Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
As it pertains to sweatshops, indications that the company was operating sweatshops came first in 1998. During this time sweatshops were found in Asia and the company was only paying workers 80 cents per day.
Nike's behavior in both these instances created a backlash that is still present. Prior to the findings of human rights violations, Nike had a good reputation as an employer. However, after the presence of human rights violations were found consumers and human rights advocates alike begin to question Nike's business practices and the company's commitment to human rights. At the time Nike promised to "increase the minimum age for workers at Nike's contract plants in Asia to 18, improve factory air quality, allow independent monitoring and provide free education for workers. But critics said the reforms did nothing to address the main problem -- that workers at those plants aren't paid a living wage. They say
U.S. companies in Asia pay workers in China and Vietnam $1.60 a day and workers in Indonesia less than $1 when these employees say they need $3 a day to maintain an adequate living standard.
Nike officials have said the company pays the minimum wage or the industry standard in whatever country they operate
in. "These factories are sweatshops," said Medea Benjamin, spokeswoman for the San Francisco-based human rights group Global Exchange. "They're clean, well-lighted sweatshops, but they're still sweatshops."
Nike's treatment of workers in Asia was only one incident of many involving Nike and human rights violations. According to Spar & Burns (2002) throughout the 1980's and 1990's Nike was constantly under scrutiny as it pertained to the company's human rights violations.
The author explains that these violations included underage workers in Indonesia, forced overtime in China and perilous working conditions in Vietnam. All of these human rights issues came to a head in the late 1990s when many interest groups and citizens of the world began to boycott Nike products.
Spar & Burns (2002) explains that Nike's human rights violations were derived in some part by the overall business strategy of the company. This business strategy was developed in the late 1960s and included the practice of reducing costs by outsourcing all jobs involving manufacturers.
Today this is a very common practice and in some ways there is much more regulation of such outsourcing so that workers are better protected. However at the time this was unchartered territory especially as it pertained to a company the size of Nike. The lack of oversight and the lack of attention being paid to human rights at the time is what allowed Nike to operate in the manner in which it did.
The company's cost saving strategy functioned by not paying workers a living wage. Although the company was paying what the workers in that area of the world were receiving for a day's work, this wage was not a living wage. This is another problem that multinational company's often have. When conducting business in a country outside of the United States that average cost of hiring a worker is much cheaper Even though many multinational companies can afford to pay employees more, they don't because they don't have to. Ultimately the ability of companies such as Nike to pay much less in labor costs can result in increased profitability. In addition, the government of many of the host countries do not have the capacity to oversee the treatment of workers, in addition, in some instances governments don't complain even if they know that human rights violations are occurring because these company's are providing some revenue for the host country and jobs for the people of the country. In the case of Nike all of these issues came into play as it pertained to the human rights violations of the company.
In addition to Nike other multinational companies have also been found committing human rights violations. One such company is Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart is the largest retailer in the world. The company has stores throughout the United States and all over the world. The main focus of Wal-Mart's human rights violations has been focused on the company's labor practices and child labor violations.
Unlike Nike, Wal-Mart's human rights violations occurred not only overseas but also in America. This is unusual because human right violations usually occur in poorer countries that have very little oversight. However Wal-Mart's relationship to the American workforce is unusual because of the size of the company and the position that it holds amongst American retailers.
Wal-Mart's labor practices have been the source of a great deal of scrutiny over the years. One of the labor complaints about the company came in the form of violations of child labor laws
. Apparently, some minors working for Wal-Mart in Arkansas, New Hampshire and Connecticut were allowed to operate some hazardous equipment.
The company was forced to pay a $135,540 fine for violating child labor laws.
As a result of this violation and other violations at the company, Wal-Mart was forced to develop a labor deal with the United States government.
However, this deal was scrutinized because it placed a great deal of restrictions on the amount of oversight that the government would have as it pertained to monitoring the company for further labor violations. In fact the deal established and 15 day notification before any monitoring could take place. According to many critics the deal that was reached was nothing more than a sweetheart deal and that it would do little or nothing to deter the company from violating labor laws. The article explains,
"The Bush Labor Department chose to do an unprecedented favor for Wal-Mart,
despite the fact it is well-known for violating labor laws, including child labor laws," Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), the lawmaker who requested an investigation, said in a statement. He also said such an arrangement could allow the nation's largest employer to cover up evidence of a violation and would discourage employees who might fear retribution from filing a complaint ."
Recent cases involving Human rights violations and the Alien Torts Act
The violation of human rights by multinational corporations have not occurred without . This is particularly true of cases involving the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA). In short the ATCA, originally adopted in 1789, asserts that "asserted that "the district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States."
The law of nations is basically a treatise between nations in the international community which establishes that the laws of nature will be acknowledge and adhered to.
The purpose of the law of nations is to establish and guarantee the safety of the world's citizens. ATCA is a law that has been relatively unused but over the last few decades an increased awareness and enforcement of human rights has led many plaintiffs to address various grievances.
Specific cases in which ATCA was utilized include the consolidated cases of Ntsebeza v. Daimler a.G. And Khulumani v. Barclay's National Bank Inc.
. In the case of Ntsebeza v. Daimler a.G. The plaintiffs charged that the defendants engaged in discriminatory actions that were consistent with the constructs of apartheid which was prevalent in South Africa during the time the plaintiffs were employed by Daimler, the defendant. This period of time extended from 1973 until 1994. The acts for which the plaintiffs were suing included geographic segregation, employment discrimination based on political beliefs, arbitrary denationalization, forced exile, extrajudicial killing of family members and torture.
As a result of this discrimination, a class action suit was brought on behalf of the workers and all black South Africans.
The suit claimed that the defendants had directly and indirectly violated the law of nations.
The other lawsuit involved Khulumani v. Barclay's National Bank Inc.. This case also involved South African plaintiffs and designated four different classes of plaintiffs.
These classes included
1. The torture class-composed of those who were tortured and raped by South African security officials from 1960-1994.
2. The extrajudicial killing class-composed of survivors of persons killed by the South African security officials from 1960-1994.
3. The cruel treatment class- composed of all those who were subjected to cruel and inhuman treatment by the South African security officials from 1960-1994.
4. The detention class-composed of all those detained unlawfully and for periods of time by the South African security officials from 1960-1994.
Initially in 2004 the cases were dismissed on the grounds that the ATCA did not cover aiding and abetting liability, which would be associated with the companies involved in both of the aforementioned cases. However in 2007 the plaintiffs appealed to the second circuit and the decision of the previous court was affirmed in part and also reversed in part. The second Circuit upheld the dismissal of the plaintiffs case under TVPA. However, the second circuit reverse the decision of the court in regards to the ACA. The second court ruled instead that…[continue]
"Human Rights Violations Are A" (2009, May 13) Retrieved October 25, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/human-rights-violations-are-a-21915
"Human Rights Violations Are A" 13 May 2009. Web.25 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/human-rights-violations-are-a-21915>
"Human Rights Violations Are A", 13 May 2009, Accessed.25 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/human-rights-violations-are-a-21915
Shell Oil in Nigeria Discussions on economic hardship, environmental devastation, and political corruption in Nigeria always seem to come back to the Dutch Shell Oil Company. The company is charged by activists and Wiwa as influencing the Nigerian government to act illegally and, if we believe the allegations, monstrously in violation of human rights in order to exploit the oil resources in the Niger River Delta area (Livesey 58; Saro-Wiwa 7).
Human Rights Abuse Human rights violations among women in Afghanistan There are several human rights abuses that are perpetuated in Afghanistan that makes the country rank very poorly among the nations of the world when it comes to human rights issues. Of greater concern in the context of this essay are the abuses that are directed towards women within the country. The abuses are numerous and are encountered on a daily basis
They worked in agriculture, fishing and fish processing and small-scale manufacturing firms in Thailand. Thailand is also a major destination for cross-border trafficked women and children in the Mekong region. Records showed that more than 1 million migrant workers registered in the government (Human Trafficking). The study also said that these said sectors rely on and need cheap labor in order to achieve or maintain a competitive edge in their
human rights violation you selected and explain why you see it as a human rights violation. Then consider how the issue could be addressed or resolved and explain if you believe you have a duty or an obligation to act based on this violation. Why or why not? Human rights violations in the workplace According to Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "Everyone has the right to freedom
Human Rights The concept of Human Rights has a long history of over two thousand years and its origin can be traced to the moral philosophies of Aristotle and the Stoic philosophers. The theory of human rights, however, has broadened in concept over the centuries and its contemporary form reflects the development in human thought over time. In the present day world, Human Rights aim to secure for individuals the necessary
Human Rights and Child Prostitution in Haiti The Republic of Haiti is a Caribbean country occupying smaller portion of Hispaniola Island. It shares the island with Dominican which is equally another Caribbean country with population of just over 600, 000. In 2011, the population of the Republic of Haiti hit 9 million-mark with chances of a tremendous growth projected in the subsequent years. With the capital located at Port-au-Prince, the country's
When the human rights related to HIV / AIDS are not respected, the vulnerability of the infection and spread of HIV increases and effective response to the epidemic is impeded. It is important to integrate a human rights approach when dealing with HIV / AIDS because once there rights are protected and promoted, vulnerability reduces, response to the epidemic is enhanced, and discrimination against infected individuals is discouraged. References Boesten, J.