American support for capital punishment: demographics and arguments

Capital Punishment

Like abortion, the institution of capital punishment is a very divisive topic. The line dividing the supporters and opponents of capital punishment is variably drawn across political philosophies, race, sex and religion. The Governor of Illinois, not long ago, declared a moratorium on death penalty cases in his state. This essay is dedicated to a presentation of facts about capital punishment, without delving into personal opinions in support or opposition. Approximately, 80 per cent of Americans support the death penalty. When options are offered, such as life imprisonment without possibility of parole, the number of people who support the death penalty reduces to about 53 per cent. Recently, the number of people put to death has decreased. Improvements in forensic technologies, especially, DNA testing is the cause. Many unfairly condemned people have been exonerated.

Strong cases have been made for and against capital punishment. Supporters of the death penalty believe that justice is served. This justice is the basis of a moral community. They believe that vicious criminals have forfeited their rights to free society and even life itself. The arguments range from deterrence to retribution and punishment. It is also about protecting the innocent. The arguments against, however, are based on its actual administration in our society. Opponents believe that since death is irreversible, there is the risk of killing an innocent person. They also believe that the death penalty is disproportionately meted out to those who cannot afford good and aggressive legal representation -- thus the poor and minorities are at risk. Death penalty opponents also believe that the deterrence weakness argument is weak. They believe that to kill a human being identifies society as at the same level as criminals. (Dorsen, 2002)

History of Capital Punishment

Since ancient times, capital punishment was applied regularly. Historically, it was since 1750 BCE, Code of Hammurabi established edicts and precedents for the death penalty. From the fall of Rome to modern times, capital punishment was practiced throughout Western Europe. The modern movement for the abolition of capital punishment began in the 18th century. The socialists and anti-royalists Montesquieu and Voltaire were the first known death penalty abolitionists. Around that time, Great Britain was also seeing a shift in death penalty perceptions due to the efforts of Jeremy Bentham. South and Central American nations, Venezuela and Costa Rica abolished the death penalty in 1863 and 1877, respectively.

As of mid-2001, capital punishment has been abolished in seventy-five nations. Some countries have retained the death penalty only for crimes of war, treason. In some cases, drug trafficking meets with this harshest sentence. In other countries, capital punishment is a law but has not been imposed in several years. Countries that have retained the death penalty for a broad range of crimes, especially murder. These countries are mostly in Asia, Africa and the Caribbean. The U.S.A. And China are nations that impose the death penalty the most frequently. Until the 1890s, hanging was the primary method of execution used in the United States.

Hanging is still used in Delaware and Washington, although both have lethal injection as an alternative method of execution. The last hanging to take place was January 25, 1996. In 1924, the use of cyanide gas was introduced in Nevada. In 1977, Oklahoma became the first state to adopt lethal injection as a means of execution, though it would be five more years before the first person executed by lethal injection in Texas.

Today, 37 of the 38 states that have the death penalty use lethal injection. In the United States, since the 1970s, almost all capital sentences in the United States have been imposed for homicide. The constitutionality of the death penalty has been highly debated. The Eighth Amendment that precludes "cruel and unusual punishment," has been raised. The 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case of Furman v. Georgia ruled that capital punishment as then practiced was unconstitutional. (USSC, 1976) In 1977, Gary Gilmore, was executed by a firing squad in Utah. Today, 38 states and the federal government have reinstituted the death penalty. In 1982, Texas became the first state to execute a prisoner using lethal injection, which is now the method of choice. Texas currently leads all other states in the number of executions carried out. In 2002, the Court barred the execution of mentally retarded offenders. In 2002, the Court ruled that the death penalty must be imposed through a finding of a jury and not a judge.

DNA testing has helped exonerate about twenty-six per cent of the condemned inmates on death rows. DNA testing to identify crimes and criminals (or not) has helped catch mistakes. It has proved that the courts and jury can make mistakes. Supporters of the death penalty are requesting prosecutors to encourage the use of DNA testing to prove without reasonable doubts that the crime was indeed committed by the individual on trial. Though very reliable, DNA test are error-prone during processing. DNA testing can only be used in cases where the crime was intimate and personal. (Easterbrook, 2000)

Statistics and Modes of Capital Punishment in the United States

Before hanging, the inmate is weighed. The process is rehearsed using a sandbag of the inmate's weight. This is to determine the length of drop necessary to ensure a quick death. If the rope is too long, the inmate could be decapitated, and if it is too short, the strangulation could take as long as 45 minutes. Before the execution, the prisoner's hands and legs are secured; he or she is blindfolded; the noose is placed around the neck, with the knot behind the left ear. The execution takes place when a trapdoor is opened and the prisoner falls through. The prisoner's weight causes a rapid fracture-dislocation of the neck.

Firing squad still remains a method of execution in Utah and Idaho. Lethal injection is also used. Inmates are allowed to choose the method in which they want to die. For execution by firing squad, the inmate is bound to a chair with leather straps across his waist and head. The inmate is seated in front of an oval shaped canvas wall. Sandbags to absorb the inmate's blood surround the chair. A black hood is pulled over the inmate's head. A doctor locates the inmate's heart with a stethoscope and pins a circular white cloth target over it. Five shooters, standing twenty feet away and armed with.30 caliber rifles loaded with single rounds. One of the shooters is given blank rounds. Each of the shooters aims his rifle through a slot in the canvas and fires at the inmate. The prisoner dies as a result of blood loss caused by rupture of the heart or tearing of the lungs.

New York introduced electrocution while seeking a humane alternative to hanging. The first electric chair was built in 1888. Today, electrocution is used as the sole method of execution only in Nebraska. The condemned is shaved and strapped to a chair with belts across the chest, groin, legs, and arms. A metal skullcap-shaped electrode is attached to the scalp and forehead over a sponge moistened with saline. An additional electrode is moistened with conductive jelly and attached to a portion of the prisoner's leg that has been shaved to reduce resistance to electricity. A jolt of between 500 and 2000 volts, which lasts for about 30 seconds, is given. The doctors wait for the body to cool down and then check to see if the inmate's heart is still beating. Jolts are applied until the prisoner is dead.

States that have lethal gas also have lethal injection as an alternative method of execution. The condemned person is strapped to a chair in an airtight chamber. Below the chair rests a container of sulfuric acid. A long stethoscope is typically affixed to the inmate so that a doctor outside the chamber can pronounce death. The room is sealed. The warden then gives a signal to the executioner who flicks a lever that releases crystals of sodium cyanide into the pail. This causes a chemical reaction that releases hydrogen cyanide gas. The prisoner is instructed to breathe deeply to speed up the process.

When lethal injection is used, the condemned person is usually bound to a gurney and a member of the execution team positions several heart monitors on his skin. Two needles are then inserted into usable veins, usually in the inmate's arms. Long tubes connect the needle through a hole in a cement block wall to several intravenous drips. A saline solution is administered. Next, the inmate is injected with sodium thiopental. This is an anesthetic. Then pavulon or pancuronium bromide, which paralyzes the entire muscle system and stops the inmate's breathing. The flow of potassium chloride stops the heart. Death results from anesthetic overdose and respiratory and cardiac arrest. (Weiseberg, 1991)

The states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Nebraska, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. Idaho and Utah allow executions by firing squad. Arizona, California, Maryland, Mississippi and North Carolina alternatively allow death by lethal injection and the gas chamber. Montana and Washington still have hanging. Besides the states Alaska, Washington DC, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin, which do not have the death penalty, the other states only have the lethal injection.

Since 1977, when the death penalty was restored, the number of executions in the United States has been 618. Texas leads the nation with 209 executions. Colorado, Idaho and Ohio have the lowest with one each. The other states' executions are: Virginia-75, Florida-46, Missouri- 41,

Louisiana-25, South Carolina-24, Georgia-23, Oklahoma-22, Alabama-21, Arkansas-21, Arizona-20, North Carolina-15, Illinois-12, Delaware-10, Nevada-8, California-7, Indiana-7,

Utah-6, Mississippi-4, Maryland-3, Nebraska-3, Pennsylvania-3, Washington-3, Kentucky-2, Montana-2 and Oregon-2.

Since 1976, the number of executions has steadily increased with the largest number of increases in 2001. Since 2002 and 2003, DNA testing has decreased the number of executions. Race is a consideration that is often brought up in the case of death penalties. Of the more than 3000 inmates on death row or those executed, 48.02% are white; approximately 40% are black, less than eight percent are Latino. Less than one per cent are Native Americans and about 1.3% are Asian. The inmates on death row (or executed) are overwhelmingly male with 89%. An interesting statistic is how the distribution of death row inmates occurs with the race of the victims. White defendants were guilty crimes against victims that were white overwhelmingly. By contrast, black defendants committed crimes against more whites than blacks. In general, victims were white, more than eighty-two percent; blacks victims were about twelve percent, Latinos were a little more than 3% and Asian victims were in the minority. (USDOJ.gov, 2003)

Arguments for Capital Punishment

It has been mentioned before that most Americans support the death penalty. Even opponents argue that if the death penalty had been abolished, the mastermind of the Oklahoma City bombings would have still been alive. For several, the argument boils down to simply: "You kill, you die." For others, the argument is about deterrence. To illustrate this point the example of Saudi Arabia has often brought to the fore. Saudi Arabia beheads its criminals. Very often, there is no trial -- certainly not by jury. The victims are often asked to mete out the punishment. Saudi Arabia averages approximately one murder or less per year. Deterrence has a lot to do with the idea that the morality and legality of society has to be maintained.

Conservative columnist Jonah Goldberg writing in the National Review Online magazine, also disagrees with the deterrence premise. He avers that it should be about punishment. Punishment should fit the crime. Let alone the good of society. It is about punishment for doing wrong. The conservative's viewpoint is that there are consequences to every action and the criminal has to be responsible for his or her actions. (MSU.edu, 2003)

Justice Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Supreme Court is a strong supporter of capital punishment. In a dissent to Justice Anthony Blackmum's opinion on Callins vs. Collins, he avers: "for example, the case of the 11-year-old girl raped by four men and then killed by stuffing her panties down her throat. How enviable a quiet death by lethal injection compared with that." (Scalia, 1994)

Arguments Against Capital Punishment

There is a plethora of arguments against the death penalty. A comprehensive statistical survey (ref) showed that the idea of deterrence is at best weak. This is because most of those that commit violent crimes do so without the expectation of being caught. The same works with drug crimes. The criminals think that they cannot be caught. There is no evidence to show that the deterrence works. This is from a counting of violent crimes in states where the death penalty is in effect. Death penalty opponents believe that it is cruel and unusual and has defined the evolution of civilization: while murder is abhorrent, and any policy of state-authorized killings is immoral. They believe that capital punishment denies due process of law. It is irreversible and a human life is at stake. They cite statistics the imposition of death penalty because of mistakes. The also aver that the death penalty violates the constitutional guarantee of the equal protection of the laws. It is applied randomly at best and discriminatorily at worst.

Executions give society the unmistakable message that human life no longer deserves respect Reliance on the death penalty obscures the true causes of crime and distracts attention from the social measures that effectively contribute to its control. There are many studies for different states that show that the process of appeals and the cost of an execution far outweigh an inmate's natural life in case of life imprisonment. Though this is not borne out by statistics, the poor and those that cannot afford adequate representation might be given the death penalty while they might be innocent. (MSU.edu, 2003)

Conclusions

Most civilized nations do not have the death penalty. However, one must spare a thought for the lives of those left behind by the victims. An ABC News broadcast did an hour's documentary on the final days of an inmate until the time of execution. The viewer could not help but feel sympathetic to the inmate. This is because the inmate had the opportunity to repent. He had turned to religion. He was portrayed in the documentary of being "disinfected" from his crimes. Indeed, the viewer hoped that the appeals would be successful, or at least, the governor would grant him a reprieve. But this was not to be. On the other hand, what needed to be considered was that this inmate was condemned to die because he was said to have killed two men during a robbery. He had executed these so called witnesses while they pleaded for their life. (Bedau, 2004)

One might consider that even if the death penalty is allowed to remain in the United States, great pain should be taken, erring on the side of preserving of life to ensure that there is enough evidence that point towards the alleged criminals. The latest available technology should always be used. Prosecutors should not merely pad their resumes. They have the responsibility of upholding the law. Politicians should not pander to the electorate. Governors should review each case thoroughly. If the death penalty is the extreme and ultimate form of justice, care should be taken that justice should be served.