Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
For example, he voted to require that schools utilize resources to support religions activities if they designate resources to non-religious activities (Board of Education. v. Mergens, 1990). Further, Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002) called for vouchers to be given to families of low socioeconomic standing for both religious and secular educational institutions. This being said, Rehnquist was not able to completely disrupt the social change that Warren had started in this area but he was able to utilize his conservative nature to take a few steps backward.
Where Warren set to emphasize the equal protection rights of the individual in the criminal justice system, Rehnquist focused on the importance of the conviction of the guilty and absolution of the innocent (Davis, 1992). Police practices were believed to be necessary and appropriate if they were able to secure the conviction of a guilty party. In fact Rehnquist attempted to overturn the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1996) and when unsuccessful was able to secure rulings that limited the scope of its impact. Rehnquist voted in favor of police action that secured confessions and resulted in punishment of a guilty person regardless of the means by which it was obtained. This included cases where a confession was secured even after a suspect asked for counsel or in which evidence was procured through a motor vehicle stop that did not appear to have probable cause (Davis, 1992). These rulings demonstrate Rehnquist's conservative viewpoint and his need to put social order above the needs or rights of the individual.
Unlike Warren who recognized that social change was upon us and in fact led this change through his controversial rulings that protected the civil liberties of the individual, Rehnquist consistently voted for decisions that emphasized public order maintenance. This approach gave some protection back to law enforcement and increased liberty in their ability to secure evidence and confessions that could later be used in court. Yet despite initial attempts to overturn and influence the Miranda warning, Rehnquist eventually sustained this decision in the ruling of Dickerson v. United States (2000). In this ruling, Rehnquist claims that separate from his own beliefs on Miranda that it had become embedded in routine police practices and national culture and therefore should be upheld in the high court.
Where Warren ruled for the civil rights of the individual in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), Rehnquist fundamentally supported the concept of separate but equal. This is further evidenced by his rulings on affirmative action. In 1995, the Supreme Court, led by Rehnquist ruled unconstitutional the preferential treatment on race in government run programs (Lacayo et al., 2003). This ruling had far reaching implications for educational institutions and impacted current affirmative action programs that existed in government. For example, in the ruling on Adarand Constructors Inc. v. Pena (1995), a Colorado organization challenged a federal program offering general contractors financial incentives to hire minorities. This ruling supported Rehnquist's belief that programs should not be tailored to allow for the favoring of racial groupings (Lacayo et al., 2003).
Rehnquist also took a hard stance on the death penalty once again favoring social order over individual civil liberties. Stemming from his previous positions on legal searches that permitted searches by police without identification of themselves and request for entry into a premises, Rehnquist also sought to limit the opportunities of prisoners to appeal their convictions. This position is again fundamentally different from that of Warren who believed in equal justice for all even if this justice ended up in the Supreme Court. Rehnquist utilized his viewpoint in his vote on capital punishment claiming that prisoners should not be able to postpone execution through the federal appeals process. This is particularly evident in the ruling on Teague v. Lane (1989) as well as continued legislation that made the appeals process unattainable in the federal court system.
Each of these Chief Justices has had considerable influence over the United States judicial system as well as the manner in which the constitution is interpreted. While the Supreme Court attempts to strike a balance between the support of the civil liberties of the individual and the maintenance of social order, the pendulum often swings in different directions on the issue as can be seen through the rulings and voting trends of these two Chief Justices. While Warren's tenure is viewed as an upsurge of activism that produced significant expansions to court protected civil rights and access to courts to secure these rights, Rehnquist's term is a conservative one that favored social order and the swift and authoritarian punishment of the guilty. It is very possible that the difference in perspectives by ruling Chief Justices assists in maintaining the balance as the pendulum swings from one direction to the other.
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995).
Board of Educucation. v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226 (1990).
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
Davis, S. (1992). Rehnquist and state courts: Federalism revisited, The Western Political Quarterly, 45(3), 773-782.
Fallon, R.H. (2002). The "conservative" paths of the Rehnquist court's federalism decisions. The University of Chicago Law Review, 69(2), 429-494.
Hammond, P.E. (2001). American church/state jurisprudence from the Warren court to the Rehnquist court. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(3), 455-464.
Klein, S.R. (2001). Miranda's exceptions in a post-Dickenson world. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 91(3), 567-596.
Lacayo, R., Novack, V., Bacon,, P. & Milch, A. (2003). How Rehnquist changed America. Time…[continue]
"Supreme Court Decisions The Nature" (2010, July 14) Retrieved October 24, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/supreme-court-decisions-the-nature-9717
"Supreme Court Decisions The Nature" 14 July 2010. Web.24 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/supreme-court-decisions-the-nature-9717>
"Supreme Court Decisions The Nature", 14 July 2010, Accessed.24 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/supreme-court-decisions-the-nature-9717
Components of this act that have been targeted towards advanced nursing practitioners include a lifting of the limits for how much money can be spent on doctoral programs for nurses (No author, 2011). Most advanced practice nurses have a master's degree; the removal of the cap for funding for doctoral programs will almost certainly allow these professionals to complete more doctoral degrees, increase their breadth of knowledge, and provide
Supreme Court's recent decision to ban the execution of mentally challenged individuals raises important ethical issues. Judges must be able to determine if a person is indeed mentally challenged. While the legal system and psychology have made important insights into this issue, there is still some inconsistency in the definition and application of mental retardation in the judicial system. Accordingly, an analysis of the ethical principles underlying the issue
Let such programs fund themselves through private charitable contributions. If they're justified they'll survive. Laws and policies should be reformed so they protect all the rights and due process for both men and women equally. In concluding, justice and fairness can only be attained and preserved where we rely on the judgment of people as jurors. When we subtly suggest that they defer to expertise in human behavior for a judgment
Supreme Court Chief Justices Warren and Rehnquist Compare and contrast approaches to criminal procedures by U.S. Supreme Courts: The Warren vs. The Rehnquist Court A common philosophical debate within the legal community is when the approach advocated by so-called 'conservative' justices (often called strict constructionism) is pitted against more 'liberal' and freer interpretations of constitutional words and history. Throughout much of the 20th century, it was often said that the more liberal
The true spirit and meaning of the amendments, as we said in the Slaughter-House Cases (16 Wall. 36), cannot be understood without keeping in view the history of the times when they were adopted, and the general objects they plainly sought to accomplish. At the time when they were incorporated into the Constitution, it required little knowledge of human nature to anticipate that those who had long been regarded
Decisions by School Superintendents Improper Attitude and Unprofessional Conduct of Teachers To educate a person in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society - President Theodore Roosevelt. That teaching is at one and the same time an intellectual as well as a moral endeavor, is an idea that is well entrenched in the minds of men since centuries past. The sayings of great teachers of ancient times bear
Tribe refers to what Ronald Dworkin says later in the book. Dworkin holds that everyone is an originalist now but that they are not seeking what the lawmakers expected but what they meant to say in their law, suggesting perhaps that they may not be writing laws as clearly as could be or that the vagaries of language often make it difficult to do so without some form of