Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Without a doubt, one of the most controversial topics of popular discourse is stem cell research. Indeed, one would be hard pressed to peruse the newspaper or magazine stand without encountering some reference to the global stem cell debate -- but what, exactly, are stem cells, and why are they so controversial?
Stem cells intended for use in human applications are harvested from humans, umbilical cords and embryos. The reason these cells are so valuable is because of their capability to produce or "become" other cell types -- for example, brain cells, heart cells, skin, etc. In short, these are "master cells," holding the ability to divide in cultures, and to be manipulated allowing it to transform into any type of cell. Of course, this is extremely important due to the fact that scientists can use this capability to either create organs (thereby helping to meet the tremendous shortage of donor organs), or to create tissues to treat various diseases and disorders.
The reason the discourse surrounding the topic of stem cells these cells is so controversial is due to the fact that the most promising source of stem cells is human fetal tissue. Of course, in order to harvest the cells from such a source, the embryo, itself, must be destroyed. Because of this, many who hold anti-abortion views find this practice to be highly immoral and repugnant. However, the reason embryo stem cells are used at all is because of their ability to transform themselves into virtually any type of cell found in the body. The specific way this works is best described according to the process of normal embryonic development.
Of course, most people know the origin of human life begins with the sperm fertilizing the egg. After this, a single cell is created that holds all of the genetic information needed to form the entire human body. This cell divides and redivides over several days until these cells (known as totipotent, or as having "total potential") begin to specialize into the formation known as the "blastocyst," which has a hollow sphere of cells, and a cluster of inner cells (the inner cell mass). While the outer cells of this blastocyst proceed to form the placenta, the cells within the inner cell mass go on to form virtually all of the tissues and organs of the human body. It is these cells that are harvested to research stem cells.
It is also true that stem cells can be found in humans, children as well as adults. These stem cells can be found in the blood (the blood stem cell), where they are found in the bone marrow (hence, the "bone marrow transplant"). In this capacity, the function of blood stem cells is to continuously replenish the body's supply of red blood cells, platelets, and white blood cells. Without the blood stem cells in the marrow, the human body cannot survive.
Another main source of stem cells is found in the umbilical cord. So called "cord blood" is an incredibly rich source of the types of stem cells that make up the blood as well as the immune system. These cells can differentiate into blood cells (red, white, platelets), so successfully that some patients with Leukemia, Sickle Cell Anemia, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, have been completely cured. In addition, many scientists believe that the stem cells harvested from the umbilical cord could have a tremendous impact on the research and treatment of diseases and disorders such as Alzheimer's, cancer, and many brain disorders (particularly pediatric).
The problem with umbilical cord stem cells, however, is the small amount that can be harvested from any particular cord. Because this is the case, the use of these cells for transplants is normally reserved for pediatric patients or very small adults. However, there are emerging new methods by which these stem cells can be expanded. For example, the American Society of Hematology has discovered a way to expand cord blood cells, and has proven that these cells are every bit as successful as non-expanded cord blood cells. Not only is this development good for those in desperate need of transplantation, but because cord blood is harvested without damaging the fetus, the controversy surrounding its use is minimal. (Laino, 1)
It is true that adult stem cells can be used for research. These cells are found throughout the human body, and they, too, have the capacity to develop into different types of cells -- however, they pale in comparison to the ability of embryonic cells to differentiate into specialized cells. As many researches believe, adult stem cells are more "rigid" in their ability to grow and replicate. However, there is promising research that these cells can be successfully harvested and used.
As previously stated, the controversy surrounding stem cell research is primarily due to the use of embryos. Not only could using cord blood and adult stem cells end the moral outcry, but in expanding the amount of cells, many with immune and blood disorders could be helped. However, there is another side to the coin -- for just as there are millions against the use of embryonic stem cells for research and development, so, too are there millions in favor of their use due to their tremendous potential.
It is true that embryonic stem cells are superior to cord blood and adult stem cells. After all, although cord blood has the capability to generate healthy blood and immune cells, it does not hold the boundless possibility of embryonic cells to produce virtually every organ and tissue within the body, including blood. Indeed, it is as if the embryonic stem cell holds the magic key to the whole of the body.
For this reason, there are many who strongly advocate using aborted fetuses (which, they argue, are usually thrown in the garbage, anyway), or unused embryos in fertility clinics. Many even go so far as to assert that embryos could be created expressly for medical purpose.
However, those who do believe in the importance of using embryonic stem cells (and creating embryos for this purpose), face tough opposition. In fact, on August 9, 2001, President George Bush announced that experiments should be conducted from existing cell stocks, and that the government would not financially support laboratories that use embryos specifically created for research. Interestingly, this pleases neither side of the debate. Of course it is obvious that those in favor of the creation of embryos for stem cell harvest would oppose the President and his view. However, the anti-embryo harvest camp would like the practice to be halted on all embryos -- even the ones that exist now.
As controversial as this all is, ongoing research with laboratory animals demonstrates the immense good that therapy using stem cells can accomplish. For example, experiments involving mice have shown that it is possible to insert specific genes into stem cells that can work to "activate" the immune system. The ramifications of this ability are staggering -- for, if this is the case, in theory, such cells can be utilized to fight cancer, help facilitate transplant acceptance, as well as in curing immune disorders, including AIDS.
In addition, further uses of stem cells indicated by animal experimentation include the treatment of Parkinson's disease, damaged heart tissue, as well as spinal cord injuries -- even to the degree of paralysis.
Morally, however, the use of stem cells is uncharted territory. After all, many people believe that using all human embryos -- aborted fetuses or left over embryos, constitutes the destruction of human life, and is therefore, wrong. These people not only advocate the use of adult and cord blood stem cells, but actively lobby against the use of embryonic sources.
It is important to note that this stem cell controversy is not limited to the United States, alone, but is of high importance throughout the world. Indeed, some countries show no hesitation in stem cell research. For example, in England, scientists not only may conduct research on existing donated embryos, but they are allowed to create new ones for research by cloning them. However, many other countries, including Austria, France, Ireland, and Germany prohibit all embryo research, while others still allow research (like the United States), but with strict limitations (Finland, Spain, Japan, and Denmark).
Arguably, one of the most interesting aspects of the stem cell debate is the amount of political and governmental influence applied to the issue. Indeed, it is fascinating that what is, essentially, a medical and scientific practice, and is as such, governed by medical and scientific standards of ethics, is considered fair game for politicians and governments, worldwide. Although many consider that political and governmental intervention in the stem cell debate is appropriate, many believe that politicians and governments are "meddling" in areas where they neither have expertise, nor jurisdiction.
An excellent example of this attitude is included in Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis' opinion that each state should regulate stem cell research, and not the federal government. He writes," Where…[continue]
"Stem Cells Without A Doubt One Of" (2004, March 15) Retrieved December 9, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/stem-cells-without-a-doubt-one-of-164179
"Stem Cells Without A Doubt One Of" 15 March 2004. Web.9 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/stem-cells-without-a-doubt-one-of-164179>
"Stem Cells Without A Doubt One Of", 15 March 2004, Accessed.9 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/stem-cells-without-a-doubt-one-of-164179
In the words of Obama, "Today, with the executive order I am about to sign, we will bring the change that so many scientists and researchers, doctors and innovators, patients and loved ones have hoped for, and fought for, these past eight years: We will lift the ban on federal funding for promising embryonic stem cell research," President Obama further said. "We will vigorously support scientists who pursue this
Unfortunately, these undifferentiated cells cannot be harvested or removed from an adult because an adult's cells have already matured. Once matured, cells can't be overwritten to become another type of cell. but, embryonic cells are technically at a stage of growth where they are clearly cells but they have not yet reached a stage of becoming a specialized cell. Therefore, the stem cells can still be rewritten or redirected so
In this sense technology turns human life into just another product that can be created in a laboratory and which has no intrinsic or deeper religious value or meaning. As John Paul II stated during a visit to America, "A free and virtuous society, which America aspires to be, must reject practices that devalue and violate human life at any stage from conception until natural death" (Dart, 2001, p.
Stem Cell The recent discovery of stem cell usefulness in helping cure persistent disease and medical problems presents an interesting dilemma for society and those interested in exploring this technology. Before rushing into using this tool, it is my opinion that the defining terms of this topic should be fully understood. The difference between adult stem cell and embryonic stem cell applications are differing along with the moral and ethical implications
And perhaps most importantly of all, the UW researchers continue, stem cells "...provide our only window to the earliest stages of human development and, after differentiation, access to more specialized cells that could vastly improve our understanding of the onset of cell-based diseases, and perhaps ways to prevent them." Among the diseases that may be able to be treated - and even cured - through stem cell research are Parkinson's Disease,
Ethics of Stem Cell Research Stem Cell Research Ethics The Ethics of Stem Cell Research: A Nursing Perspective The Ethics of Stem Cell Research: A Nursing Perspective When the world-famous cloned sheep, Dolly, was euthanized at the relatively young age of 6-1/2 years she was suffering from advanced aging and lung disease (Meek, 2003). In human years, Dolly was only about 40-years old and had been suffering from arthritis for many years. This outcome
While freedom of religion absolutely guarantees the right to refrain from choosing to submit to stem cell-based treatment, the same freedoms and the concept of separation of church and state absolutely preclude religious beliefs about when life "begins" (or about anything else) from dictating laws that affect other people who may not share those particular beliefs (Dershowitz, 2002). Beneficence and Non-malfeasance Certainly, both the concept of beneficence and non-malfeasance absolutely prohibit