Effectiveness of ASEAN Term Paper

  • Length: 37 pages
  • Subject: Economics
  • Type: Term Paper
  • Paper: #84307607

Excerpt from Term Paper :


The study will be delving into: What ASEAN constitutes and what remains beyond its scope? The aim of this study will be handing out a wide-ranging presentation of the present stance of ASEAN and its accomplishments till date, along with its challenges. The paper is intended as a suggestion for a master-plan that can be employed as a future pathway where ASEAN political-security support must be going towards in the forthcoming years.

To start with let us have a brief introduction of the organization. The creators of the Association of South East Asian Nations - ASEAN, visualized it as ultimately assembling all the nations of the region and managing them to lend a hand in assuring the peace, permanence and growth of the area. While the area was in a state of turmoil, a lot of nations were under pressure for the existence of the nation or autonomy. First of all the five founding states had planned that ASEAN will be, in keeping with its abbreviation distinctly suggesting a unity of South East Asian countries working together willingly for the mutual betterment. The basic objective of the organization was tranquility, financial, societal and cultural progress, and the perception being: with tranquility in the area, stability will not be far behind that would result in the financial affluence of the population in the area. It was not destined to be a supranational identity, discharging its objectives discretionally of its member nations: It was not to have any regional parliament or authority to frame regulations; devoid of a judicial system and having no authority of executing powers.

ASEAN was established in 1967 in the midst of substantial volatility that existed in Southeast Asia at that time. Its formation was chiefly provoked by the requirement for settlement following Indonesia's period of conflict with Malaysia and Singapore, which had started in 1963 and came to an end when President Sukarno was expelled from authority in 1966. The general anticommunist feeling and a mutual anxiety over the influence of the Vietnam War on the U.S. assurance to local safety are the two factors that integrated the founding countries, namely, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. Because of intense battle in Indochina and communist factions vigorous in Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia, regional cooperation was envisaged as an essential means to build up member countries in opposition to communist rebellion. It was believed that improved regional cooperation would permit the distribution of resources to economic growth, which, consecutively, would play a role in political stability.

One might be interested to know as to the reason behind the founding members to restrict the capacity of its goals. It might not be out of place to perceive that ASEAN came into being while the political and financial situation in the South East Asian countries was thrown out of gear. It is really a creditable achievement that the organization was able to be formed in the heat of persisting bilateral intimidating problem. It is heartening and pertinent for us in the present day to believe that these several years following those initial periods of stress; there has not been any incident of clashes among ASEAN countries. The comparative tranquility and constancy till the 1990's had set apart a majority of the ASEAN nations has made achievable years of unparalleled profitability and development on the social front. It will be farfetched to say that the every apprehension has been settled. Whereas several problems among the participating nations still exist, and some amount of distrust remains, the power of ASEAN appear to be in the chance that every participating member wields in the feasibility of ASEAN. This transcends the present political and social interests, which every participating country forms as a result of the joint efforts of attaining tranquility on the edifice of which ASEAN stands.

Secondly, the immense multiplicity of the member strength - in stature, and stages of growth, in human and added resources, its past, traditions, religious faiths, linguistic backgrounds, ethnicity, principles and customs, financial and social organizations and also political systems crops up with centrifugal forces which occasionally give confrontations. Due to this, bodies under ASEAN and systems have been developing bit by bit and cautiously so as to foster its solidarity. News has been doing the rounds that they are approaching issues with utmost care. Truly, the situation of progression cannot be accelerated by force. The non-cohesive character of the Organization, perceived in the casual manners and intricacy of its procedure has occasionally directed the detractors to belittle the body as just a "chat store." Maybe we can state that chatting is definitely healthier than getting involved in clashes. Moreover, that chatting or discussion, just if we might make use of a further hip terminology, can contribute towards becoming sympathetic, concord and mutual assistance. These discussions have also contributed to further official discussions, like the establishment of the ASEAN Regional Forum wherein, coupled with ASEAN, every nation of South East Asia put their efforts to seek advice from and create joint self-assurance within themselves - an aspect crucial for regional tranquility and safety. These exchanges among the different divisions of community, particularly in the entire gamut of ASEAN are akin to interweaving a drapery, the more the strands of the fabric are woven, and the drapery gains in strength.

Thirdly, arriving at a decision in ASEAN is through unanimous agreement, and not through a voting process to ascertain majority. It is even in the framework of ASEAN's multiplicity as also traditional, linguistic and political causes that imposing a majority verdict on a minority might simply damage the structure of the organization. Thus ASEAN has inclined towards agreements and intended harmony based on benevolence and good conviction somewhat than entering the legal process of obligatory contracts. Proceeding a bit further, ASEAN affiliate nations had a common sagacity that every participating nation in the area shall be in the ASEAN fold, instead of wandering politically or financially, or even secluded. By means of expanding its member base, ASEAN expected to achieve more force, not just through the count of members, but even by building an interconnected group, which is the outcome of geographical proximity. At present, the ASEAN region comprises a major portion of the geographical area of the Asian continent. On the financial front, it is counted in the developing part of the globe; however several of the participating nations have being included along with the best competitive economies.

Achievements of ASEAN

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), in its three decades, has turned out to be a vital participant in Asian economic and political affairs. ASEAN has made possible both economic and security collaboration in the Pacific region through its development into a rational local organization. Consequently, it has come to take up a foremost place in the foreign policy of both the United States and Japan concerning Asia. Due to several years of substantial growth several of the member nations have attained high levels of prosperity which was not thought of at the time ASEAN was being formed. 'Growth' in the light of its meaning is a method through which the evils of the society are to be resolved by executing an organized and clear-cut procedure. A method of tackling with the concern and getting to the bottom of the troubles by means of growth is usually indicated as discharging - growth interference. The results of growth interference are characteristically calculated by the effects, which it generates in giving an answer to the crisis being tackled. This identical fundamental viewpoint is employed in the ASEAN collaboration relating to growth.

Regional efforts towards growth implemented under ASEAN collaboration are consistently meant as tackling local inconveniences and questions by way of growth interferences that are ideally executed at the regional stages. Since ASEAN symbolizes the benefits of its participating nations as a combine, growth interference executed in the region would obviously have to go well with the requirements of the ASEAN combine without doubling of functions which can be executed in an improved manner at the state or regional plane. Based on this background, a norm for regional entity has come to be accepted as extremely fruitful in examining in case a concept for regional growth interference is in fact local. Similar to several other growth projects, the ASEAN development collaboration is also carried out by means of collaborative programs.

A scheme or plan can be envisioned as an executing instrument to execute growth interferences to attain a collection of appropriately distinct objectives to achieve goals of the ASEAN regional growth. In tackling with the particular regional issues and ascribing to the growth intentions of the ASEAN proposals of activities, collaborative growth of schemes concepts are hoped to multiply in the two usual impetus of ASEAN scheme. In the background of the ASEAN collaboration and system, progressive collaborative schemes and plans are normally molded by the different ASEAN associations. The additional useful basis of scheme and plan proposals constitutes the ASEAN member nations…

Cite This Term Paper:

"Effectiveness Of ASEAN" (2004, October 31) Retrieved January 17, 2017, from

"Effectiveness Of ASEAN" 31 October 2004. Web.17 January. 2017. <

"Effectiveness Of ASEAN", 31 October 2004, Accessed.17 January. 2017,