Legaliztain Of Marijuana In 2009, Term Paper

PAGES
9
WORDS
2375
Cite

In the 1980's President Ronald Reagan continued the war by advocated his own war and it was estimated that due to these wars, someone was arrested on a violation of a marijuana law every 38 seconds. Thankfully, these wars have become more focused on the real drug problems that are primarily synthetic or man made or used in ways never imagined. But heroin and methamphitamines are clearly not health regimens. They kill people every day, cause real crimes and ruin families, lives and destroys entire groups.

The first step in changing the view of marijuana began with the legalization for medical usage. The compassions for the ill allowed California to pass the first medical marijuana law in the country in 1996 Milestones. It was followed by several states including Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon and Rhodie Island, Vermont and Washington have all passed a version of medical marijuana Milestones. Other states are consdietedlegalization marijuana and will be watching what happens in California.

The effects of marijuana use have been studied however, such studies have certain limitations and findings. Most are unanimous in that marijuana use is not addictive, not a gateway drug to harder drugs and has few negatives effects.

The positive effects appear to be primarily related to the THC in the marijuana and is used most among terminally ill patients Schaffer Drug Library. It is useful in treating pain, nausea, appetite loss caused by advanced cancer and AIDS and also acts as a sedative and reduces anxiety Schaffer. It is believed to have more therapeutic benefits perhaps with epilepsy and glaucoma. It also appears that in cases of patients with Multiple Sclerosis it gives suffers greater help than any drug Schaffer.

The negative impact appears to be short-term memory loss, reduction in sperm production and possibility an effect to prostrate cancer however these are not clear.

A good example of how people will be used to create fear is evident from the past. A retired trial Judge, Jim Gray, wrote a letter addressing some concerns since he supports the legalization of marijuana and is using his experience to make this statement Judge Jim Gray.

In the letter he said that to say it sends the wrong message to children is nor more true than saying the same thing about the message they receive about alcohol use or tobacco Gray. The accessibility and damages and danger regarding marijuana are already in place, if harm is to be had, so such

...

That children are solicited by drug dealers to make money and sell to their friends and the legalization of marijuana would end this terrible crime to children Gray. Drug dealers don't I.D. Their customers and anti-gang strategy to legalize marijuana would stop the use of children to be initiated in order to recruit and make money selling marijuana. It would reduce gang membership and stop gang initiations.
The fear portion of legalizing marijuana as the letter from the Judge states goes back to the entire propaganda machine starting in the 1930's. By convincing people of th e supposed dangers and problems of marijuana use the entire machine has caused the same problem to still exist in 2010. People will be approached through the media by the opponents of the legislation by calling on the fear mongering of the last 50 years. Crime will increase, violence will go on a rampage, our youth will become even more vulnerable and harder drugs will come on the scene if marijuana is legalized. If the proponent of the measure are given the funds and opportunity to get the proper message out, about the revenue and safety the laws the bill actually place upon everyone regarding how the whole legalization process will function, perhaps more people will view the proposal with an open mind. It is hoped that California would be the one state where such a revolution could occur.

Works Cited

"42.0 Milestones in the History of Marijuana." N.p., 9 May 2010. Web. .

Buchanan, Wyatt. "State's Voters to Decide on Legalizing Pot." San Fransisco Chronicle, n.d. Web. 9 May 2010. .

"Campaigns That Matter - Legalizing Marijuana in California." Campaigns That Matter - California Politics, California Political News, California Legislative News, Public Policy Information, California State Elections, California Political Campaigns, California Propositions. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 May 2010. .

Gray, Jim. Judgejimgray.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 May 2010. .

"Marijuana Control, Regulation and Education Act." Wikipedia. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 May 2010. .

Schaffer Drug Library. N.p., 9 May 2010. Web. .

Weber, Christopher. "Bill That Would Legalize Marijuana in California Passes Committee." N.p., n.d. Web. 9 May 2010.

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

"42.0 Milestones in the History of Marijuana." N.p., 9 May 2010. Web. <rainz.org/420- milestones-history-marijuana/>.

Buchanan, Wyatt. "State's Voters to Decide on Legalizing Pot." San Fransisco Chronicle, n.d. Web. 9 May 2010. .

"Campaigns That Matter - Legalizing Marijuana in California." Campaigns That Matter - California Politics, California Political News, California Legislative News, Public Policy Information, California State Elections, California Political Campaigns, California Propositions. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 May 2010. .

Gray, Jim. Judgejimgray.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 May 2010. .


Cite this Document:

"Legaliztain Of Marijuana In 2009 " (2010, May 12) Retrieved April 16, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/legaliztain-of-marijuana-in-2009-2986

"Legaliztain Of Marijuana In 2009 " 12 May 2010. Web.16 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/legaliztain-of-marijuana-in-2009-2986>

"Legaliztain Of Marijuana In 2009 ", 12 May 2010, Accessed.16 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/legaliztain-of-marijuana-in-2009-2986

Related Documents

Marijuana Medical Marijuana: The Interplay between State and Federal Law History of Criminalization The Current War on Drugs Political Issues The legal status of medical marijuana in the United States is something of a paradox. On one hand, federal government has placed a ban on the drug with no exceptions. On the other hand, over one-third of the states have that legalizes the cultivation, distribution, and consumption of the drug for medical purposes. As such, the

In Germany it is still an offence under the drug laws to posses the drug but the laws are some what more liberal. For example the prosecution may not press charges where the drug was found to be in 'low quantity 'and was for personal use. Thus patients have received lower penalties. The progress in Germany is such that in April 2000, the German company THC Pharm received the

Gilman asserts that the debate should not be about the medical value of marijuana, but how the drug should be delivered. The Genetic Science Learning Center outlines several delivery methods of medical marijuana. First of all is smoking. The benefits of this method include that it delivers all of the plant's active compounds, and that it is easy to regulate the dose. Disadvantages of this method are that there is

Medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/bin/procon/procon.cgi?database=5-B-Subs-1.db&command=viewone&op=t&id=1&rnd=414.848519162785)." March 1, 2007 Lester Grinspoon One of the more controversial uses of marijuana is the fact that it is believed to alleviate inflammation which opens the doors for arguments with regard to disorders including fibromyalgia which doctors still debate the existence of. However, as long as the patient is suffering and can match the set criteria for the disorder, who is society to argue that it does not exist and

Legislators and drug enforcers are not physicians and should not substitute their belief system for demonstrable scientific studies showing that medical marijuana does benefit patients. The federal argument often begins with a denial of this, as if any study that suggests there is no benefit is automatically preferred to the hundreds that show there is. The next claim made is that the harm is greater than the curative power, which

" By characterizing the use of illegal drugs as quasi-legal, state-sanctioned, Saturday afternoon fun, legalizers destabilize the societal norm that drug use is dangerous." Allowing medical use of marijuana sends the wrong message to children. Children entering drug abuse treatment have routinely reported that they heard that marijuana is medicine'and, therefore, believed it to be good for them. Those in favor of medical marijuana believe that studies such as the 1999 U.S.