Stanley Kubrick's Fell Metal Jacket Not Fit For Family Entertainment Term Paper

Length: 4 pages Sources: 3 Subject: Military Type: Term Paper Paper: #82294829 Related Topics: A Clockwork Orange, Marine Corps, Pixar, Family Planning
Excerpt from Term Paper :

¶ … Full Metal Jacket directed by Stanley Kubrick. Specifically it will discuss why the film is not fit for family entertainment. Stanley Kubrick is known for his violent and controversial films, from "Clockwork Orange" to this particular film. The film tells the story of Marine Corps recruits, first in basic training and then in combat in Vietnam, and it is definitely not a film for the entire family. It is extremely violent and it paints a picture of madness and military service that is certainly not appropriate for children. It may not even be appropriate for adults.

"Full Metal Jacket" is the epitome of a war film. It looks at the extreme violence of war and attempts to bring it to the viewer in a realistic way. It serves that purpose very well, because it does bring home the violence of war and how the country's military trains our young people to fight. Kubrick is known as a director who employs violence and controversy in his films and this film is no exception. It is extremely violent, and certainly not appropriate for children. It is not just the violence that makes this film unacceptable for the entire family. It is the plot lines too, that contain madness, killing out of madness and pure hate, and the portrayal of people in the military that are extremely cruel and vengeful. While the military should be portrayed realistically, and it seems the Marine Corps is the most extreme example of training in the military, children should not view this film. It may color their view of the military, but more than that it is simply too violent for children to watch. I had bad dreams after watching this film; I would hate to think how it would affect the mind of a child.

My first criterion that this is not a family film is the opening of the film in basic training. From the first shot, the Senior Drill Instructor harangued and belittles the new recruits. He is trying to turn them into fighting men, but the tactics are cruel and made me uneasy from the start. He plays on a person's weaknesses to break them down, and that is simply not something children should see. For example, Janet Moore argues that Full Metal Jacket explores boot camp training, the group mentality, and the ideal of hypermasculinity demanded by the army in order to critique them" (Gates 306). First, this behavior is violent and negative, but children might perceive that behavior is acceptable in "real life," and children can be cruel enough already, they do not need to see this behavior glamorized on the screen. They can see it on the playground every day from bullies in their classes, and that behavior does not need to be supported on the screen, especially for younger children, although the film is not appropriate for older children, either.

My second criterion that the film is simply not appropriate for younger viewers is the extreme use of violence in the film. Of course, war is a violent topic, and ultimately, this is an antiwar...


However, children might not understand the nuances of the film, and the extreme violence would not help them understand this is really a film that does not support war. They might see the violence as exciting and even stimulating, while not understanding the underlying message of the film. Kubrick did not intend this film to be viewed by children -- it was rated R. At the time, which means children under sixteen have to be accompanied by a parent. The violence, such as the shooting of the female sniper at the end, the shooting of the DI, the suicide, and the fanatical murder of Vietnamese women and children is not appropriate for children, and it is hard for many adults to watch. It is extreme violence, and it may be war, but not everyone has to experience the effects of war to understand the horror of war.

Another criterion that is important to mention is that this film uses "gallows humor" or black humor to get its point across, and most children simply would not understand that humor or how it occurs in the film. Children are often more literal in their translations of what they see, and they would not understand the subtleness of this humor, or the implication that these over the top violent scenes were actually a parody of the war itself, so the meaning would be lost on them. For example, the scene when the commanding officer talks about the Tet Offensive, and the character asks, "So I guess this means Ann Margaret won't be coming," would be lost on most children. They would not get the irony or humor in the situation, and they probably would not even know who she was. Therefore, the humor and satire of the film would be lost on most all children.

Finally, my last criterion that this is not a family film is the way the film depicts the military in general. Another critic notes, "Kubrick's Marine Corps, these critics argue, dehumanizes its men and reshapes them into desensitized killing machines who lack a strong individual identity once they go through basic training" (Perel 223). The DI is a bully and a cruel bully at that, and some of the officers appear like dolts or at least incompetent. For example, Lieutenant Lockhart does not believe Joker when he tells him he thinks there is a buildup of troops in Hue that will turn into the Tet Offensive, and commanders are killed in such rapid succession that no one really knows what is going on or what to do. It paints a very negative picture of the military, and children will not understand or appreciate that this is dramatic license through the director and the screenplay (which Kubrick also co-authored). Therefore, the nuances of the film are again lost on children, and they might only see it as a diatribe against the military, rather than an attempt to show the negative effects of war on the men who fight it.

War is hell, and there are many people who believe children should know and understand that, especially at an early age. It might convince them that violence and depravity are bad, and that war is bad and that might lead to a more peaceful world someday. That is why all children should view this film, according to the views of many. It could convince them that violence and war are to be avoided at all costs. It may be shocking, but children have to understand the world can be a very violent and frightening place, and they should be able to view what appears to be senseless violence, understand it, and ask questions about it. Children do not learn by sweeping certain situations under the rug. They learn by example, but they also learn by looking at their emotions and feelings, and questioning them, as well. It does not matter that the nuances of this film might be lost on many children. That is not the point. The point is to bring up the subject of war and have them explore their own feelings and emotions about what they have seen. Were they frightened? Were they disgusted? Were they shocked? Were they a little excited? It is important to validate these feelings and talk about them, rather than hiding them and never acknowledging them. Children cannot grow up in a glass bubble where they are sheltered from what really goes on in the world. They have to be able to face reality, and they have to know that things that are unspeakable do happen in the world.…

Sources Used in Documents:


Full Metal Jacket. Dir. Stanley Kubrick. Perf. Matthew Modine, Vincent D'Onofrio, R. Lee Ermey. Warner Brothers, 1987.

Gates, Philippa. "Fighting the Good Fight:' The Real and the Moral in the Contemporary Hollywood Combat Film." Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 22, 2005. 297 -- 310.

Gruben, Patricia. "The Invention of a Protagonist in Full Metal Jacket." 270-279.

Perel, Ziveh. "Individuality and Group Identity in Stanley Kubrick's Marine Corp." 223-232.

Cite this Document:

"Stanley Kubrick's Fell Metal Jacket Not Fit For Family Entertainment" (2009, October 28) Retrieved June 28, 2022, from

"Stanley Kubrick's Fell Metal Jacket Not Fit For Family Entertainment" 28 October 2009. Web.28 June. 2022. <>

"Stanley Kubrick's Fell Metal Jacket Not Fit For Family Entertainment", 28 October 2009, Accessed.28 June. 2022,

Related Documents
Entertainment Industry Report A: Entertainment Industry Structure
Words: 939 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Careers Paper #: 95538639

Entertainment Industry Report a: Entertainment Industry Structure and Relationships. The entertainment industry in general is a complicated and often violent beast. It crushes most of the hopes and dreams it cultivates. For the handful of successful industry employees today, thousands, or even millions, have shattered dreams. At the same time, the structure of the industry is such that often even those with some success do not always achieve this long-term. This is

Entertainment Economy
Words: 1345 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Recreation Paper #: 72384835

Entertainment Economy Michael J. Wolf's book, The Entertainment Economy: How Mega-Media Forces are Transforming Our Lives, was published six years ago but nevertheless offers timely insights into how the forces of American corporate entertainment are shaping our culture. Main Points The author points to the end of huge military spending at the conclusion of the Cold War, but those military-related industries were replaced by entertainment revenue for those cities. The author also mentions

Entertainment Law Is a Diverse
Words: 3913 Length: 15 Pages Topic: Music Paper #: 19141162

While royalties are discounted, an earning party may qualify for increases as well. Substantial record sales provides artists with an increase in the royalty rate based on specific plateaus of record sales, such as Recording Industry Association of America (R.I.A.A.) certification for gold and/or platinum sales. Even if a contract does not spell out for these increases, it may be possible to renegotiate if the sales are significant. Negotiating a

Entertainment Violence
Words: 387 Length: 1 Pages Topic: Recreation Paper #: 70243127

Entertainment Violence In recent years, politicians and citizen groups have criticized the entertainment industry for its violent content, claiming that it is responsible for violence in society. However, many claim that this consensus is overblown and unfounded by substantial research. There is considerable sociological and statistical data that suggests that violence begets violence and the root factor in the United States has been war, a continuous experience in one zone or another

Entertainment Expenses Tax Research Memorandum Jennifer Woods
Words: 444 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Transportation Paper #: 19465033

Entertainment Expenses Tax Research Memorandum Jennifer Woods From: Tax Accountant, CPA Entertainment Expenses Facts You are employed by Ski USA, a distributor of ski equipment and boots. You have been a bicycle racer for two years, in which you have participated in about 50 races annually, winning some so there is revenue, and incurring expenses, some being paid by sponsors. The National Bike Racing Association has ranked you in two events, the dual slalom and downhill

Entertainment Poll in a Recent Poll Teens
Words: 799 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Black Studies Paper #: 14260808

Entertainment Poll In a recent poll teens between the ages of 12 to 17 who were polled. In the poll 69% said that they believed it was legal to copy a CD from a friend who had purchased the original. Only 21% said that it was legal to copy such a CD if the friend got the music for free. 58% felt it was legal to copy the friend's purchased videotape