Verified Document

Improving Employee Engagement And Experience Creative Writing

IMPROVING EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AND EXPERIENCE

Abstract

This study sought to investigate the association between employee rewards and length of service for RQ1; and satisfaction with management policies/practices and quality of employee output for RQ2. It uses secondary data from the 2018 Federal Employees Viewpoint Survey and SPSS for analysis. The findings from the chi-square test of association show that a statistically significant association exists between rewards for innovation/creativity and length of service in the federal government. Employees who agree that creativity and innovation are effectively rewarded are likely to serve more years in the federal government. For the second research question, the Spearman Rho test study finds a moderately strong, positive correlation between employees satisfaction with management policies/practices and the overall quality of output from their work units. The findings of this study provide crucial insights for management and leadership teams within federal agencies on how to improve employee retention and increase the quality of output

Strategies for Enhancing Government Employees Engagement, Retention, and Performance

Research has shown that effective employee engagement and a positive work environment significantly contribute to improved customer outcomes and high performance (Deloitte Inc., 2021). A study by the Corporate Leadership Council (as cited in Deloitte Inc., 2021) found that less engaged employees were 22 percent less productive than their highly engaged peers, and that a unit increase in employee engagement in an organization increased the customer satisfaction index by 12 percent (Deloitte Inc., 2021).

Studies have also found a strong positive association between employee engagement and retention. According to Deloitte Inc. (2021), high levels of engagement increased an employees likelihood of staying with an organization by 40 percent. The Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) holds that retention management remains a crucial factor for organizations even in a tight job market (SHRM, 2008). First, employee turnover costs an organization money, time, and other resources. Available estimates indicate that on average, turnover-related costs impose a burden of between 50 and 60 percent of an employees annual salary in replacement expenses and accrued paid time off (SHRM, 2008). At the same time, turnover affects employee morale, reducing sales growth and a firms bottom line (SHRM, 2008). Thus, it remains crucial that organizations attract and retain top talent through high levels of employee engagement.

Unfortunately, compared to the private sector, the federal government underperforms in ensuring high levels of employee engagement or offering a positive employee experience. The 2020 report on the Best Places to Work in the Federal Government showed that the private sector significantly outperformed the federal government in training opportunities, recognition of high performance, and effective use of talents (Deloitte Inc., 2021). 78 percent of private sector employees felt that their talents were used well, as compared to 58 percent of employees in the federal government (Deloitte Inc., 2021). Further, only 51 percent of employees in the federal government felt satisfied with the training and development opportunities offered at the workplace, as compared to 64 percent of their counterparts in the private sector (Deloitte Inc., 2021). In the area of employee recognition, only 48 percent of federal government employees mentioned that their agencies recognized high performance, as compared to 67 percent in the private sector (Deloitte Inc., 2021).

With the Baby Boomers retiring from the workforce, it is prudent that the federal agencies take steps to attract and retain younger employees to remain effective in their missions. It is worth noting that the government continues to struggle in this respect for instance, in 2017, young people under 30 made up less than 6 percent of the total government workforce, as compared to 21 percent in the private sector (Deloitte Inc., 2017). Unfortunately, employees under 30 still account for the highest attrition rates in the federal government figures from 2021 indicate an attrition rate of 8.5 percent among this group, relative to the government-wide attrition rate of 6.1 percent reported that year (Partnership for Public Service, 2021). Fortunately, data also shows that compared to older age groups, employees under 30 pay more attention to policies that foster employee engagement at the workplace (Partnership for Public Service, 2021). For this reason, improved employee engagement provides an invaluable opportunity for the federal government to attract and retain younger employees.

This study seeks to identify ways by which the government could increase employee engagement. It focuses on two aspects of employee management: rewards for creativity and innovation, and policies and practices of senior leaders. The findings will go a long way towards informing government policies and human resource practices. The research questions are stated below:

RQ1: Is there a significant relationship between the rewarding of creativity and innovation by employees and the employees length of service in the federal government?

RQ2: Is there a significant relationship between the level of satisfaction with the policies and practices of senior leaders and the overall quality of work done by the employees work unit?

Literature Review

Theoretical Review

Herzbergs Two-Factor Theory of Motivation

Herzbergs two-factor motivation theory postulates that two sets of factors influence an employees level of job satisfaction. The first set are referred to as motivational factors or satisfiers (Alrawahi et al., 2020). These positively influence job satisfaction by addressing the need for self-actualization and self-growth. They include work advancement, responsibility, recognition, and achievements (Alrawahi et al., 2020). Advancement is the positive or upward change in ones status in the organization, such as opportunities for promotion and personal growth. Responsibility has to do with having the autonomy to make decisions in ones position (Alrawahi et al., 2020). An employee is likely to be satisfied if they have the power to make and execute decisions in their position. Recognition has to do with receiving rewards or praise for high performance (Alrawahi et al., 2020). Achievement is about realizing progress at work, finding adequate solutions to problems, and completing complex tasks (Alrawahi et al., 2020).

The second set of factors are referred to as hygiene factors, the lack of which lowers the level of job satisfaction (Alrawahi et al., 2020). Hygiene factors are extrinsic and include interpersonal relationships, quality of supervision, organizational policies, salaries, and working conditions (Alrawahi et al., 2020). Unfulfilled salary expectations, poor social interactions at the workplace, unclear and ineffective policies/guidelines, poor leadership, and poor physical working conditions could all cause job dissatisfaction (Alrawahi et al., 2020). According to the theory, the motivation and hygiene factors occur on a continuum, implying that one can be satisfied and dissatisfied concurrently. However, if the motivation factors outweigh the hygiene factors, employees feel satisfied with their jobs and are likely to stay longer (Alrawahi et al., 2020). Thus, employers must find a way to harmonize both sets of factors to bring about job satisfaction among employees (Alrawahi et al., 2020).

Empirical Review

i) The Relationship between Rewards, Job Satisfaction, and Retention

The relationship between rewards, job satisfaction, and retention has attracted immense interest from researchers. Mgedezi et al. (2014) sought to determine the effect of intrinsic motivation and job involvement on the loyalty of employees. Using a sample of 160 government employees drawn from different departments across the UK, the study administered a questionnaire measuring an individuals level of intrinsic motivation, their job involvement, and employee retention. The self-developed questionnaire was adopted from the Michigan Organizational-Assessment Questionnaire, which measures retention, and the Kanungos and Intrinsic Motivation Rating scales, which measure job involvement and intrinsic motivation respectively. The results of Pearson and multiple regression analyses showed a significant association between employee loyalty and both intrinsic motivation and job involvement. However, intrinsic motivation emerged as a stronger predictor of job retention than job involvement among government employees (Mgedezi et al., 2014).

The primary shortcoming of the Mgedezi et al. (2014) study is that it ignores the relationship between rewards and intrinsic motivation. Terera and Ngirande (2014) partly address this shortcoming in their study that involved 180 nurses drawn from different South African hospitals, and which measured the impact of rewards on job satisfaction and employee loyalty. A cross-tabulation of rewards and employee loyalty using the chi-square test of association found a positive association, implying that employees were more loyal if they were rewarded more. Chi-square tests also found a positive association between rewards and job satisfaction. Correlation tests found a strong, positive relationship between job satisfaction and employee retention. The study concluded that rewards positively influence job satisfaction, which, in turn, drives employee loyalty (Terera and Ngirande, 2014).

Other studies have adopted an expanded scope to assess the impact of different types of rewards on employee behaviour. A 2015 study by Lee et al., for instance, compared the effect of social and economic rewards on loyalty among 334 hotel staff recruited via an online survey. The study identified economic rewards as monetary rewards such as prizes and money advanced for good performance. Social rewards included personal recognition from management and access to certain special services (Lee et al., 2015). Correlation test results showed a strong association between loyalty and both types of rewards. However, social rewards yielded a stronger correlation coefficient than economic rewards. The study concluded that social rewards were more effective drivers of employee retention than economic rewards because they fostered intrinsic rather than extrinsic motivation (Lee et al., 2015).

These findings mirror those of another study Alhmoud and Rjoub (2019),...

…more than the expected count (17211). Further, those who have served the shortest tenures in federal service have the highest counts of employees who strongly disagree that creativity and innovation are rewarded. This leads to the conclusion that employees who have served in the federal service longer mostly agree/strongly agree that creativity is rewarded as compared to those who have served less years.

Given that the association is significant as shown in table 1, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a statistically significant relationship between the rewarding of creativity and innovation and the employees length of service in the federal government.

Research Question 2 (RQ2)

Table 3.

Correlations

Q28

Q66

Q28

Correlation coefficient

1

.399**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

N

594870

575349

Q66

Correlation coefficient

.399**

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

N

575349

576502

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

The correlation coefficient (r =.399, p = .00) is equal to 0.399 and is significant at the 95 percent confidence level (p=.05). This points to a moderately strong linear association between the dependent and independent variables. The positive coefficient indicates the direction of the relationship that the line of best fit has a positive slope, such that a unit increase in the level of employee satisfaction increases the quality of output in the work unit by 0.399 units or 39.9 percent. Based on the correlation results, the study rejects the null hypothesis and concludes that there is a statistically significant relationship between the level of satisfaction with the policies and practices of senior leaders and the overall quality of work one by the employees work unit.

Discussion

This empirical study sought to determine the strength of the association between employee rewards and length of service for RQ1; and satisfaction with management policies/practices and quality of employee output for RQ2. The findings from the analytical tests carried out show that a statistically significant association exists between rewards for innovation/creativity and length of service in the federal government. Employees who agree that creativity and innovation are effectively rewarded are more likely to serve more years in the federal government. This finding is consistent with the findings by Alhmoud and Rjoub (2019), Kyndt et al. (2008) and Malik et al. (2014), all of whom found that rewards significantly improved employee retention. Alhmoud and Rjoub (2019) explain that rewards increase job satisfaction for employees, which, in turn, increases their loyalty to the organization or agency. Thus, human resource divisions within federal agencies could improve retention rates among employees across the lifespan by strengthening their systems of rewarding employees who demonstrate high levels of creativity and innovation. Studies have shown that while all forms of rewards improved employee rewards, social rewards have a stronger effect on both job satisfaction and employee retention than monetary rewards ((Alhmoud & Rjoub, 2019).

For RQ2, this study finds a moderately strong, positive correlation between employees satisfaction with management policies/practices and the overall quality of output from their work units. This finding is consistent with Chang et al., (2013), Asrar-ul-Haq and Kuchinke (2016) and Ascensio (2016), all of whom found that leadership was a significant predictor of employee performance. Employees feel more satisfied if they feel that the leadership or management offers the support and guidance needed to succeed at work (Chang et al., 2013). This, in turn, enhances their productivity and performance. Thus, human resource divisions within federal agencies could improve the quality of output by instituting leadership policies that offer relevant support and guidance for employees to succeed in their work.

The greatest limitation of this study is that it focuses on federal employees and the results may, thus, not be generalizable to employees in the private sector. Future research could replicate the study using data collected from employees working in both the public and private sectors to observe how the findings would change.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study found that rewarding employees for creativity and innovation is a significant predictor of their length of service in the federal government. Further, satisfaction with the policies and practices of senior management significantly predicts the quality of output or performance among federal employees. The findings of this study provide crucial insights for management and leadership teams within federal agencies on how to improve employee retention and increase the quality of output. The study is timely because recent statistics show that compared to the private sector, the federal government underperforms in ensuring high levels of employee engagement or offering a positive employee experience. With the Baby Boomers retiring from the workforce, it is prudent that the federal agencies take steps to attract and retain younger employees to remain effective in their missions. Fortunately, data also shows that compared to older age groups, employees under 30 pay more attention to…

Sources used in this document:

References

Alagaraja, M., Cumberland, D. M., & Choi, N. (2015). The mediating role of leadership and people management practices on HRD and organizational performance. Human Resource Development International, 2(1), 1-15.

Alhmoud, A., & Rjoub, H. (2019). Total rewards and employee retention in a Middle Eastern context. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1-13.

Alrawahi, S., Sellgren, S., Altouby, S., Alwahaibi, N., & Brommels, M. (2020). The application of Herzberg's two-factor theory of motivation to job satisfaction in clinical laboratories in Omani hospitals. Heliyon, 6(9), 48-29. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04829Ascensio, H. (2016). Leadership, trust and job satisfaction in the public sector: A study of US federal employees. International Review of Public Administration, 21(3), 250-267.

Asrar-ul-Haq, M., & Kuchinke, P. (2016). Impact of leadership styles on employees’ attitudes towards their leader and performance: Empirical evidence from Pakistani banks. Future Business Journal, 2(1), 54-64.

Chang, C. C., Chiu, C. M., & Chen, C. A. (2013). The effect of TQM practices on employee satisfaction and loyalty in government. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 21(12), 1299-1314.

Deloitte Inc. (2021). The best places to work in the federal government. Deloitte Inc. https://bestplacestowork.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/11/2021/04/Getting_to_the_Heart_of_the_Matter__Engaging_Employees_to_Improve_the_Work_Experience-2018.03.13.pdf

Kyndt, L., Dochy, F., Michielsen, M., & Moeyaert, B. (2009). Employee retention: Organizational and personal perspectives. Vocations and Learning, 2(1), 195-215.

Lee, J., Tsang, N., & Pan, S. (2015). Examining the differential effects of social and economic rewards in a hotel loyalty program. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 49(1), 17-27.

Malik, M., Butt, A., & Choi, J. (2015). Rewards and employee creative performance: Moderating effects of creative self-efficacy, reward importance and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 59-74.

Mgedezi, S., Toga, R., & Mjoli, T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and job involvement on employee retention: Case study – a selection of Eastern Cape government departments. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 2119-2126.

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) (2018). 2018 Federal employee viewpoint survey. Author. https://www.opm.gov/fevs/reports/governmentwide-reports/governmentwide-reports/governmentwide-management-report/2018/2018-governmentwide-management-report.pdf

Partnership for Public Service (2021). Who is quitting and retiring? Important fiscal 2021 trends in the federal government. Partnership for Public Service. https://ourpublicservice.org/fed-figures/attrition/

Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2008). Retaining talent: A guide to analysing and managing employee turnover. SHRM Foundation.

Terera. S, & Ngirande, H. (2014). The impact of rewards on job satisfaction and employee retention. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 481-487.

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Employee Engagement
Words: 1609 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Employee engagement is the corporate world concept that involves employees enthusiastically in their work and their all actions are directed towards the organization goals and objectives. Employee engagement is also considered as their positive and negative emotional attachment with their work, peers and organization. This attachment influences their willingness to perform well in their duties and learn new skills to excel in their career in that organization. Employee engagement is

Employee Engagement Reflection on Applying Takeaways From
Words: 1276 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Employee Engagement Reflection on applying takeaways from class to my current management career Applying and understanding the concept of 'employee engagement' and the 'glass ceiling' to my management career For the past fifteen years I have been employed as a manager at a transportation company with an over 180-year history in the business. I have personally witnessed many shifts in the corporate culture during my tenure as I have moved up the ranks,

Employee Engagement This Research Report
Words: 2199 Length: 7 Document Type: Research Paper

Hence, most of the organizations now understand that engaged employees are highly influential source of competitive advantage. (Katherine, 2009) It was observed that an engaged employee is always ready to put extreme effort into their work in terms of time, intelligence and energy. They possess an aspiration to always perform their best. They perform any given task with liveliness and interest. They try to bring innovative ideas, bring a

Employee Engagement Organizations Do Not Exist in
Words: 2663 Length: 8 Document Type: Essay

Employee Engagement Organizations do not exist in a vacuum and require various resources in order to ensure continuity and resilience. The needed resources vary from financial, infrastructural, material, systematic and procedural resources as well as others depending on the vision, mission, goals and objectives of the organization. But having all these resources do not guarantee the success of the organization unless the most vital resource of all are optimized and these

Employee Engagement and Leadership
Words: 960 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Leadership Crucible Experience Leadership is a practice that is learnt from the experiences of the leaders. According to Bennis and Thomas (2002), a crucible is delineated as a changing experience through which a person ends up having a new sense of self and character. In particular, the capacity to mine knowledge from such challenging and difficult experiences is what differentiates and tells apart successful leaders from their counterparts (Bennis and Thomas,

Employee Engagement and Inclusion
Words: 607 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Managing Diversity Through Inclusion I have gained significant knowledge about managing diversity in an organization after reading Engelmeier's book. In essence, organizations with diverse leadership do record better performance, in light of both earnings margins and equity returns, unlike non-diverse peers. While this discovery is based on research on publicly traded entities, Shirley Engelmeier holds that the same principles apply to private entities. Engelmeier is the author of a book entitled,

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now