Other states, such as Bahrain, see the benefits of this kind of friendship. Even Saudi Arabias Crown Prince recognizes that now is the time to change course. Problems persist as antagonism between Iran and other states presents an issue that will have to be addressed at some point. But in the meantime, regional stability can be obtained to some degree through a spirit of open collaboration. It is not a case of waving a magic wand…