Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
Often companies find that when they first install filtering software or routers, the sites and communications employees need to do their jobs cannot be done. What is needed then is a gradual move to include those sites and types of communications with outside suppliers, buyers, customers, resellers, services organizations and other key constituents. The use of monitoring however is prevalent, according to the American Management Associated; fully 76% of companies from their 2005 survey on this subject actively monitor the use of websites and filter them based on content (American Management Association 2005). The momentum in businesses t measure, monitor and modify their Acceptable Use Policies is now in full-swing, and the development of these policies must be governed by the broader strategic needs of the company on the one hand and the need to ensure an acceptable environment for employees to work in on the other (Pauli, 2001).
The research objective of this study is to measure the level of awareness of e-mail monitoring programs in a typical company which is part of the services sector. Employee's levels of awareness of e-mail monitoring policies, their impressions and attitudes towards them, and the resulting influence on their behavior and productivity is the intent of this study. The research objective, hypothesis, variables included in the analysis and the methodology are provided in this section as well. Appendix a includes the questionnaire used in this analysis. Limitations of the study and threats to validity are also discussed.
To statistically prove that e-mail monitoring educational programs are not understood and effectively communicated in companies.
To validate significant differences between the perceptions of e-mail monitoring programs between genders.
Null Hypothesis: There is no significant statistical difference of employees with regard to their knowledge of e-mail policy specifics.
Alterative Hypothesis: There is a significant statistical difference of employees knowing the specific of the e-mail policies in their companies.
Methodology and Research Design total of thirty respondents were interviewed in person suing the questionnaire shown in Appendix a of this study. Gender, percentage of time spent checking e-mail, if the organization had terminated anyone for using e-mail outside the policies, and if the organization and informed them via written policies and regulations regarding violation of e-mail usage as well. Attitudes with regard to the right to privacy, legality of monitoring e-mail, attitudinal measurement of e-mail being monitored, and whether the respondent felt any sense of distrust of the organization as a result. All of these factors combined to create a complete empirical analysis of the effectiveness of training programs in teaching employees about e-mail usage policies.
Limitations and Threats to Validity
As with any empirical studies there must be safeguards against interviewer and respondent bias, in addition to guarding against respondent bias. To ensure these threats to validity are minimized, the interviewers defined their role as being from a local university, where the results would be aggregated to ensure their anonymity. In addition the researchers defined their role in the university as being completely separate from the company, and that the results of the survey would only be included in a summarized report. Given the approach of statistical analysis used in Microsoft Excel and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, it would be impossible to isolate each specific response by respondent, further ensuring their confidentiality as well.
As was stated in the Method section, the Hypothesis for this study is as follows:
Null Hypothesis: There is no significant statistical difference of employees with regard to their knowledge of e-mail policy specifics and their attitudes about e-mail monitoring.
Alterative Hypothesis: There is a significant statistical difference of employees knowing the specific of the e-mail policies in their attitudes about e-mail monitoring.
The statistical analysis techniques used for completing this research study include frequency distributions of each of the 13 variables in the analysis followed by a Bivariate Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of all variable sin the study using parametric and non-parametric correlational techniques. In addition cross-tabulations are used for further analysis of the data.
Bivariate ANOVA correlation analysis produced the correlation matrix in Appendix B of this document. Pearson Correlation Coefficients were derived to measure parametric strength of the variability in each factor included in the analysis. Both Spearman Rho and Kendall tau_b were included for non-parametric comparisons. The results show that there is a statistically significant correlation between respondents' perceptions of the ethicacy of using e-mail for personal or even illegal use and the incidence of training completed. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient (R2) between the variable "Does your organization inform you of the written policies and regulations regarding violation of e-mail usage?" And "Do you consider email monitoring illegal?" generates an R2 of.537, significant at the.01 level of confidence. The role of education programs has a statistically significant effect on the attitudes of employees when they consider their e-mails being monitored. Education of policies in this area appears to significantly lower resistance to change and therefore increase the incidence of adoption and adherence to them as well. Another finding underscores the effectiveness of education of policies in making employees aware of their rights to privacy. Comparing the variables "Do you know what your rights to privacy concerning e-mail monitoring are?" And "Does your organization inform you of the written policies and regulations regarding violation of e-mail usage?" yields a Pearson Correlation Coefficient of R2 of.431, significant at the.05 level of confidence.
Taken together, these two correlations highlight how critical it is for companies to work aggressively at educating their employees as to their rights relative to e-mail monitoring. As both of these correlations are significant at or above the.05 level of confidence, the Alternative Hypothesis is accepted, There is a significant statistical difference of employees knowing the specific of the e-mail policies in their attitudes about e-mail monitoring.
When all variables included in the analysis are however used in a linear regression analysis to see if combined they are treated as independent variables influencing the dependent variable, "Do you consider email monitoring illegal?" no statistically significant findings were found specifically defining the variation in this variable.
The greater the level of commitment on the part of companies to share the specifics of their e-mail and Internet use policies, the more accepting employees is of the need to monitor e-mails. Table 1 shown below is a cross-tabulation of the variables "Does your organization inform you of the written policies and regulations regarding violation of e-mail usage" by "Do you think the organization should have the right to monitor your e-mail because they own the system?." 30% of respondents specifically see the monitoring of e-mails as a right of the company. What is troubling however is the 14 respondents who are unsure of the policies regarding e-mail use. This signals a major shortcoming in teaching strategies.
Does your organization inform you of the written policies and regulations regarding violation of e-mail usage?
A yes no unsure Do you think the organization should have the right to monitor your e-mail because they own the system? yes Count 10 4-14-28% within Does your organization inform you of the written policies and regulations regarding violation of e-mail usage? 100.0% 66.7% 100.0% 93.3% unsure Count 0-2 0-2% within Does your organization inform you of the written policies and regulations regarding violation of e-mail usage?.0% 33.3%.0% 6.7% Total Count 10 6-14-30% within Does your organization inform you of the written policies and regulations regarding violation of e-mail usage? 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% it is evident from this analysis that there are major shortcomings in the effectiveness of training programs to educate employees on why e-mail use is monitored. In seeing such a high percentage of the sample, nearly 50% not aware of policies it is clear that teaching strategies are not as effective as they could be.
Delving into the survey data through the use of frequency distributions as shown in Appendix B of this study yields the following results. First, men tend to see monitoring as more of a risk to be taken in the name of doing their job, while women are more compliant in general and more attuned to stay well within the boundaries of policies. This is seen in the cross-tabulation of "Does the e-mail monitoring create a sense of distrust among the organization" by gender, showing over 50% of the entire sample, or 16 women, do not see this policy creating a sense of distrust.
Cross-tabulation: Does the e-mail monitoring create a sense of distrust among the organization? * Gender of respondent Crosstabulation
Gender of respondent
Does the e-mail monitoring create a sense of distrust among the organization?
What is remarkable is the variation in results of training programs. A total of 16 respondents, just over 50% of the sample have been trained on policies and appreciate why…[continue]
"E-Mail Monitoring Affects Employee Stress " (2008, December 11) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/e-mail-monitoring-affects-employee-stress-25909
"E-Mail Monitoring Affects Employee Stress " 11 December 2008. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/e-mail-monitoring-affects-employee-stress-25909>
"E-Mail Monitoring Affects Employee Stress ", 11 December 2008, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/e-mail-monitoring-affects-employee-stress-25909
The courts have basically given businesses cart blanc with regard to the monitoring of what their employees say and do in their work email as well as on their work computers, even when they sign in to private web-based email accounts for private transmissions, as such events can be recorded by employers, as the computer being used has been designated by the courts as the domain of the employer
Employee Handbook Privacy Section ABC Widget Company: Employee Handbook Privacy Section What privacy rights issues should be addressed? In the Age of Information, there are increasing concerns being voiced about what can legitimately be expected to be kept private, and how these issues affect employees' rights in the workplace. According to Hayden, Hendricks and Novak (1990, most adults spend approximately one-half of their waking hours in the workplace today, and it is therefore
Employee Privacy Torts History of Employee Privacy Changing Trends of Employee Privacy Impact of Innovative Technology on Employee Privacy Role of Social Media towards Employee Privacy Impact of Changing Community/Society on Employee Privacy Adaptation to the new Environment pertaining to Employee Privacy Employee Monitoring and Surveillance Laws and Employer Policies for Text Messaging and Social Media Electronic Communication Privacy Act Monitoring of Employee Conversations over Telephone & Email Recommendations for creating Effective Policies Future Implications of Employee Privacy As years have passed and
The first step in project management involves identifying the requirements. The second step is establishment of a clear and achievable objective. The third step is finding a balance for the competing demands for quality, scope, time and cost. Finally, the fourth step in project management is the adaptation of the specifications, plans and approach to the various concerns and expectations of the client. It is necessary that the manager
American today, works more that an American worker of even a generation ago. A 1999 Government report stated that workers worked 8% more hours than the previous generation. This translates to an average workweek of 47 hours. Twenty percent of workers today work more than 49 hours. The work place has been constantly changing -- the revolution from agronomies to industrialization having had its origins in the industrial revolution.
According to Reidenberg (2000: 1318), policy in the United States protects personal information according to a market-dominated paradigm, where limited statutory and common law rights are granted for information privacy. In Europe, on the other hand, the privacy protection norm is dominated by privacy rights. The European Union, for example, requires Member States to include comprehensive statutory protections for its citizens when it comes to privacy rights. The fact that
..three-fourths of employers monitor their employees' web site visits in order to prevent inappropriate surfing." (Employee Monitoring: Is There Privacy in the Workplace?) In my own experience I have found that technological innovations like email are an invaluable tool for communications and doing business. However I am also aware that in many ways privacy and individuality can be imposed on by these new technologies. There is also the continual and increasing