Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
The foundations of high stakes testing indicate that their intention is to formulate change that is traceable and transparent. Accountability is essential to outcomes but instruction must be aligned to the needs of students and educators and most importantly must be inclusive of the perceptions and perceived needs of real life classroom teachers. Tracing the effectiveness of high stakes reforms and reforms that would be considered the fall out of such is essential to the development of alignment between curriculum and test results. (Bolt 2003) These changes cannot under any circumstances be judged solely on the perceptions of administers, as has been shown by this work administrators give a great deal more positive assessment of reform, prior to the acceptance of such reform as positive by real world classroom teachers. This is especially true with regard to those students who are clearly already at a disadvantage in the system, a finding that supports McNeil (2000) in the fact that high stakes testing reform has a tendency to aide only advanced and "normal" students while it may leave remedial students lagging.
No matter the outcome of testing, or the reform that achieves such outcomes the most important voices associated with it will; remain real classroom teachers who have the capacity to see, implement, learn from and hopefully develop creative systems to aide students not only in their ability to effectively take tests but to effectively learn basic and abstract concepts in mathematics instruction. This voice is essential in eliciting real change and cannot be ignored in any sense.
It is clear that both good and bad outcomes have ensued as a result of the accountability movement in mathematics reform. Teachers and others have increased the amount of continuing education and most importantly have sought alternative (performance based) assessment tools to balance the challenges of "teaching to the test" and to come to a greater understanding of how to implement and assess changes most effectively. Sadly, as with many reforms those who are already challenged stand to see the least improvement in both test scores and basic understanding of material as perceptions of these 134 educators indicate that only above average and average students are benefiting from high stakes math reform, while marginal students are not showing a great deal of improvement, if any.
Mathematics proficiency has often been seen as the litmus test for the effectiveness of any educational system, with and without reforms implementation. Student proficiency in math is essential to the development of students who can succeed in many other applications, both real world and academic, even when such success is seen as only marginally necessary by such students. Teacher perception, student perception, real proficiency and real test scores are all essential aspects of judging the effectiveness of any mathematics instruction. The influence of high stakes testing on awareness of progress is an unexpected positive outcome of the high stakes reforms, while fear of leaving behind already challenged students is the most negative outcome of reforms Either way, without the perceptions of real teachers in the classroom on a daily basis such understandings about the need for reversals or even further changes is impossible.
Though change is an essential aspect of the human condition, and change often elicits positive outcomes all change is not wholly positive. Teacher perception is such an essential aspect of mathematics or any educational reform that the need to assess it and then respond to it is crucial to a greater understanding of real classroom experiences. Through the accountability movement mathematics has clearly one through a transformation, and as this assessment demonstrates teachers are withholding judgment regarding its effectiveness and its measurements. Some very positive aspects of resistance and acceptance have been attained as teachers and their support systems implement greater creativity than was initially expected by achieving more continuing education and creating alternative assessments that can elicit greater breadth of understanding of real student achievement of knowledge attainment.
The importance of teacher buy in of reforms is essential but teachers clearly have right and reason to withhold judgment regarding reform until they know for sure that the changes implemented will really result in improvement of student outcomes and better essential knowledge of mathematics. Though this assessment is clearly topical, continued long-term assessment of teacher perception is essential to understanding how such changes will effect classroom applications and student achievement, especially once the teacher learning curve regarding the implications and applications of reform have been reached through further instruction and utilization of reform principles.
Another informative aspect of reform and a clear guide for future research will be real test scores, beyond marginal improvements. To accept reform as positive teachers and other educators must be shown more than marginal improvements on test scores, and they must also see real improvement for remedial as well as advanced and "normal" students. Student participation in creative solutions can and likely will play a part in these improvements, regardless of early concerns regarding issues of teachers "teaching to the test." Real world mathematics applications, performance based assessment for daily, weekly and quarterly personal improvement needs as well as many other teacher-based creative reforms will likely continue to play a significant role in change.
Teachers' overall desire to implement change in a balanced way will likely ensure that the most effective changes will occur in a breadth of classroom context that will be needed to ascertain real working standards of high stakes testing reform. Further research should continue to test and challenge the fear-based preconceived notions of high stakes testing as fundamentally destructive to real progress, through the continued assessment of teacher creativity in mathematic instruction and assessment in the real world classroom. When such changes being to be noted as unbalanced, alterations in standards must ensue to curb any real regression that might occur when teachers are asked to restrict teaching to exam standards and materials, teachers must clearly continue to have the authority to make these changes, in the classroom if they are to remain unwritten in most reform measures. Teacher involvement in policy change planning must also be assessed, frequently, as concerns regarding teacher empowerment could ultimately broaden the gap between quality and quantity teaching in the system.
Parent involvement in instruction and classroom success must also be reiterated continually, during and after change implementation. Parents, just like teachers and students must be sold on the ideal of reform-based standards so they can ultimately assist students in achieving greater exam outcomes as well as real classroom outcomes. Continued assessment of parent involvement and improvement of such is essential to reform success.
Last but certainly not least student perception of assessment reform and instructional reform is also essential to success of assessment reform applications. Students must understand the stakes of assessments both for themselves and for their schools and districts and must give the assessments the proper credence…[continue]
"Mathematics Curriculum Education One Aspect" (2008, August 27) Retrieved October 26, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/mathematics-curriculum-education-one-aspect-28366
"Mathematics Curriculum Education One Aspect" 27 August 2008. Web.26 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/mathematics-curriculum-education-one-aspect-28366>
"Mathematics Curriculum Education One Aspect", 27 August 2008, Accessed.26 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/mathematics-curriculum-education-one-aspect-28366
Students should be able to reflect on the process of problem solving. Reasoning and Proof Students should recognize that proofs are a fundamental aspect of mathematics. Within that understanding, they should develop the ability to select and use various types of mathematical reasoning. Communication The standard calls for students to communicate their mathematical thinking in a coherent and clear way to teachers, peers, and others. Students should be able to express their ideas
Mathematics Textbooks Technology used in Mathematics Textbooks Mathematics probably frustrates more students than any other subject in their course load. It seems that a logical, left brain is something that must be inborn and many students are not gifted with that natural ability. This means that there need to be some simple methods by which every student can be made to understand mathematical concepts. While many different teaching methods have been attempted
The district must then serve as the interpreter of specific and global need for the district, based on its particular composition and the state where needed. (Koppang, 2004, p. 154) Choose two of the eleven major functions as described in the Power point presentation and describe how these functions are instantiated in the Tempe document. Give examples to illustrate the ways that each function can be implemented. (I do not
Mathematics Teaching Learners Studying Basic Mathematics To Enable Helping Their Children With Their Education The work of Jackson and Ginsburg (2008) reports on a series of algebra classes involving a group of African-American mother and elementary-aged children, who are low income and who "had limited and negative formal experiences with algebra." (p. 10) The women in the study who arrived to the algebra classes are reported to have had "well-informed view of
SIAM's mission is to build cooperation between mathematics and the worlds of science and technology through its publications, research, and community. Over the last 50 years SIAM's goals have remained constant: • They want to advance the application of mathematics and computational science to engineering, industry, science, and society. • To was to promote research that will lead to effective new mathematical and computational methods and techniques for science, engineering, industry,
While the curriculum may be changing, it should not forget that developing insight into concepts, not just learning facts is important. According to Amy McAninch (2010) of Early Childhood Research and Practice, curriculums must reflect the principles of educational theorist Thomas Dewey and teach students how to learn. For example, when teaching geography, instead of learning facts about China and Australia, students should learn about what categories make up
Tested curriculum is that which is taught in order to be assessed. One example of tested curriculum would be in spelling, where a child is given a list of spellings to take home and learn in preparation to be tested at some later stage. There is no other motive behind the curriculum other than for the child to learn the information presented (Cuban, 1995). The hidden curriculum relates to the aspects