Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Hernando County and NCLB: Mandate for Drastic Change
The Hon. Ginny Brown-Waite
North Main Street
Hernando County's Current NCLB Situation
The Hernando County Situation in a Larger Context
National Commentary on NCLB
2004 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report -District Level, Hernando
1004 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report, Hernando
FCAT Grades and AYP Status, Hernando County Schools
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) act has stamped modern American education with the mark of mediocrity. In mandating that all school districts in the nation live up to a set of standards or lose important Title 1 funding for their disadvantaged schools, and by imposing sanctions that are draconian in their effects, the federal government is imposing the will of Congress on the choices of parents. In addition, the dissonant requirement that states set their own standards creates disparity of a magnitude unimaginable before the federal government decided to intrude into this most important, not to say intimate, local issue between children, parents and those who are entrusted to educate those children. The effect of the NCLB act is, so far, to encourage a lowering of standards -- a march toward educational mediocrity -- in the service of satisfying federal demands that are counterproductive at best, destructive of American education at worst. Title 1 funding may be important to many schools nationwide, and it is important to some Hernando County schools. But what is more important is the quality of education, not the calculation of test scores, particularly in light of the all-or-nothing character of assessment for NCLB passing or failing grades. Before the situation becomes desperate, a solution is offered here, based on some of the best educational writing locally and nationally, to opt out of a lose-lose situation before irreparable harm is done. In addition, Congress should be lobbied to repeal the act so that no district in the nation need suffer the intrusion, and the extreme sanctions, imposed by the NCLB.
Seven out of ten Hernando County elementary schools earned A ratings on Florida's 2004 school grades released in early June, 2004. At three of those schools, students also managed to make the required AYP, adequate yearly progress, according to the federal No Child Left Behind act (NCLB). (Bacon 2004) Of all the county's schools, 18 of 20 did not meet the standard, although just seven will face the consequences mandated by NCLB, mainly because " Congress imposed its rules only on those schools that receive significant federal funding, the Title I program for low-income campuses" (Solocheck 2004).
At the county's middle schools, the federally mandated 'ratings game' played out particularly badly. Only three out of all the county's middle schools met the AYP, although only one, Deltona Elementary, is a Title 1 school. In addition, five other county schools that receive Title 1 funding must allow their students to transfer to a better performing school because they failed to meet their AYP for a second year. (Bacon 2004)
That situation, without embellishment, is dire enough. Transporting children to schools farther from their homes is costly. Parents don't like it. It would also stand to reason that at least some of any gains the student experienced from attending the 'better' school might be lost in travel fatigue and stress caused by leaving familiar classmates, teachers and neighborhood. In short, the quality of life costs of this portion of NCLB stand to be substantial.
But worse still is that the county was hoisted on its own petard, or rather, a combination of its petard and that of Gov. Jeb Bush (leaving out entirely for the moment the governor's brother.) Because the NCLB allows states to set their own standards for achievements to be measured under NCLB, and Florida's is set relatively high (Governor Bush made that call), more of its students will fail to meet AYP than will the students in states that set very low standards for AYP. (Bacon 2004) Moreover, the state's own FCAT scores would lead observers to believe that the state's schools were, in fact, making progress toward better education. (Bacon, 2004)
In addition to the very cogent educational issues involved with NCLB, and the distressing life quality issues, there are also the funding issues. NCLB is a federal mandate without federal funding by and large; estimates put budget increases needed to cope with all the aspects of NCLB as high as 24% (Schrag 2004, 38+).
It is clear that Hernando County schools are in a distressing position regarding NCLB, and that some workable solutions must be found or the education of children in the county. This report proposes to find a workable solution by thoroughly researching the possibilities under NCLB and those external to it.
First, the report will present Hernando County statistics, and comments and concerns of Hernando County education officials and other concerned parties. Second, it will review the literature regarding both problems with and solutions to problems with NCLB. Third, it will make a recommendation for how Hernando County can best proceed to serve its student/parent population.
Hernando County's Current NCLB Situation
Hernando County experienced significant failures in terns of AYP in its middle schools, and officials were looking for explanations. One, the assistant principal at Fox Chapel Middle School, said a large amount of teacher turnover may have contributed to the lower grade. In addition, he noted that the population of the school had also changed. It had become a Title 1 school "with 50 percnet of our students on free or reduced lunch." (Bacon 2004)
Worse news was that even adding extra resource teachers, which might help, would be problematical, as the school has no room for them. But that could be a moot point if, in fact, a large number of students chose to transfer to better-performing schools, something NCLB gives them the right to do at any school that fails two years in a row. In fact, 60 students have already chosen to change schools next fall. (Bacon 2004) Under the NCLB at, "Title 1 schools must offer school choice if their subgroups -- whether poor, learning disabled, black, Hispanic or of limited English skills -- fail to make adequate yearly progress for two consecutive years" (Bacon 2004). The NCLB law states that priority in school choice be given to the lowest-achieving children from low-income families, "and that they be allowed to select from among schools not identified as needing improvement under No Child Left Behind" (Solocheck). NCLB also states that the school district must offer at least two choices for transfer (Solocheck 2004), but in a district with the vast majority of schools failing, such as this one, the problem for school administrators then becomes how to offer two choices that are not for equally 'non-performing' schools. Hernando did not "want to give choices that would have youngsters taking lengthy bus rides across the count" (Solocheck 2004), doubtless for both fiscal and family reasons.
Under the NCLB act, it is not enough for a school to meet its AYP in most areas; it must meet them in all or fail. This is the explanation for a district having an overall 90% rate of meeting AYP, and yet have specific schools fail and even risk loss of Title 1 funding. Following is a table of the grades of Hernando County Schools in 2003 and 3004, and a Yes or No for meeting their AYP in 2004:
FCAT Grades and AYP Status, Hernando County Schools
SCHOOL GRADE/2003 GRADE/2004 AYP
Brooksville AB No
Chocachatti AA Yes
Eastside AA No
Source: Hernando Today.com/Bacon 2004
In some respects, the results look a lot worse than they really are. Some schools failed to meet AYP because they had inadequate number of students tested in one or more of the nine subgroups. Some schools that ordinarily perform well failed to meet the NCLB standards simply because of the federal accountability formula that mandates that 95% of all students in each subgroup in each grade must be tested. For example, Hernando Elementary, which serves only kindergarten through second grade students, failed because only 94% of he special education students were tested in reading and language, and only 92% in mathematics, falling short of the mandated 95%. (Long 2004) Similarly, Oak Grove Central failed to meet the 2003 AYP because of similarly non-compliance in testing percentages in the same areas. In addition, tests were given in one instance "but some were not scored due to a procedural error" (Long 2004). "If even one group fails, the entire school fails" (Solocheck 2004)
AYP also measures improvement of students from one grade level to the next, such as from second to third grades. In the schools tested, none of the third grades have assistants because the Florida Department of Education had decided several years ago that kindergarten though second grade should have assistants; this required all the available funding. However, new school equity funding at…[continue]
"Education Report To Congress Person" (2004, June 19) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/education-report-to-congress-person-171585
"Education Report To Congress Person" 19 June 2004. Web.21 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/education-report-to-congress-person-171585>
"Education Report To Congress Person", 19 June 2004, Accessed.21 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/education-report-to-congress-person-171585
What works for one child is not necessarily going to work for the next. So how can one promote the use of standardized tests as the only way to measure educational learning and success? The premise of the No Child Left Behind Act is very honorable. Each child should be taught by the best teachers that there are and each school should be held accountable for making sure that
Congress did more than just reauthorize the Act, though. It also required that state agencies be established that would be able to handle some of the work that accrediting agencies were once expected to do on their own (Crow, 2009). By doing that, it was assumed accreditation would be easy to attain for deserving schools, and the value of being accredited would be seen once again (Crow, 2009). It became
This qualitative research uses a Delphi study to explore the perceptions of special education teachers regarding retention. This Delphi study includes twenty-five to thirty special education teachers of K-12 in two California districts of less than 40,000 students. The information gathered provides leaders in the field with successful practices in retaining special education teachers. Purpose of the study The primary purpose of this study is to explore the perceptions of special education
Thus, efforts aimed at helping teachers to avoid harmful stereotyping of students often begin with activities designed to raise teachers' awareness of their unconscious biases." (1989) Cotton goes on the relate that there are specific ways in which differential expectations are communicated to students according to the work of: "Brookover, et al. (1982); Brophy (1983); Brophy and Evertson (1976); Brophy and Good (1970); Cooper and Good (1983); Cooper and
gifted and talented education for minority students. The writer explores the screening process for gifted and talented programs and the various problems that screening process causes when it comes to locating and educating minority students. The writer also explores the societal mindsets and the urban areas that play a part in the overlooking of minority gifted students. The bulk of the exploration is done with a literature review on
Every year, several thousand actions are referred to committees. Only a small percentage is selected for consideration, and those not addressed often receive no further action. Committees determine the fate of most proposed laws. According to some experts the committee system is the natural form of division of labor in such a large and complex body as the Congress (Overview: The Committee System in the U.S. Congress, 2009). Presently there
In a community college in North Carolina (where there is a serious shortage of nurses) the entire nursing program is cut back to the point that there is a "waiting list just to get on the waiting list" (Rampell). When states run short of money they cut back on funds to community colleges, and when that happens it not only hurts students and their families, but it hurts communities. When