Minimizing Wrongful Convictions Through An Efficient Innocence Program Essay

PAGES
15
WORDS
5016
Cite

Safeguarding the criminal justice system from wrongful convictions through an efficient innocence program policy evaluation proposal

Executive summary

Convicting innocent people is a global concern. The problem has been brought to the fore in the US through DNA tests that have proven the innocence of some of the people already serving jail terms. So far, up to 138 people have been exonerated of the crimes they were accused and convicted of. Of the number, 13 people were on death row. Experts observe that at least 23 people have already been executed after conviction, in the US, despite their innocence. There are persistent efforts that have led to significant progress with regard to detecting and preventing people from being wrongfully convicted. There is a lot of room for improvement in this area though. Apart from the reforms highlighted and discussed in this paper, the public is increasingly becoming aware of the problem. Such awareness has helped to identify cases with potentially innocent people on trial. It has energized the campaigns to institute reforms meant to reduce the miscarriage of justice. The case between O.J Simpson and the people is a good reminder of the issues that are rarely noticed in the process of trial. This paper tries to point out the aspects of the innocence plan that require tweaking, and how such improvement can be done, with the intention of protecting the justice system from handing out wrongful convictions.

This paper will apply the survey method to gauge the perception of officers regarding how effective body cameras are, in making officers relax in the cause of their police operations. Body cameras were introduced recently by the metropolitan police authorities so as to encourage police accountability in the cause of their work. The study will use the quantitative survey approach to establish how much the officers acknowledge the body cameras effectiveness in achieving the aims intended by the policy. The survey will constitute 5 to 10 questions to be answered based on a rating scale of 1 to 5. The officers responses will be collated and analyzed with the descriptive statistical analysis approach. The main intention of the study is that once the proposal has been successfully implemented, the results will demonstrate the effectiveness level of the body cameras as perceived by the police who use them.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction 3

1.1. Program review 3

1.2. Significance of the problem 5

1.3. Significance of the evaluation 5

1.4. Motivation of the study 6

1.5. Research question 6

2. Literature review 6

2.1. Introduction 6

2.2. Unfair conviction transformations in the U.S. 6

2.2.1. Legislation and Public Policy 7

2.2.2. The Death Penalty 7

2.3. OJ Simpsons case and its impact on criminal justice 8

3. Methodology 10

3.1. Research design 10

3.2. Study tool and analysis 10

3.3. Ethical issues 10

4. Expected results 10

5. Conclusion 11

6.

Cite this Document:

"Minimizing Wrongful Convictions Through An Efficient Innocence Program" (2018, February 13) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/minimizing-wrongful-convictions-efficient-innocence-program-essay-2177573

"Minimizing Wrongful Convictions Through An Efficient Innocence Program" 13 February 2018. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/minimizing-wrongful-convictions-efficient-innocence-program-essay-2177573>

"Minimizing Wrongful Convictions Through An Efficient Innocence Program", 13 February 2018, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/minimizing-wrongful-convictions-efficient-innocence-program-essay-2177573

Related Documents

Wrongful Conviction Review: Henry James Wrongful convictions are convictions where "factually innocent people are convicted of crimes" (Acker & Redlich, 2011, p.3). There are a number of ways that wrongful convictions can occur. Two of these ways are no crime convictions and wrong man convictions (Acker & Reclich, 2011, p.7-8). No crime convictions occur when someone is convicted of a crime, generally murder, and then it is later discovered that no

Wrongful Conviction of James Henry Henry James was only 19 years during his conviction for rape that he did not commit. It is after thirty years imprisonment that the realization of his innocence emerges thereby keeping it free. This case is a good example of the importance of evidence in the proceedings of a case. The imprisonment of the innocent man arose because of the little evidence that he had against

The over-enthusiasm associated with the extensive and unrestrained caution which the prosecutors avail gives birth to the settings in which a prosecutor is able to cause the conviction of an innocent individual. Besides, the mixture of over-enthusiasm and unimpeded discretion on one side and regular non-adversarialness on the other outcomes in an irregular playing field in majority of the defendants either guilty or innocent. (Griffin, 1274) The apparent cases of

Why would somebody confess to a crime they did not commit? According to professor Kassin, Saul, there are several types of people who falsely confess: compulsive type-attention seeker -- confesses to gain a piece of the fame, impress others, or to get attention compulsive type-homeless -- confesses as a way to get off the streets compulsive type-fugitive -- confesses to avoid being prosecuted for a crime elsewhere with stiffer penalties compulsive

Wrongful Convictions Based on Eyewitness Accounts Imagine if you will this hypothetical scenario -- you are walking to your car in a parking garage after a long day at work. You are tired and thinking of what is waiting for you on your desk tomorrow and what you will have to eat when you get home. Suddenly, a man jumps out from behind a parked car and points a gun at

(iv) misconduct by the police or unintentional mistake, together with the application of suggestive identification procedures, pressuring of a confession or inculpatory declaration by a suspect, not carrying out other channels of investigation following initial detection of a powerful suspect, and being unsuccessful to give the prosecutor enough proof which is able to point to an individual other than the defendant as the person behind the act. (v) Mistake