Economic Impact of Regulation of Gambling Term Paper

Excerpt from Term Paper :

Economic Impact of Gambling

Along with "Wine, Women and Song," gambling was often considered a vice. Indeed, gambling has been a part of human civilization and culture since times immemorial. Gambling has paralleled human evolution. One can easily find instances of gambling in the Bible and other historical references. Gambling can be defined as staking ones material possession for profit. In a broader definition, gambling can also be considered a pact where material profit is the ulterior motive. In modern times, perhaps incorrectly, gambling can be taken to mean any risk. As in "I 'gambled' on him (or her) doing this (or that)." For the purpose of this work, let's consider gambling in the narrow definition. Staking material possessions for profit. There are consequences to gambling. It can take forms of mild amusement. Or it can be a pathological condition. Indeed, gambling can result in injury to physical and emotional self, harm to those surrounding one who is afflicted, breaking up of relationships, and even suicide or homicides. (DeBerry and Bell, 1997) One might consider that pathological gamblers might have an affliction that causes them to be genetically predisposed to being addicted to one "vice" or another. Some of the above are sociological impacts of gambling. This work is concerned with the economic cause and effect conditions associated gambling regulation -- that is the involvement of government affairs into gambling. Sociological ramifications will only be considered in that they actually have direct or indirect consequences on the economy at the local, state and national level. More importantly, they affect people on a personal level. The gist of the essay is that like issues such as abortion, race, euthanasia or the conservative/liberal political and philosophical divide, different groups of people who agree or disagree with the need for gambling revenues can cite personal statements and comprehensively complied statistics that gambling has either been good for (or to) them. There are just as many people who will completely decry gambling.

In 1997, more than $50 billion were spent on legal commercial gambling. This business employed more than 600,000 people. From 1976, where only four states allowed gambling, today 47 states including the District of Columbia offer some form of gambling. The gambling industry is associated with large sums of money, which might be one of the top five revenue sources for certain states. There are different types of gambling: casino gambling, pari-mutuel gambling as in horse racing or off track betting (OTB). In addition, there are several local smaller outfits. The example of the last would be a video poker machine at the back of a convenience store or a bar. Internet gambling is a more recent phenomenon. The gambling industry, recognizing that the word "gambling" has negative connotations, calls itself the gaming industry. They aver that their profit margins are strictly based on people amusing and entertaining themselves. The American Gaming Association, in their website (www.americangaming.org) reports that there are more than 433 land-based, river-based and race track casinos scattered throughout eleven states. The gaming associations claim that they bring huge revenues to the state in the order of several billion dollars. In addition, gaming also provides the states strapped for cash with much needed revenues from state taxes -- from a nationwide low of 6.25 in Nevada to a high of 35 per cent in the state of Illinois. (AmericanGaming.org, 2002) These huge sums of money did not include the numerous smaller casinos whose gross annual revenues were one million dollars or less. The association averred that most of these revenues have beneficial impact. Funds were diverted towards public education and local development. As one might expect, the gaming association is a very powerful lobby that want to introduce legalized gambling into every state. They believe that gaming sites bring in out of town revenues. They increase local businesses. More importantly, they provide a lot of jobs for the local population. Table 1 shows compiled statistics for a few states that have legal gambling. The information provided deals with revenue distribution in the form of jobs and compensation and tax revenues. The purpose of Table 1 is to summarize the Gaming Associations arguments with economic facts. That Gross Revenues are generated from gaming in states. Local employees earn better than a minimum wage. Most of the tax revenues go to support local programs from education, environmental programs, local programs, and tourism to senior citizen services. These services, the gaming association avers, are nothing if not beneficial to the places that the gambling places are set up. As noted economist John Kenneth Galbraith stated: "People are the common denominator of progress." From this standpoint, gambling impacts people positively. Certain segments of the industry, resorts, hotels and casinos provide good pay and benefits. These can then be translated into health care, training and education. Some have argued that the entertainment and amusement that comes from visiting a casino after a hard day's work is beneficial to individuals mired in a stressful modern economy.

Similar statistics were shown by a 1996 Arthur Anderson study. They found that in 1995, the gaming industry grossed $22-25 billion dollars and contributed $2.9 billion in direct taxes. They employed almost 300,000 people ($400,000 additional indirect jobs) and paid $7.3 billion in wages, which easily exceeded the national average. (Rogers, 1998). A commission on behalf of the gaming industry also found that, near gambling establishments, unemployment rate, welfare outlays, and unemployment insurance also declined. In New Jersey, in 1993, 95% of the casino's employees were (besides being paid higher wages for the same skill-sets) were earning pension benefits. This was in comparison to 45% of the private sector workforce, nationally.

Besides Casinos, Pari-Mutuel gaming in 43 states is associated with horse race betting -- on and off the tracks. There are 150 racecourses in the U.S.A. They generate revenues of more than $15 billion, annually. They also employ more nearly 120,000 employees (of which, 36000 work at OTBs).

With horseracing comes a domain-industry associated with breeding and nurturing of horses. This also employs a great number of people. The total revenues from the direct and indirect association with horse racing yield a gross of more than $35 billion. (Unknown, The Economic Impact of the Horse Industry in the United States, 1996)

One of the burgeoning facets of the gaming industry are Native American Casinos (Gorman, 2003). Native Americans were given their own land. These were considered as sovereign nations that were not subject to the laws that governed the rest of the United States. As a result, casinos can operate under specific tax shelters. Thus, gamblers and gamers can access casinos and gaming halls for less money, thereby increasing the popularity of these casinos. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) reports that 156 tribes are involved in gambling activities. The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act was set up to ensure that the revenues generated from casinos on Native American lands should be used exclusively to promote tribal governmental programs, general welfare of tribal people and their economic development. The largest Indian casino is at Foxwoods in Connecticut. It belongs to the Mashantucket Pequots tribes. It grosses more than $1 billion dollars annually. It was opened in 1991. Besides tax-exempt status, the Indian Casinos have two major selling points. One is that they hire mostly local (non-native) citizens. Less than 10% of casino employees are Native Americans. Also they agree to contribute hefty sums of money to the states with their sovereign nations are affiliated. As proponents and opponents of legalized gambling will aver, this has both positive and negative effects. With Native American casinos operating at full capacity (with respect to viable tribes still in existence) within the Indian lands. A lot of disenfranchised natives are finding reasons to go back to the lands of their ancestors. Facilities like good education privileges and state of the art medical programs hitherto unknown are fast becoming available to the tribesmen. Gorman, in her report avers that this has increased the number of native employed and decreased the percentage (by 14%) those under the poverty line. With the positive, of course, there are several negatives: Crime in the form of auto-thefts, larceny and other forms of violence has increased. So has the number of bankruptcies. Like everything else, these gambling casinos in Indian territories are fast approaching a saturation point. A likely warning is not to "place one bets" that these would be long-term economic solutions. The revenue coming in of course offers a quick fix.

State lotteries are also big businesses. They generate large revenues. But they do not impact employment statistics as the private gaming sector does. One often hears advertisement where unclaimed lottery winnings are turned over to the state educational funds. One of the recent phenomena is Internet gambling. Here any person with a credit card can gamble from the confines of his or her own home. This gambling also works on a tax-free basis. Revenues are not redistributed to the local governments.

Most of the studies that…

Cite This Term Paper:

"Economic Impact Of Regulation Of Gambling" (2003, August 27) Retrieved June 20, 2017, from
http://www.paperdue.com/essay/economic-impact-of-regulation-gambling-151561

"Economic Impact Of Regulation Of Gambling" 27 August 2003. Web.20 June. 2017. <
http://www.paperdue.com/essay/economic-impact-of-regulation-gambling-151561>

"Economic Impact Of Regulation Of Gambling", 27 August 2003, Accessed.20 June. 2017,
http://www.paperdue.com/essay/economic-impact-of-regulation-gambling-151561