Kennedys And Kings By Harris Wofford This Book Review

¶ … Kennedys and Kings by Harris Wofford This is a book review of "Of Kennedy's and Kings" by Harris Wofford. It uses the book as a source.

This is a book that describes and tries to explain one of the most important and controversial periods in our political history. The author, Harris Wofford, has the advantage however of providing the reader with valuable insight on what was the atmosphere and ground reality in the 1960's from the point-of-view of an individual who was actually part of the political scene. He was a colleague of Dr. Martin Luther King during the civil rights movement, co-organizer of the Peace Corps, U.S. senator and now co-chair of America's Promise: Alliance for Youth. He worked closely with some of our nation's most beloved figures, Martin Luther King Jr. And President Kennedy. This book traces the events of history and embellishes them with his own personal memories, thus bringing alive to us what are well-known and extensively debated facts and ideas.

The book begins with an introduction to the environment and feel of the political scene in the early 60's. It describes the various tensions at play amongst the Negro community, the Democrats and Republicans, and the competition to obtain and retain the votes of the public by the main presidential candidates. A fine balance needed to be maintained and much depended upon Kennedy's ability to woo the Black voter without offending the White community. He and his camp were treading a fine line and Harris Wofford, being the civil rights advisor for JFK, was more aware of the complexities and fragility of the situation than most.

It is implied that it was Kennedy's call to Corretta King to sympathize with her husband's incarceration...

...

Many explanations and opinions on the strategy and intentions behind this action have been put forward over the years but according to Wofford it was an incident that was not as actively planned as previously projected. It happened amidst JFK's camp's attempt to uphold their liberal and pro-civil rights sentiments while not losing the Southern vote. That the outcome was in their favor was a happy but not pre-planned occurrence.
Through his personal glimpses the author conveys a sense of the era and the political condition. The Civil Rights movement was in full action, with Martin Luther King and his father commanding a massive following of Black and White people. With an emerging media apparatus and spreading social spirit every action and quote was analyzed and debated, and communicated all over the country. The presidential campaign was the focus of interest for all sectors of society and the charisma of the new young Democrat was a major reason.

The book describes how Kennedy and his mandate conveyed a sense of a futuristic outlook. The young senator was promising change, improved foreign policy, a war on poverty, and if not always explicitly seemed to imply that he believed in equal rights. He was surrounded by a younger group of people including the author, his brother and many other talented charismatic men and women who shared his vision for the country.

The author aside from being a politician and academician has always been an enthusiastic advocate of civil service. Much of the book conveys the concept and important stages in the Civil Rights movement. Describing the famous Montgomery Bus Boycott (1955) and King's reaction to encourage the participation of students and the common people in passive protests is revealing. The era comes alive under the authors pen with descriptions of sit-ins, protests, civil disobedience and the emotion evoked by such harnessing of power and will. The people were slowly uniting to overthrow…

Sources Used in Documents:

Movements such as the Peace Corps were organized with Wofford, Shriver and others at the helm. Kennedy was spreading and encouraging the youth to help him in bringing alive his vision and their own ideals, just like King. Reforms were put in place so that National Service became a reality and poverty, social services, segregation, labor laws could be modified and improved. The 1960's was a time of great upheaval and dismissal of many long held traditions in favor of viewpoints more in keeping with a modern and progressive world society.

The leaders of the nation were trying to initiate social change in which the foundations of a just community were laid in educational and economic institutions. They were aware of the struggles that would remain after the right to vote was instigated and that many other issues such as poverty were factors driving civil unrest. Wofford describes how three great leaders were lost within a short time, King, JFK and Robert Kennedy. Wofford comments on causes and the consequences of these tragic losses but the outcome remains that these deaths are still surrounded in conspiracy theories. The author emphasizes however, the meaning of such monumental losses to the American spirit and leadership, and how it was followed by further depression due to events such as the Vietnam War, an escalation of the cold war, and a shift from civil and social issues such as poverty and equality to war and defense.

This book has portrayed this much talked about era, its events, and personalities with an outlook that is more real and human then the glamour and intrigue that usually surrounds the. Wofford has described his own and the views of his generation and evoked a sense of the truly great trials and fears they faced head on, and one might say the fearlessness of youth and hope. The politics of the time also takes concrete shape in the imagination with a true sense of the players involved and forces moving them. The reader sees aspects of leaders and events that portray them as neither heroes nor villains but as people trying to do their best in difficult times.


Cite this Document:

"Kennedys And Kings By Harris Wofford This" (2003, September 23) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/kennedys-and-kings-by-harris-wofford-this-154025

"Kennedys And Kings By Harris Wofford This" 23 September 2003. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/kennedys-and-kings-by-harris-wofford-this-154025>

"Kennedys And Kings By Harris Wofford This", 23 September 2003, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/kennedys-and-kings-by-harris-wofford-this-154025

Related Documents
Civil Disobedience
PAGES 3 WORDS 870

Civil Disobedience Thoreau's Disobedience Thoreau's essay on civil disobedience not only gives a startlingly strong argument against paying one's taxes (which is in itself a difficult task), it also gives a subtle but clear image of Thoreau himself. In this essay, the reader discovers a writer who is at once romantic and cynical, idealistically self-sacrificing and fiercely self-centered, areligious and mystical. It would be tempting to portray Thoreau as inconsistent or somehow

Civil Disobedience The Trial of Socrates The Athenians suffered a crushing defeat in 404 B.C.E. with the end of the Peloponnesian War. A Spartan occupation force controlled the city, and instituted the rule of the Thirty Tyrants to replace Athenian democracy. While a form of democracy was reinstated it lacked the acceptance of ideas and freedom of speech that had been such an integral part of Athenian society (Rogers). In Athens at this

John Locke's social theory not only permits disobedience but also a revolution if the State violates its side of the contract. Martin Luther King, Jr. says that civil disobedience derives from the natural law tradition in that an unjust law is not a law but a perversion of it. He, therefore, sees consenting to obey laws as not extending or including unjust laws. At present, a new and different form

Civil Disobedience: Thoreau's research on civil disobedience puts it as the refusal by the citizens to obey laws or even pay taxes in a country. The end result of the disobedience is normally war, especially when the citizens want to take laws into their hands. The decision by citizens to take the law into their hands forces the government to act forcefully, which results in the war. However, when proper procedures

Regardless, to condemn Brown to death in Thoreau's view demoted the far greater human destruction of life via the institution of enslavement Brown attempted to end. This does not seem so much to be a contradiction or a defense of violence but a tempering of the anger that Brown created in the hearts of many Americans, and an attempt to put the violent acts of Brown in the context

Pharisaical practices are as popular today as they may be supposed to have been in the time of Christ -- and one of the biggest hypocrisies of our time is what Roosevelt called "the great arsenal of democracy," the shield-phrase with which the U.S. would pursue its policy of "manifest destiny" all over the globe (and an ideology it had been pursuing since the end of the 19th century when